Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “416 U.S. 312 (1974)”
Adams v. U.S. Dep't of Laborpublic domain
J. Michelle Childs, United States District Judge Plaintiff Tempie L. Adams ("Adams") brings this action for review of the Department of Labor's ("DOL") denial of her claim for benefits under Part E of the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 ("EEOICPA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7384 - 7
State v. U.S. Dep't of Commercepublic domain
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION...773 BACKGROUND...775 LEGAL STANDARDS...780 DISCUSSION...780 A. Standing...781 1. Injury-in-Fact...781 2. Traceability...785 3. NGO Plaintiffs' Standing...788 B. The Political Question
Garcia v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Servicespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge As modernist architect Ludwig Mies van der Rohe once reflected, “It is not possible to go forward while looking back.” Yet that is exactly what Plaintiff Armando Moya *54 Garcia, an alien emigré
Seife v. U.S. Dep't of Statepublic domain
GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment in this Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") dispute between journalist and professor of journalism Charles Seife, appearing pro se , and the United States Department of State (the "State Department") that began with two July 22, 2014 requests for various records related to
Connecticut v. U.S. Dep't of the Interiorpublic domain
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge GRANTING MGM'S MOTION TO INTERVENE; GRANTING FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS I. INTRODUCTION The approval and regulation of gambling (or "gaming") on Native American ("tribal") land requires a careful balancing of tribal, state, and federal law, and this action implicates that balance. Plaintiffs the state of Con
New York v. U.S. Dep't of Commercepublic domain
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: *513TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND A. History and Purposes of the Census...519 B. The Secretary's Authority Over the Census...521 C. The History of a Citizenship Question on the Census...524 D. Test
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. U.S. Postal Servicepublic domain
OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge This is a case about an extra dab of glue — -just an extra bit of stickum worth over $1.25 million. Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Segerdahl Graphics, Inc.; and Aspen Marketing Services, LLC (collectively, Plaintiffs) mailed rectangular folded self-mailers in three separate mailings in 2009. To qualify for the most discounted automation rate, U.S. Postal
U.S. D.I.D. Corp. v. Windstream Communications, Inc.public domain
DRONEY, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents the question of whether a defendant may recover costs and damages from security posted by a plaintiff in obtaining a temporary restraining order (“TRO”), even though the plaintiff later filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice, preventing a final adjudication on the merits. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Furman, Judge) granted Plaintiff-
Elgin v. U.S. Department of the Treasurypublic domain
BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. A federal statute bars employment in the Executive Branch of citizens and resident aliens who were required to register for the draft with the Selective Service System and who “knowingly and willfully” did not do so before age twenty-six. In the district court, four plaintiffs, who are male United States citizens over age twenty-six, sought to challenge this statutory bar on constitutional grounds, failed
Aceves v. U.S. Bank National Ass'npublic domain
Opinion MALLANO, P. J. As alleged in this case, plaintiff, a married woman, obtained an adjustable rate loan from a bank to purchase real property secured by a deed of trust on her residence. About two years into the loan, she could not afford the monthly payments and filed for bankruptcy under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. §§ 701-784). She intended to convert the chapter 7 proceeding to a chapter
U.S. D.I.D. Corp. v. Windstream Communications, Inc.public domain
13‐206‐cv U.S. D.I.D. Corp. v. Windstream Communications, Inc. 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 5 August Term, 2013 6 No. 13‐206‐cv 7 U.S. D.I.D. CORP., 8 P
United States v. $255,427.15 in U.S. Currencypublic domain
ORDER J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge. This case comes before the Court on Claimants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. no. 43.) In their motion, Claimants seek dismissal of Plaintiffs Complaint or in the alternative pray that summary judgment be granted in their favor.1 To the extent set forth in this Order, Claimants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIE
Ramirez v. U.S. Customs and Border Protectionpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ JAIME RAMIREZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 07-65 (GK) ) U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER ) PROTECTION, et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting in part & Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting in part & Denying in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions
Jacques v. U.S. Bank N.A. (In Re Jacques)public domain
416 B.R. 63 (2009) In re Jude JACQUES, Debtor. Jude Jacques, Plaintiff, v. U.S. Bank N.A. in its capacity as Trustee for the Registered Holders of the MASTR Asset Backed Securities Series 2005-NC2 and Ocwen Loan Servicing, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-42279-ess. Adversary No. 09-1018-ess. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York. September 4, 2009.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA!, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 12-2039 (BAH) v. Consolidated with: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA!, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 12-2039 (BAH) v. Consolidated with: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology v. the U.S. Food & Drug Administrationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge Dental amalgam is a metallic compound that dentists use to fill cavities and repair structural deformities in teeth. One of its constituent parts is mercury. The Plaintiffs in this suit, which include a number of individuals and several not-for-profit organizations, fear that mercury rend
Lin v. U.S. Dept. of Justicepublic domain
02-4611-ag, 02-4629-ag, 03-40837-ag Lin et. al. v. U.S. Dept. of Justice 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2006 4 (Argued: March 7, 2007 Decided: July 16, 2007) 5 6 Docket Nos. 02-4611-ag, 02-4629-ag, 03-40837-ag 7 ___________
368 B.R. 375 (2007) In re Gabriel G. ATAMIAN, MD, MSEE, JD, Debtor. Gabriel G. Atamian, MD, MSEE, JD, Plaintiff, v. U.S. Department of Education, Secretary of U.S. Department of Education, and Signet Bank, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 00-05-20040 (MFW), Adversary No. A-06-50435 (MFW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. May 10, 2007.