Cases

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. ALBERT F. VERGARA, Appellant. No. 2 CA-CR 2023-0081 Filed March 26, 2025 Appeal from the Superior Court in Pima

J-A27022-20 2022 PA Super 69 FREDERICK E. OBERHOLZER, JR AND : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DENISE L. OBERHOLZER : PENNSYLVANIA : : v. : : : SIMON AND TOBY GALAPO : : No. 794 EDA 2020

OPINION OF THE COURT MELLOY, Circuit Judge. The filing of a bankruptcy petition operates as an automatic stay of debt collection activities outside of bankruptcy proceedings. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). If “an individual [is] injured by any willful violation of [the] stay,” that individual “shall recover actual damages, including costs and attorneys’ fees, and,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2284 F.J.A.P., Petitioner, v. MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2284 F.J.A.P., Petitioner, v. MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2284 F.J.A.P., Petitioner, v. MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2284 F.J.A.P., Petitioner, v. MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2284 F.J.A.P., Petitioner, v. MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2284 F.J.A.P., Petitioner, v. MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________

812 F.Supp.2d 228 (2011) Jeffrey LAX, Plaintiff, v. 29 WOODMERE BOULEVARD OWNERS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 10-CV-4008 (JFB)(WDW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 23, 2011. *230 Michael Todd Parker, Moskowitz & Book LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. David A. Boyar, D'Amato & Lynch, New Yo

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 6, 2020 Decided June 23, 2020 No. 19-5298 MAKE THE ROAD NEW YORK, ET AL., APPELLEES v. CHAD F. WOLF, ACTING SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, ET AL., APPELLANTS Appeal from the United States District Court

OPINION OF THE COURT WOLFE, Judge: After a contested trial of the facts, a court-martial with enlisted representation convicted appellant, Sergeant (SGT) Eric F. Kelly, of abusive sexual contact and sexual assault in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920 (2012 & Supp. I 2014) [hereinafter UCMJ]. Appellant brings numerous claims of error to our attention, seven of whi

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT DENNIS R. DI RICCO, et al., ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) WD86327 ) (consolidated with WD86329 MISSOURI COMMISSIONER OF ) and WD86330) SECURITIES, et al.,

995 A.2d 611 (2010) 296 Conn. 524 In re TAYLER F. et al.[*] No. 18280. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued February 11, 2010. Decided June 8, 2010. *616 Jon D. Golas, Manchester, for the appellant (respondent mother). Benjamin Zivyon, assistant attorney general, with whom, on th

895 F.Supp. 1463 (1995) Stevana CASE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 233, JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 94-2100-GTV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 25, 1995. *1464 *1465 J. Eugene Balloun, David J. Waxse, John T. Bullock, Shook, Hard

TARNOW, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which MOORE and KETHLEDGE, JJ., joined. KETHLEDGE, J. (pg. 645-46), delivered a separate concurring opinion. OPINION TARNOW, District Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants F.H., represented by his next friend and mother Sandra Fay Hall, and Sandra Fay Hall individually, filed suit against Defendant-Appellee Memphis City Schools (MCS) alleging

Tax refund suit; Cross-motions for summary judgment under RCFC 56; Deductibility of “theft” loss under I.R.C. § 165(e)(3); Definition of “theft;” Edwards', Reliance upon state law definitions of crimes contrary to normal rules for interpreting Federal tax statutes; Burnet v. Harmel; Anomalous results produced by incorporating state criminal law into Federal taxing statute;

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *68An energy consulting company and its employee and managing member challenge FERC's assessment of civil penalties against them for violating FERC's anti-manipulation rule, alleging that the action brought in this Court by FERC is time-barred under the general statute of limitations,