Cases

USCA11 Case: 23-10105 Document: 35-1 Date Filed: 08/06/2025 Page: 1 of 23 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10105 ____________________ ISAAC LOPEZ-MARTINEZ,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN OVERSIGHT, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25-383 (TJK) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Earlier this year, then-Special Counsel Jack Smith delivered to the Department of Justice a two-volume report about the investigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA U.S. IMMIGRATION FUND-NY LLC, et al., Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 21-0358 (CKK) ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KRISTEN H. COLINDRES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 21-cv-348 (GMH) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs are a long-married couple with a young daughter who lived together in th

Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge Choe-Groves, Judge: Plaintiff U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc. ("U.S. Auto") imports vehicle repair parts. U.S. Auto initiated this action to contest the imposition of an enhanced single entry bond requirement assessed at three times the amount of the entire shipment value on each container of merchandise imported by U.S. Auto ("SEB Requirement") at the Port of Norfolk, which U.S. Custom

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE OF No. 20-35391 CALIFORNIA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF D.C. No. DELAWARE; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; 2:20-cv-00111- STATE OF HAWAII; STATE OF RAJ ILLINOIS; STATE OF MAINE; STATE OF MARYLAND; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF OPINION MICHIGAN; STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF NEW JERSEY; S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANGE SAMMA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-cv-1104 (ESH) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The United States has a long history of allowing noncitizens to serve in it

Case: 17-10636 Date Filed: 08/19/2020 Page: 1 of 86 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-10636 ________________________ Agency No. A072-565-851 PANKAJKUMAR S. PATEL, JYOTSNABEN P. PATEL, NISHANTKUMAR PATEL,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN OVERSIGHT et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 19-2519 (RDM) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Federal Records Act (“FRA”) prohibits agency personnel from using private ema

Case: 17-10636 Date Filed: 08/19/2020 Page: 1 of 86 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-10636 ________________________ Agency No. A072-565-851 PANKAJKUMAR S. PATEL, JYOTSNABEN P. PATEL, NISHANTKUMAR PATEL,

Justice KAGAN, concurring. I join the Court's opinion in full. I write separately to note that for me, unlike for Justice GINSBURG, see post, at 1817 (opinion concurring in part and concurring in judgment), the memorandum of agreement between the Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency is central to the disposition of this case. For an agency action to be final, "the action must be one by which

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 18-2029 (RDM) v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act (“WHA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1331 et seq., was ena

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to decide whether the district court abused its discretion when it permitted the government to dismiss its complaint for forfeiture without prejudice and whether the dismissal entitled the claimants to attorney's fees under the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act, see

S. THOMAS ANDERSON, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *604Plaintiffs Tennessee General Assembly, in its own right and on behalf of the State of Tennessee, State Senator John Stevens, individually and in his official capacity, and State Representative Terri Lynn Weaver, individually and in her official capacity, have brought this action conten

RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge Before the Court is a motion to dismiss by defendants for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), and plaintiffs' motion to strike defendants' notice of supplemental facts. Defs.' Mot. to Dismiss [Dkt # 18] ("Defs.' Mot."); Pls.' Mot. to Strike [Dkt # 27] ("Pls.' Mot."). In these motions, the parties dispute whether or not plaintiffs have standing to challeng

The party seeking class certification bears the burden of demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that all four requirements of Rule 23(a) and at least one of the three requirements under Rule 23(b) are met. See Dukes , 564 U.S. at 350-51,

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Major Matthew Seeger of the United States Army, Michael Schwartz, Cheryl Bormann, and Edwin Perry are lawyers employed by the United States Department of Defense (DoD) who represent detainees before a military commission at U.S. Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (NSGB). They bring this action under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA),

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA F I L E D OREGONIANS FOR FLOODPLAIN ) SEP 2 1 2018 PRoTECTIoN, er al., Clerk, U.S. Dlstrict & Bankruptcy ' ' f rthe DistrictofCo|umbia Plalntlffs, Courts o v. Civil Action No. 17-cv-1179 (RJL) THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., Defendant. : MEM()R NDUM OPINION (seprember Ll 2018) [Dkts ## 18, 27] \./\/\/\_/VVV\/\/ Before the Court is a motion to dismiss by defendants for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Fed. R. Ci

TREVOR N. MCFADDEN, United States District Judge In this suit, three associations representing California ranchers and farmers challenge the federal designation of over 1.8 million acres in the Sierra Nevada mountains as critical habitat for three amphibian species. Before me are two Motions to Dismiss: one from the Government and one from Defendant-Intervenors (collectively, Defendants), each raising jurisdictional and pleading ar

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DUNCAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge KING joined. DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Dawn Bennett and her firm, Bennett Group Financial Services, LLC, (collectively, “Bennett”) appeal the district court’s dismissal on jurisdictional grounds of her suit challenging the constitutionality of the administrative enf