Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:25-cv-00943 (TNM) v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER Advocacy organizations serving imm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:25-cv-00943 (TNM) v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER Advocacy organizations serving imm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JENNER & BLOCK LLP, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25-916 (JDB) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In our constitutional order, few stars are as fixed as the principle that no official “can prescribe what shall be orthodox in polit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) VERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 25-cv-1643 (APM)

USCA11 Case: 20-11654 Date Filed: 02/18/2022 Page: 1 of 40 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-11654 ____________________ RUPERTO HERNANDEZ ZARATE, Petitioner, versus U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

"A principal feature of the removal system is the broad discretion exercised by immigration officials." Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. at 396, 132 S.Ct. 2492. ICE instructs its agents and employees on its discretio

RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. 24. Plaintiffs are twenty-eight individuals who object to various actions allegedly taken by Israel or Israeli citizens against Palestinians. They bring this case against the Department of Defense, the Department of the Treasury, and the Department of State, and those Departments' Secretaries in their official capaci

JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION...773 BACKGROUND...775 LEGAL STANDARDS...780 DISCUSSION...780 A. Standing...781 1. Injury-in-Fact...781 2. Traceability...785 3. NGO Plaintiffs' Standing...788 B. The Political Question

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-3050 MARGARITO CASTAÑON-NAVA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distri

ROGER W. TITUS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On October 5, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint seeking to enjoin rescission of a program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals ("DACA"), asserting a variety of claims as to why the rescission was unlawful. See ECF No. 1. Plaintiffs are a number of individual participants in that program known as "Dreamers," as well as a series of special interest organizations that de

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-3050 MARGARITO CASTAÑON-NAVA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distri

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-3050 MARGARITO CASTAÑON-NAVA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distri

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, ) UNITED STATES HOUSE OF ) REPRESENTATIVES, ) ) Plaintiff, )

801 F.Supp.2d 383 (2011) ANCIENT COIN COLLECTORS GUILD v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Department of Homeland Security, et al. Civil Action No. CCB-10-322. United States District Court, D. Maryland. August 8, 2011. *386 Peter Karl Tompa, Jason Herbert Ehrenberg, Bailey and Ehrenberg PLLC, Washington, DC, for Ancient Coin C

Overview HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge. This case touches on the seeming tension between the statutory powers possessed by receivers to wind up insolvent insurance companies and the general supervisory powers of Missouri trial courts overseeing the administration of the receivership of these companies. This case stems from a decision by a trial judge to order an audit in a four year old pending petition and

676 F.Supp. 6 (1987) U.S. Congressman Robert K. DORNAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, U.S. Secretary of State, Director, Central Intelligence Agency, Ronald W. Reagan, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 87-1414. United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 20, 1987. Carl L. Shipley, Marion H. Smoak, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs. D

OPINION RANDALL, Judge. C & C Teletronics (C & C), a subcontractor, sued U.S.West, the general contractor on a project to install a new phone system at the University of Minnesota (U of M), and the U of M alleging breach of contract. U.S. West and the U of M cross-claimed against each other for breach of contract. C & C’s employees, Fran Collins, et al (employees), moved unsuccessfully to interv

BECKER, Circuit Judge, concurring in part: I join in Parts II and IV of the majority’s opinion, and in its judgment. I disagree fundamentally with the majority’s analysis in Part III however, and write separately to explain my views. I. Central to the majority’s finding that CICA is not unconstitutional is its conviction that the Comptroller General occupies an inde

787 F.2d 875 54 USLW 2515, 33 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) 74,321 AMERON, INC.andUnited States Senate, Intervenor,Thomas P. O'Neill, Speaker of House of Representatives andBipartisan Leadership Group, Intervenors, Appellees,v.U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; Lt. Col. Michael K.Collmeyer, Contracting Officer, United States ofAmerica; and Spiniello Construction Company.Appeal of UNITED STATES of

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: In 1983, the Office of Management and Budget issued the current version of its Circular A-76. The Circular establishes executive branch policy for the performance of commercial activities. It guides agency managers in deciding whether a given activity should be performed “in-house” by government workers or should be “contracted out” to the private sector. In collective bargain