Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HERITAGE FOUNDATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 23-cv-1854 (DLF) DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this case, the Heritage Foundation and Mike Howell (together, “Heritage”) seek records from the U.S. Department of Justice relat

FILED UNITEI) sTATEs DISTRICT CoURT . APR.B g mg FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ` , u.s. manner a Ban griggs for the D\str\ct of Co\umb\a BAHIG F. BISHAY, ) Plaintiff, § v. l § Civil Action No. l:l9-cv-01045 (UNA) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., § , Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION This matterl is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiffs pro se complaint (“Compl.”) and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis The Court will grant the in forma pauperis application

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-1051 (EGS) v. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, et al., Defendants. PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25-1111 (EGS) U.S. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, et al.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ) TREASURY ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 12-mc-100 (EGS) ) PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY ) CORPORATION )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-3029 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE, Plaintiff, v. No. 19-cv-2698 (DLF) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Cause of Action Institute brings this suit alleging that the Department of Commerce has engaged in a policy or practice of vi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SIERRA CLUB, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-2315 (JEB) UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In early 2018, Plaintiff Sierra Club learned that Defendant United States Fish and Wildlife Service had initiated a review of the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. 13-cv-772 (CKK) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 5, 2019) This lawsuit arises from a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request that Plaintiff Ju- dicial Watch, Inc. made to Defendant United States Department of State in 2011. Plaintiff re- quested documents related to, among other things, former President Bill Clinton’s speaking en- gagemen

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed April 27, 2010, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed for fai

NO. COA13-860 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 1 April 2014 VINCENT BURLEY, Employee, Plaintiff, v. From the North Carolina Industrial Commission I.C. No. X52202 U.S. FOODS, INC., Employer, and INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Carrier, and GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC., Third Pa

Rogers, Circuit Judge: Judicial Watch unsuccessfully requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), release of five memoranda that memorialized advice to the President and his top national security advisers when the President was considering whether to order a military strike on Osama bin Laden's compound in Pakistan. On appeal, Judicial Watch challenges the government

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH December 30, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court

JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in the majority’s decision to vacate the district court’s order denying Maxi Dinga Sopo’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and to remand for entry of judgment in Mr. Sopo’s favor, ordering that Mr. Sopo promptly receive an individualized bond hearing. I join fully in Section V of the majority opinion, wh

Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge This miscellaneous action began six years ago when Petitioner, the United States Department of Treasury ("Treasury"), moved to quash Dennis Black, Charles Cunningham, Ken Hollis and the Delphi Salaried Retirees Association's (collectively, "Respondents") subpoena requesting documents related to Treasury's involvement in the termination of Respondents' pension plan. That subpoena arose

JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION...773 BACKGROUND...775 LEGAL STANDARDS...780 DISCUSSION...780 A. Standing...781 1. Injury-in-Fact...781 2. Traceability...785 3. NGO Plaintiffs' Standing...788 B. The Political Question

GEORGE J. HAZEL, United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Findings of Fact...692 A. The Secretary's Decision (Administrative Record)...693 1. Genesis of Secretary Ross's Interest in Including a Citizenship Question...693 2. Manufacturing DOJ's VRA Rationale...695 3. Census Burea

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 19-3265(CKK) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 28, 2020) This is a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) action, in w

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-1423 (JEB) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Cause of Action Institute caught wind of a congressional committee’s instruction to various government agencie

NANCY D. FREUDENTHAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Petitioner American Petroleum Institute (API) seeks review under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 - 706, of a final rule adopted by the federal agency respondents (collectively, ONRR) amending its civil penalty regulations,

*209 MEMORANDUM OPINION Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge Pending before the Court are the U.S. Department of Treasury’s contested privilege assertions that were not resolved by the Court’s December 20, 2016 Opinion ordering Treasury to: (1) produce all documents over