Cases

RICHARD LEON, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 40], filed on behalf of Defendants Michael Hughes and Jeremy Alford. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS the motion. BACKGROUND I. Procedural History Plaintiff Pamela Lyles ("plaintif

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 20, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert

Case: 18-50977 Document: 00515566402 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/16/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 16, 2020

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Plaintiffs, and WATER WORKS AND SANITARY SEWER BOARD OF THE CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. Civil Action No. 15-696 (EGS) UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, et al., Defendants, and STATE OF GEORGIA, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. ALABAMA POWER CO

MEMORANDUM OPINION RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge Plaintiff Daniel Lugo, proceeding pro se, was serving a prison sentence in New York when he was convicted of the federal crime of conspiracy to commit murder in aid of racketeering. After his conviction, three Assistant U.S. Attorneys (AUSAs) sent a letter to the Chairman of the New York Board of Parole, stating their belief “beyond a

MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Bernice C. Atchison, proceeding pro se, seeks damages from various Defendants associated with the series of lawsuits in this District that culminated in

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Pro se plaintiff Bobby D. Morgan, a prisoner who is currently incarcerated at the Hazelton Federal Correctional Institution in Bruceton Mills, West Virginia, has filed the instant action against the United States Parole Commission ("the Commission") and Commission Hearing Examiner Paul R. A. Howard ("Howard," and collectively, "Defendants") under

MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, learned from a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request in 2011 that records pertaining to his arrest and indictment in 1974 were destroyed in 1991. See Fletcher v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 905 F.Supp.2d 263

MEMORANDUM OPINION RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge The Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA” or the “Act”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq,, was enacted to promote transparency and accountability in how the federal government discharges its numerous and far-ranging responsibilities. This case raises a variety of questions relating

OPINION PETER G. SHERIDAN, District Judge. Before the Court are Motions for Summary Judgment brought by four groups of defendants referred to in this opinion as the Federal Defendants, the Camden City Defendants, the Camden County Defendants, and the Camden County Prosecutor’s Office Defendants (collectively, “Defendants”). This suit arises out of events that occurred primarily on the morning of January 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-119 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. BREAD FOR THE CITY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. DEPA

TERRENCE W. BOYLE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This cause comes before the Court on the United States' motion to dismiss; plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment; defendants Big South Wholesale of Virginia d/b/a Big Sky International, Big South Wholesale, Carpenter, and Small's motion for summary judgment; defendant Daniel's motion for summary judgment; and defendant Johnson's motion for summary judgment. The matters

JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: *513TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND A. History and Purposes of the Census...519 B. The Secretary's Authority Over the Census...521 C. The History of a Citizenship Question on the Census...524 D. Test

28 U.S.C. § 1500 (2006); United States v. Tohono O’odham Nation, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1723, 179 L.Ed.2d 723 (2011); Substantially the Same Operative Facts in Suit Pending Before a District Court. OPINION Bush, Judge. This suit, originally filed February 3, 2009, seeks money damages for hazardous waste contamination of land sold by the United States to plaintiffs. In an earlier opinio

ORDER (Pife’ Motion for Summary Judgment— ECF No. 67; Plfs’ Motion to Supplement Record—ECF No. 68; Defs’ Motion for Summary Judgment— ECF No. 75; Intervenors’ Motion for Summary Judgment—ECF No. 77; Defs’ Motion to Strike—ECF No. 102) MIRANDA M. DU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. SUMMARY Plaintiffs bring this action against the Department of the Interior (“DOI”), Bure

GILMAN, Circuit Judge: *1319 After reviewing the Defendants' Petition to Rehear, and having considered supplemental briefing by the parties, we vacate the original opinion in this case, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Southern Trust Metals, Inc. ,

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge Plaintiff Hall & Associates, a Washington, D.C., firm, recently won a lawsuit for its clients against the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA” or “the Agency”), the defendant in this case. See Iowa League of Cities v. EPA, 711 F.3d 844, 878 (8th Cir.2013). That success led

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-3050 MARGARITO CASTAÑON-NAVA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distri

457 B.R. 790 (2011) In re Chand K. SINGH, Debtor(s). Chand K. Singh, Plaintiff(s), v. U.S. Bank; Mortgage Electronic Information Systems, Inc.; Central Mortgage Company; and William G. Malcolm, Defendant(s). Bankruptcy No. 10-42260-E-13. Adversary No. 11-2049. Docket Control No. CJO-1. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division. September 16, 2011.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-3050 MARGARITO CASTAÑON-NAVA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distri