Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge Pro se Plaintiff Luis Ivan Poblete brings this action against the U.S. Marshals Service, two judges of the D.C. Superior Court, and a D.C.-based law firm. Dkt. 1-1 at 7, 21. Poblete filed suit in D.C. Superior Court, but the U.S. Marshals Service removed the action here pur

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1796 ___________________________ Anastasia Wullschleger, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; Geraldine Brewer Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Ro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR IMMIGRATION REFORM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:20-cv-03438 (TNM) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Two Arizona ranchers claim that in the Bi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Plaintiffs, and WATER WORKS AND SANITARY SEWER BOARD OF THE CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. Civil Action No. 15-696 (EGS) UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, et al., Defendants, and STATE OF GEORGIA, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. ALABAMA POWER CO

FAY, Circuit Judge: Marc Wiersum appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his alleged wrongful-termination action, filed under the Florida Whistleblower Act (“FWA”),1 which the district judge determined was preempted by the National Bank Act (“NBA”).2 We affirm. I. BACKGROUND On March 15, 2013, U.S. Bank, N.A., a federally chartered

C. Georgia v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (N.D. Ga. 2:01-cv-26) Shortly after the SeFPC case was filed, Georgia requested that the Corps allocate water from Lake Lanier to meet the needs of metropolitan Atlanta through 2030. The Corps did not respond to Georgia's request, and Georgia filed suit in the Northern District of Georgia. See

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF ALABAMA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-607 (JDB) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, et al., Defendants, THE STATE OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. MEMORANDUM OPINION Alabama filed this lawsuit to set aside a d

Case: 13-11052 Document: 00512940123 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/19/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

739 F.Supp.2d 185 (2010) Ayman Nabil GHALY, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Mike Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture, Defendants. No. 06-CV-3744 (ENV). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 16, 2010. *187 Ayman Nabil Ghaly, San Diego, CA, pro se. Catherine Mary Mirabile, Zachary A. Cunha, Unite

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EARTHWORKS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 09-1972 (HHK/JMF) U.S. DEPT. OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER There has been assigned to me the task of reviewing a large number of documents which the Department of Interio

Case: 14-12357 Date Filed: 03/23/2015 Page: 1 of 51 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-12357 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:13-cv-02136-WMA BLACK WARRIOR RIVERKEEPER, INC., DEFENDERS O

408 F.Supp.2d 866 (2006) The NAVAJO NATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. FOREST SERVICE, et al., Defendants. Nos. CV 05-1824-PCT-PGR, CV 05-1914-PCT-EHC, CV-05-1949-PCT-NVW, CV 05-1966-PCT-JAT. United States District Court, D. Arizona. January 11, 2006. *867 *868 *

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Nos. 11-11021 & 11-11067 AUG 12, 2011 JOHN LEY

738 F.Supp.2d 927 (2010) Donovan and Anna DYRDAL, Petitioners, v. ENBRIDGE (U.S.), INC., Respondent. Civ. No. 10-1970 (RHK/LIB). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. September 14, 2010. Jon Erik Kingstad, Kingstad Law Office, Oakdale, MN, for Petitioners. Stephanie A. Ball, Fryberger, Buchanan, Smith & Frederick, P.A., Duluth, MN, for Respondent.</

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT GENERALI-U.S. BRANCH, Appellant, v. BARRY SPRINGEL and WENDY SPRINGEL, Appellees. No. 4D2025-1824 [August 19, 2026] Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County;

(2008) SHIRE U.S., INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON MATTHEY, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 07-CV-2958. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 14, 2008. MEMORANDUM & ORDER RUFE, District Judge. This is a declaratory judgment action involving a question of patent infringement. Presently before the Court i

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: At issue is cost-allocation for privately owned pipelines under the Houston Ship Channel (channel) being relocated as part of the project by the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Port of Houston Authority to widen and deepen the channel. The Corps and the Port appeal the partial summary judgment awarded the pipeline owners:

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN W. POTTER, District Judge: This cause is before the Court on defendant’s unopposed motion for summary judgment on all of plaintiffs claims. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment is proper only where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c)

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1824 DAVID A. FIELD, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SHEET METAL WORKERS' NATIONAL PENSION FUND, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Indira Talwani, U.S. District Judge]

WILSON, Circuit Judge: We vacate the opinion cited at Corbitt v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 573 F.3d 1223 (11th Cir.2009), and substitute the following in its place. The plaintiffs, David Corbitt and Alexander Raya (collectively, “Appellants”), appeal the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (“Home Depot”), on their sexual harassment and retaliation claims