Cases

S. THOMAS ANDERSON, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *604Plaintiffs Tennessee General Assembly, in its own right and on behalf of the State of Tennessee, State Senator John Stevens, individually and in his official capacity, and State Representative Terri Lynn Weaver, individually and in her official capacity, have brought this action conten

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge GRANTING MGM'S MOTION TO INTERVENE; GRANTING FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS I. INTRODUCTION The approval and regulation of gambling (or "gaming") on Native American ("tribal") land requires a careful balancing of tribal, state, and federal law, and this action implicates that balance. Plaintiffs the state of Con

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILMER GARCIA RAMIREZ, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 18-508 (RC) : v. : : U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS

ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND DAVID ALAN EZRA, Senior District Judge. On July 22, 2013, the Court heard oral argument on the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants SDC Montana Bakken Exploration, LLC, Val Verde Investments, LLC, and Ringo Shapiro (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. # 16.) Amy Davis, Esq., and

Tatel, Circuit Judge: Kaspersky Lab is a Russian-based cybersecurity company that provides products and services to customers around the world. Recently, however, Kaspersky lost an important client: the United States government. In September 2017, based on concerns that the Russian government could exploit Kaspersky's access to federal computers for ill, the Acting Secretary of Homeland

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Nos. 11-11021 & 11-11067 AUG 12, 2011 JOHN LEY

BARKETT, Circuit Judge: These two interlocutory appeals arise out of one lawsuit pertaining to the allocation of water stored in Georgia’s Lake Lanier, which is controlled by the Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”). The dispute involves the Corps, the States of Georgia, Florida, and Alabama, which are all affected by the amount of water flowing out of Lake Lanier through the Apa

OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from a civil suit based on diversity jurisdiction brought by appellee, Fannie Harrison (“Harrison”), against appellant, Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A. (“Nissan”), seeking damages for alleged defects in the 1994 Nissan Sentra that Harrison purchased on July 11, 1994. Nissan moved to dismiss

617 F.Supp. 729 (1985) JHJ LIMITED I v. CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. Civ. A. No. 82-0882-A. United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana. September 11, 1985. *730 F. Neelis Roberts, Gordon, Arata, McCollam, Stuart & Duplantis, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff. John C. Christian, M. Taylor Darden, Milling, Benson, Woodward, Hill

615 F.3d 83 (2010) Ira NATHEL, Tracy Nathel, Sheldon Nathel, Ann M. Nathel, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Docket No. 09-1955-ag. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: February 3, 2010. Decided: June 2, 2010. *84 Hugh Janow, Pearl River, NY, for

FRIEDMAN, Chief Judge: These cross-appeals challenge (1) a jury award of $9.2 million in favor of U.S. Industries, Inc. (“USI”), against Blake Construction Co., Inc. (“Blake”), in a suit for breach of contract, (2) the district court’s grant of judgment n. o. v. in favor of Blake on an additional $400,000 the jury awarded USI on another claim, and (3) the district court’s grant

STUCKY, Judge, with whom OHLSON, Judge, joins (dissenting): Stare decisis is defined as “[t]he doctrine of precedent, under which a court must follow earlier judicial decisions when the same points arise again in litigation.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1626 (10th ed, 2014). The doctrine encompasses at least two distinct concepts, only one of which is raised by this ease: (1) “an appellate court[ ] must ad

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This action concerns whether the Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") acted lawfully when it reduced Medicare payments worth billions of dollars to private institutions, to correct what it views as a fundamental misalignment of Medicare programs. Plaintiffs, a group of hospital associations and non-profit hospitals,

JUSTICE WECHT, Concurring I join the Majority Opinion in full. I write separately because, although the Majority applies the operative constitutional standard, see Majority Opinion at 1120 (citing Lutz v. Armour , 151 A.2d 108, 110 (Pa. 1959) ) ("[T]o pass constitutional muster, the Co

397 F.Supp. 476 (1975) Reese L. THORNTON et al. v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A. INC., et al. Civ. A. No. 18431. United States District Court, N. D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. May 29, 1975. *477 Ross & Finch, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs. N. Forrest Montet and Malcolm P. Smith, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants.

[J-8-2018] [MO: Baer, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT ANTHONY M. RUFO AND TR GETZ, LP : No. 22 EAP 2017 : : Appeal from the Order of v. : Commonwealth Court entered on : 12/22/2

584 F.3d 682 (2009) Teodulo CANTU-DELGADILLO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. No. 08-60122. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. October 1, 2009. *685 Lisa S. Brodyaga, Refugio de Rio Grande, San Benito, TX, for Petitioner. Shelly R. Goad, Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, Barry

OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: Defendant FCA U.S. LLC, more commonly known as “Chrysler,” manufactures vehicles that have a key component known as the “Totally Integrated Power Module,” or “TIPM.” The TIPM functions as *216a vehicle’s electronic nerve center, and it is responsible for controlling and distributi

RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge: In this appeal we are asked to review the constitutionality of a local ordinance which requires pawnbrokers in Dade County to close their business at 5:00 p.m. Plaintiff Cash Inn, a pawnshop located in Dade County, maintains that this regulation arbitrarily interferes with its constitutional right to engage in a lawful business. It contends that the

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge. Plaintiffs Ariana Klay, Elle Helmer, Nicole McCoy, Robin Kahle, Lamanda Cummings, Rebecca Blumer, Erica Dorn, Mariel Marmol, Christian Everage, Eric Pratt, Janet Galla, and Carla Butcher have filed this action against defendants Leon Panetta, Secretary of Defense; Robert M. Gates and Donald