Cases

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. This case presents a matter of first impression in our circuit, requiring us to interpret 11 U.S.C. § 107(b)(2), which provides an exception to the rule of public access to papers filed in a bankruptcy case for material that is “scandalous or defamatory.” Appellants Charles and Gary Gitto (collectively, “the Gittos”), who were formerly associated with a compa

OPINION SUE WALKER, Justice. I. Introduction In the underlying case involving juvenile R.J.D., Respondent, the Honorable Jean Boyd, sua sponte ordered the courtroom closed to the public and to members of the media during R.J.D.’s certification hearing and during the setting for R.J.D.’s determinate sentence trial. Relators Fort Worth Star-Telegram; Dallas Morning News; CBS Sta

462 B.R. 42 (2011) In re BORDERS GROUP, INC., et al., Debtors.[1] No. 11-10614 (MG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. December 7, 2011. *44 Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP, By: Jeffery R. Gleit, Esq., Nii-Amar Amamoo, Esq., New York, NY, for Borders Group, Inc. Lowenstein Sandler PC, By: Timoth

Kenton-Walker, JANET, J. Plaintiffs, who are or have been adult newspaper carriers for the Worcester Telegram & Gazette Corporation (“the Telegram”), bring this action against the Telegram, alleging the Telegram has misclassified them as independent contractors and thereby deprived them of certain rights under state law.2 Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges the following: violations of the Massachusett

Kinder, C. Jeffrey, J. INTRODUCTION This is a defamation action arising from statements concerning Robert Delle (“Delle”), published by the Worcester Telegram & Gazette (“T&G”). Delle avers that these statements were libelous and that he has suffered economic harm and personal injury as a result of their publication. Before the court is Delie’s *240

OPINION OF THE COURT Lorraine S. Miller, J. In what became widely known as the Texas Cadet Murder— the brutal murder of a beautiful coed by two dysfunctionally possessive 18-year-old military cadets, David Graham and Diane Zamora — the defining images were presented through 16 prom and “vanity” photographs of the slain 16 year old, Adrienne Jones. Many of the photographs appearing in the print and television

782 F.Supp.2d 1223 (2011) Kellee CARMAN, Plaintiff, v. The CBE GROUP, INC., Defendant. Case No. 09-2538-JAR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 23, 2011. *1225 Raymond E. Probst, Jr., Probst Law Firm, Kansas City, KS, John D. Barker, Krohn & Moss, Ltd., Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff. Daniel S. Rabin, Rache

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-14-00144-CV IN RE FORT WORTH STAR- RELATORS TELEGRAM; DALLAS MORNING NEWS; CBS STATIONS GROUP OF TEXAS LLC; KXAS-TV; NW COMMUNICATIONS OF TEXAS, INC., ON BEHALF OF STATION KDFW FOX 4; AND WFAA-TV, INC. ---------- ORIGIN

OPINION OF THE COURT Renwick J. This is a case of a Wall Street firm (Goldman Sachs) being accused of selling mortgage-backed securities it knew to be “junk” and then betting against the same securities as the 2007 financial crisis unfolded. Specifically, plaintiff, Basis Yield Alpha Fund (Basis), a fund managed by an Australian hedge fund, Basis Capital Fund Management, commenced this action against severa

OPINION OF THE COURT Renwick J. This is a case of a Wall Street firm (Goldman Sachs) being accused of selling mortgage-backed securities it knew to be “junk” and then betting against the same securities as the 2007 financial crisis unfolded. Specifically, plaintiff, Basis Yield Alpha Fund (Basis), a fund managed by an Australian hedge fund, Basis Capital Fund Management, commenced this action against severa

525 S.E.2d 786 (2000) MULTIMEDIA PUBLISHING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC., d/b/a Asheville Citizen Times Publishing Company, a North Carolina Corporation, Plaintiff, v. HENDERSON COUNTY and Henderson County Board of Commissioners, Defendants. No. COA99-520. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 15, 2000. *787 Kelly & Rowe, P

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS R&M MIXED BEVERAGE § CONSULTANTS, INC., No. 08-17-00054-CV § Appellant, Appeal from the § v.

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-21-00059-CV THERESA HALL, Appellant V. HOUSTONIAN INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 269th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020-03094 Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Opinion by Justice Stevens

EFiled: Apr 21 2025 05: o1P EDT Lin Transaction ID 76118162 “ify 4A") Case No. 2024-1334-JTL 3 Nee ish IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ey orbs mee WORKCO, INC. d/b/a TOKU, Plaintiff, C.A. No. 2024-1334-JTL Vv. LIQUIFI, INC. and BENJAMIN SNIPES, Defendants. ORDER ADOPTIN SPECIAL DISCOVERY MAGISTRATE’S REPORT WHEREAS: A. On February 6, 2025, WorkCo., Inc. d/b/a Toku (“Toku”) moved to compel LiquiFi, Inc. to apply Toku’s proposed search terms to identify responsive docume

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KELLY BARBEY and THE BERMUDA ) HESED FOUNDATION, a Bermuda Trust, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0107-PAF ) CEREGO, INC., a Delaware corporation, )

Torada, J. The plaintiff brought this action in the Superior Court against the defendants for violations of G. L. c. 93 (the Massachusetts Antitrust Act), and G. L. c. 93A (the Consumer Protection Act), based on the defendants’ alleged refusal to publish in their monthly newspaper an advertisement for the plaintiff’s Internet service, which provides information and services to the residents of Rehoboth and surrounding communities

The opinion of the court was delivered by RODRÍGUEZ, A.A., J.A.D. In this appeal, we hold that in a transaction involving the sale or lease of real estate, where the proposed contract has been prepared by a real estate broker, the three-day attorney review period mandated by caselaw and regulation,1 commences to run on the day after the delivery of a fully-executed contract to th

160 F.Supp.2d 468 (2001) Asadour MANAVAZIAN, Terry Giese, Richard Houchin, Steven Leodis, Anita Loeb, Dr. Cayetano Lopez-Cepero, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ATEC GROUP, INC., Surinder Rametra, Ashok Rametra, Defendants. No. 99 CV 4993(FB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 23, 2001.

MAJORITY OPINION JEFFREY V. BROWN, Justice. In this property-foreclosure case, Victor Rodarte appeals the trial court’s summary-judgment orders in favor of Investeco Group, L.L.C., Morad Mekhail, and Vincent Rodriguez. Victor contends that the summary-judgment orders were improperly granted because (1) he had standing to prosecute the suit on his brother’s behalf; (2) one summary-judgment order was based sol

OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. This case — involving tens of thousands of dollars in statutory damages, half a jury trial, and cross-appeals — stems from a debt collector’s pursuit of $25 in unpaid medical bills. John Daubert won summary judgment on his Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) claim against NRA Group, LLC but he lost at tria