Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “v. CURRENCY”
Wertheim, LLC v. Currency Corporationpublic domain
Filed 11/12/21 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE WERTHEIM, LLC, B304655 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC328263) v. CURRENCY CORPORATION, Defendant and Appella
Wertheim, LLC v. Currency Corp.public domain
Filed 10/14/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE WERTHEIM, LLC, B304655 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC328263) v. CURRENCY CORPORATION, Defendant and Appellant. ___________________________________ WERTHEIM, LLC,
Wertheim, LLC v. Currency Corp.public domain
CHANEY, Acting P. J. *1127After Wertheim LLC obtained a money judgment against Currency Corporation, Currency obtained a bond to secure the judgment and appealed. We affirmed the judgment and issued a remittitur in July 2012. Wertheim sought to satisfy the judgment from the appeal bond but Currency blocked disbursement. After the issuer depo
Wertheim, LLC v. Currency Corporationpublic domain
Filed 6/6/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE WERTHEIM, LLC, B277633 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC328263) v. CURRENCY CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los
United States v. Currency $11,331public domain
482 F.Supp.2d 873 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. CURRENCY $11,331, Defendant, Robert Shannon, Claimant. No. 05-73793. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. March 27, 2007. *874 *875 *876 Tauras N. Ziedas, United
MEMORANDUM * Defendant Craig A. Cunningham appeals from a decision of the district court, ordering him to disgorge more than $4.3 million on account of securities fraud perpetrated through a company called Currency Trading International, Inc. (“CTI”). Defendant argues that his 1998 settlement agreement with the Department of Justice bars the Security and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) later disgorgement claim
United States v. Currency U.S. $38,167.00public domain
MEMORANDUM ** In this civil forfeiture proceeding, Christopher Isley appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence and the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the government. We reverse. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we will not recount it here in detail. The district court issued its decis
MEMORANDUM * Defendant Craig A. Cunningham appeals from a decision of the district court, ordering him to disgorge more than $4.3 million on account of securities fraud perpetrated through a company called Currency Trading International, Inc. (“CTI”). Defendant argues that his 1998 settlement agreement with the Department of Justice bars the Security and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) later disgorgement claim
Smith v. Currency Trading International, Inc.public domain
10 F.Supp.2d 1189 (1998) Frank M. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CURRENCY TRADING INTERNATIONAL, INC., Marie Fine and John Doe, Defendants. No. CIV. A. 98-B-577. United States District Court, D. Colorado. July 17, 1998. Francis V. Cristiano, Richard A. Nervig, Cristiano & Nervig, Denver, CO, for Plaintiff. David A. Zisser, Berliner, Zisser, Walter & Gallegos, P
United States v. Currency in the Amount Ofpublic domain
304 F.3d 165 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,v.U.S. CURRENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $119,984.00, MORE OR LESS, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,Cesar Castro and Maria Ansueto, Claimants. No. 01-6077. No. 01-6193. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: April 25, 2002. Decid
United States v. Currencypublic domain
16 F.3d 344 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.$20,193.39 U.S. CURRENCY; 14K Yellow Gold Rings 83Un-Mounted 99.6 DWT; Numerous Other Pieces ofGold Jewelry & Precious Stones, Defendants,andZareh Berberian, Claimant-Appellant. No. 92-56000. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 1, 1994.
Internat. Currency Technologies v. ICT, Inc.public domain
Filed 6/27/25 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff and Respondent, A170714 v. (Alameda County ICT, INC., Super. Ct. No. RG16828743) Defendant and Appellant.
People v. $33,260 United States Currencypublic domain
2024 IL App (4th) 231465 FILED October 25, 2024 NO. 4-23-1465 Carla Bender 4th District Appellate IN THE APPELLATE COURT Court, IL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : : v. : Civil Action No.: 20-2227 (RC) : : Re Document Nos.: 76, 85, 87
United States v. Currency, $5,100.00public domain
956 F.2d 265 U.S.v.Currency, $5,100.00* NO. 91-3150 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Feb 14, 1992 1 Appeal From: E.D.La. 2
United States v. 113 Virtual Currency Accountspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-606 (TJK) 113 VIRTUAL CURRENCY ACCOUNTS et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The United States seeks the forfeiture of 145 virtual currency accounts containing funds linked to al
Opinion by Judge TROTT; Concurrence by Judge TROTT. TROTT, Circuit Judge. Ruby Diane Hysell (“Hysell”) appeals the district court’s grant of forfeiture in favor of the United States on summary judgment. Hysell contends the government lacked probable cause to seek the forfeiture of $42,500 and thus, that she is entitled to go to trial in order to prove that the currency was not entangled with illegal drug
People v. $940 United States Currencypublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : Civil Action No.: 20-2227 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 54, 62, 68 : : F
United States v. 155 Virtual Currency Assetspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 20-cv-2228 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 10