Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “518 U.S. 515 (1996)”
Zukerman v. U.S. Postal Serv.public domain
*63Based on USPS's stated purpose in establishing the pilot program, its reliance on nonpublic-forum case law in the final rule, its use of the customized postage program as a commercial enterprise, and its strengthening of the restrictions over time, the Court concludes that, regardless of how one might characterize the prior Guidelines, the customized postage program un
Bradford v. U.S. Department of Laborpublic domain
Appellate Case: 22-1023 Document: 010111040629 Date Filed: 04/30/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 30, 2024
Kilmer v. U.S. Customs and Border Protectionpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL F. KILMER, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 17-1566 (CKK) U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Defendant MEMORANDUM OPINION (November 15, 2023) This lawsuit arises from a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request made by pro se Pl
Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justicepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JENNER & BLOCK LLP, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25-916 (JDB) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In our constitutional order, few stars are as fixed as the principle that no official “can prescribe what shall be orthodox in polit
Perkins Coie LLP v. U.S. Department of Justicepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERKINS COIE LLP, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-716 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
Colindres v. U.S. Department of Statepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KRISTEN H. COLINDRES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 21-cv-348 (GMH) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs are a long-married couple with a young daughter who lived together in th
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 22-1427 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 25, 27 : U.S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NEIL ANAND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-1635 (CKK) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (March 27, 2023) This lawsuit arises from Freedom of Information
Kilmer v. U.S. Customs and Border Protectionpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL F. KILMER, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 17-1566 (CKK) U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Defendant MEMORANDUM OPINION (May 14, 2021) This lawsuit arises from a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”)
Am. Oversight v. U.S. Gen. Servs. Admin.public domain
BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge The plaintiff, American Oversight ("AO"), a "nonpartisan organization committed *333to the promotion of transparency in government," Compl. ¶ 5, ECF No. 1, challenges the response of the General Services Administration ("GSA"), to a request for, inter alia , records reflecting communications between GSA and
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NEIL ANAND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-1635 (CKK) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (March 27, 2023) This lawsuit arises from Freedom of Inform
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcementpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 23 - 3343 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan U.S. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, et al., Defendants.
State v. U.S. Dep't of Educ.public domain
EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Petitioner State of Ohio, Opportunities for Ohioans with Disabilities, Bureau of Services for the Visually Impaired, Business Enterprise Program's ("BSVI") Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (ECF No. 23 ); Intervenor-Respondent James Cyrus's ("Mr. Cyrus") Motion to Enforce Arbitration and Memorandum in Opposition to Petitioner'
Turner v. U.S. Agency for Global Mediapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GRANT TURNER, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-2885 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. AGENCY FOR GLOBAL MEDIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORAN
Pinson v. U.S. Department of Justicepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEREMY PINSON ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No.: 12-1872 (RC) v. ) ) Re Docum
Castro v. U.S. Department of Homeland Securitypublic domain
MEMORANDUM Diamond, District Judge Petitioners — twenty-nine Central American women and their thirty-five minor children — were seized by the Department of Homeland Security within minutes of their illegal entry into the United States. Acting pursuant to the Immigration and Naturalization Act, DHS ordered their “expedited removal” after finding that none had a “credible fear” of torture or persecution upon
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN OVERSIGHT, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-1267 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM
Shapiro v. U.S. Department of Justicepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER United States District Judge Ryan Noah Shapiro brings suit against the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, seeking the release of any records held by the FBI that relate to “Occupy Houston,” an offshoot of
Kuang v. U.S. Dep't of Def.public domain
The party seeking class certification bears the burden of demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that all four requirements of Rule 23(a) and at least one of the three requirements under Rule 23(b) are met. See Dukes , 564 U.S. at 350-51,
SS Grocery, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.public domain
LaSHANN DeARCY HALL, United States District Judge Plaintiffs SS Grocery, Inc. and Abu Numan bring this action against Defendant U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service ("FNS") seeking judicial review-under 7 U.S.C. § 2023(a)(13) and § 7 CFR 279.7-of FNS' decision to disqualify Plaintiffs from part