⚖ SoapBox law
ConstitutionTreatiesCasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsPrivacy lawAppeals & writsYour rightsDoctrinesMaximsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “317 U.S. 111 (1942)”

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022-07-29 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 21-3005 Document: 010110717852 Date Filed: 07/29/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 29, 2022
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-11-20 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GRANT TURNER, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-2885 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. AGENCY FOR GLOBAL MEDIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORAN
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015-05-28 · Published · cited 17× · 787 F.3d 797; 2015 FED App. 0102P; 40 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 137; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8803; 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,317; 2015 WL 3404658
*801 OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Defendant U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. (“Defendant” or “USBII”) appeals from judgment following a jury trial on Plaintiff Michael Rhinehimer’s claim that he was disciplined and fired in retaliation for his complaint about fraud perpetrated on USB
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILMER GARCIA RAMIREZ, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 18-508 (RC) : v. : : U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS
California Court of Appeal · 2016-05-18 · Published · cited 64× · 247 Cal. App. 4th 552; 16 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5095; 201 Cal. Rptr. 3d 218; 2016 WL 2941194; 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 399
*555 Opinion NARES, J. This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. The homeowner, Monica Sciarratta, alleges that as a result of a void assignment of her promissory note and deed of trust, the entity that conducted a nonjudicial foreclosure sale on her home had no interest in either t
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025-12-16 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 24-10736 Document: 122-1 Date Filed: 12/16/2025 Page: 1 of 21 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10736 ____________________ NATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS UNITED,
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2021-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-1784 (Filed: August 19, 2021) ) Suit for breach of contract; indemnity CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. et al., ) clause in contracts for production of high- ) octane gasoline during World War II; Plaintiffs,
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2011-08-18 · Published · cited 5× · 809 F. Supp. 2d 582; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92357; 2011 WL 3652436
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants’ Rule 12 Motions to Dismiss (doc. 19), filed January 1, 2011. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds the Motions should be and hereby are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. *585I. BACKGROUND
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011-08-12 · Published · cited 0×
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Nos. 11-11021 & 11-11067 AUG 12, 2011 JOHN LEY
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012-12-07 · Published · cited 2× · 701 F.3d 1345; 74 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 655; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25106; 2012 WL 6061706
DUBINA, Chief Judge: Appellant 907 Whitehead Street, Inc., d/b/a Ernest Hemingway Home and Museum (“the Museum”), appeals the district court’s post-trial order denying the Museum declaratory and injunctive relief. The Museum challenges the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and its Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (collectively the “USDA”) to regulate t
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011-11-10 · Published · cited 0× · 825 F. Supp. 2d 882; 108 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7555; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130144; 2011 WL 5593141
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANTS FIFTH THIRD MORTGAGE AND FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION AND DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. This case was commenced by plaintiff Certain Underwriters of Lloyds, London as an interpleader action, with Lloyds seeking to deposit in Court the proceed
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012-12-07 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 11-14217 Date Filed: 12/07/2012 Page: 1 of 13 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 11-14217 ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 4:09-cv-10050-JEM 907 WHITEHEAD STREET, INC., d.b.
District Court, S.D. New York · 2001-05-17 · Published · cited 13× · 262 B.R. 223; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6612
262 B.R. 223 (2001) In re U.S. LINES, INC., Asbestosis Claimants, Appellant, v. U.S. LINES REORGANIZATION TRUST, U.S. Lines, Inc., Appellee. No. 00 Civ. 3800 RWS. United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 17, 2001. *224 *225 *226 Maritime Asbestosis
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2004-06-25 · Published · cited 10× · 91 P.3d 1194; 278 Kan. 166; 2004 Kan. LEXIS 409
278 Kan. 166 (2004) 91 P.3d 1194 GARY STONE and DANIELLE STONE, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. U.S.D. No. 222, Defendant/Appellant, and GARY HADDAN, d/b/a HADDAN WRECKER & EXCAVATING, Defendant. No. 90,317. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed June 25, 2004. *167 Teresa L. Sittenauer, of Fisher,
Idaho Supreme Court · 2003-11-25 · Published · cited 5× · 80 P.3d 1088; 139 Idaho 487; 2003 Ida. LEXIS 169
80 P.3d 1088 (2003) 139 Idaho 487 Ronald Dean REECE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY, INC., a Delaware corporation, Larry Bull, an individual, and Gerald Aznoe, an individual, Defendants-Respondents. No. 28054. Supreme Court of Idaho, Pocatello, September 2003 Term. November 25, 2003. *1089
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002-03-26 · Published · cited 4× · 284 F.3d 1128
OPINION TROTT, Circuit Judge. OVERVIEW U.S. West Communications, Inc., now Qwest Corporation (“Qwest”), appeals the district court’s Burford abstention order remanding this quo warranto/declaratory judgment action to state court. In response, the City of Tucson (“Tucson”) challenges our jurisdiction to hear Qwest’s appeal. Because we conclude that: (1) the' requirements fo
Washington Supreme Court · 2018-05-10 · Published · cited 18× · 416 P.3d 1205; 190 Wash. 2d 612
/FTUEv X IN CLERKS OFFICE X This opinion was filed for record 'agRBE COUOT.afOlE <r WSHNBTOM at onf DATg WAY 1 0 9niii cmEFJusnce SUSAN L. CARLSON SUPREME COURT CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CERTIFICAT
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010-02-08 · Published · cited 1× · 695 F. Supp. 2d 609; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10761
695 F.Supp.2d 609 (2010) FLEXSYS AMERICA LP, Plaintiff, v. KUMHO TIRE U.S.A., INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 5:05CV156. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. February 8, 2010. *610 John C. Fairweather, Amanda M. Leffler, Lisa S. Delgrosso, Brouse McDowell, David C. Minc, Akron, OH, Robert M. Masters, Bhas
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2009-06-01 · Published · cited 3× · 620 F. Supp. 2d 981; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46107; 2009 WL 1529606
620 F.Supp.2d 981 (2009) PRECISION PRESS, INC., d/b/a Anderson Brothers Printing Company, Plaintiff, v. MLP U.S.A., INC., Defendant. No. C09-4005-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. June 1, 2009. *983 Jeff W. Wright, Sioux City, IA, for Plaintiff. Gary D. Santella, Gary Vist, Masuda, Funai, Eife
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2012-06-14 · Published · cited 0× · 895 F. Supp. 2d 794; 177 Oil & Gas Rep. 721; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133592; 2012 WL 3990021
MEMORANDUM RULING REBECCA F. DOHERTY, District Judge. Pending before this Court are two motions filed by defendant Sea Robin Pipeline Co., L.L.C. (“Sea Robin”), as follows: (1) Motion for Summary Judgment on State Law Grounds [Doc. 80], and (2) Motion for Summary Judgment on Federal Preemption [Doc. 81]. Both motions are opposed by plaintiff Medco Energi US, L.L.C. (“Medco”) [Docs. 84 & 85]