Cases

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Tax, and Costs, filed April 24, 2018 (Doc. 29)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on August 8, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether time that the Plaintiffs' counsel Mr. Olsi Vrapi spent in *10

679 F.Supp.2d 330 (2010) U.S. UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Rachel LANDAU, Mordechi Landau, Vintaje General Construction Inc., Edna Deveaux, Public Administrator of Kings County, as administrator of the Estate of Julius Drecketts, Ranjette Combs, Bernard Barham, Allstate Insurance Company a/s/o Miguel Medrano and Vincent Alexis, Greenwich Insurance Company a/s/o Rachel Landau, Defendants. Rachel Landau and Mordechi Landau, Thi

361 F.Supp.2d 470 (2005) James L. MILLER v. U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC., et al. No. CIV.A. CCB04-1129. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 23, 2005. *471 *472 Benjamin Rosenberg, T. Christine Pham, Rosenberg Martin Funk Greenberg LLP, Paul Mark Sandler, Robert B. Levin, Shapiro Sher Gu

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Nos. 11-11021 & 11-11067 AUG 12, 2011 JOHN LEY

UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. W&O, INC., d.b.a. Rustic Inn, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 98-5515, 98-5646. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 30, 2000. Appeals from th

PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 30 2000

770 N.E.2d 177 (2002) 199 Ill.2d 325 264 Ill.Dec. 283 BELLEVILLE TOYOTA, INC., Appellee, v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., et al., Appellants. No. 90340. Supreme Court of Illinois. March 15, 2002. Rehearing Denied May 29, 2002. *181 Thomas M. Crisham, Michael C.

OPINION ROGERS, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs are hospitals that provide services to patients under both Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare beneficiaries are billed co-payments and deductibles for the services provided to them, and in some cases the Medicare beneficiaries cannot or will not pay. The beneficiaries in this case also have Medicaid as a secondary

Taxation of Costs; Fees of the Reporter for Trial Transcripts; Fees for Witnesses; Costs for Duplication of Papers; Costs Incident to Taking Depositions. OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING TAXATION OF COSTS WHEELER, Judge. In this complex tax refund case, the Court initially found in favor

KELLY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I agree that the driver of the Tornado bus willingly gave Corporal Goodman permission to search the bus for contraband. When Goodman looked in the luggage compartment and noted one bag separated from the others and without a visible name tag, he assumed-without any further inquiry-that the bag was abandoned, thereby giving him the right to search. Cf. Sander

Taxation of Costs; Fees of the Clerk; Fees of the Reporter for Trial Transcripts; Fees for Witnesses; Costs for Duplication of Papers; Costs Incident to Taking Depositions; Other Costs; Downward Reduction for Limited Success. WHEELER, Judge. OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING TAXATION OF COSTS. In this Fifth Amendment taking case, the C

ANDREWS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE: Plaintiffs Sanofi and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC (collectively, "Plaintiffs") bring this consolidated patent infringement case against Defendants Watson Laboratories, Inc. and Sandoz Inc. (collectively, "Defendants"). (C.A. No. 15-415-RGA, D.I. 188 at pp. 1, 3).1 This opinion addresses allegations of infringement and invalidity with respect to

UNITED STATES, Appellee v. David J. PHILLIPS, Corporal U.S. Marine Corps, Appellant No. 11-0148 Crim. App. No. 200900568 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued April 6, 2011 Decided June 28, 2011 STUCKY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in

CRAWFORD, Judge (concurring in the result): The plain error issue is not unique to military practice. The Rules for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) are modeled after the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and accordingly, we should follow the guidance provided by our superior court in applying or interpreting our rules. Specifically, we should apply Supreme Court precedent in determining whether we should correc

970 F.2d 1206 1992 A.M.C. 2816 CONOCO, INC.; E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co., Petitionersin No. 91-3589,v.Samuel K. SKINNER, Secretary of Transportation; Warren G.Leback, Maritime Administrator; and the UnitedStates of America.CONOCO, INC.; E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co., Appellantsin No. 91-3920,v.Samuel K. SKINNER, Secretary of Transportation; Nicholas F.Brady; William A.

(Slip Opinion) Application of 18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(1) and (c)(1) to Young Adults Section 922(b)(1) and (c)(1) of title 18, U.S. Code, is unconstitutional as applied to young adults between eighteen and twenty who seek to purchase handguns. The provision prevents young adults, who are members of “the people” to whom the Second Amendment applies, from owning “arms” in common use for self-defense. This places the burden on the government to show that th

UNITED STATES, Appellant v. Christopher A. QUICK, Sergeant U.S. Marine Corps, Appellee No. 15-0347 Crim. App. No. 201300341 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued May 12, 2015 Decided August 11, 2015 ERDMANN, C.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which RYAN

338 F.Supp.2d 931 (2004) Debra KEACH and Patricia Sage, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. TRUST COMPANY, N.A., et al., Defendants. No. 01-1168. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois. Peoria Division. October 8, 2004. *932 Dean B. Rhoads, Robert Rhode, Edward Sutkowski, Steven Oates, Sean Anderson, Sutkowski & Rhoads, Peoria, IL, for

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER E. RICHARD WEBBER, Senior District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Kevin D. Cowden’s Motion for Bill of Costs [ECF No. 252]. I. BACKGROUND This case arises out of injuries Plaintiff sustained while working as a conductor on a locomotive for Defendant BNSF Railway Company. On November 8, 2013, a jury returne

ORDER DONALD L. GRAHAM, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants’ Verified Motion to Tax Costs [D.E. 72], THE COURT has conducted a de novo review of the file and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. THIS MATTER was assigned to the Honorable United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman. The Magistrate Judge