Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Zurich American Insurance Company v. XL Insurance America, Inc.”
Friedlander, Senior Judge. [1] In 2009, Schindler Elevator Corporation had a contract with Circle Centre Mall, LLC and Simon Property Group, Inc. (collectively, "the Simon Plaintiffs") to maintain the escalators at the Circle Centre Mall in Indianapolis. KONE, Inc. had the maintenance contract before 2009. Schindler's general liability insurer in 2009 was Zurich American Insurance Compa
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00127-SCT ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS US INSURANCE COMPANY, AXIS SPECIALTY EUROPE S.E., ENDURANCE WORLDWIDE INSURANCE LIMITED, HELVETIA SWISS INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY, MS AMLIN CORPORATE MEMBER LIMITED, NAVIGATORS MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., PARTNER RE IRELAND INSURANCE DAC, SWISS RE INTERNATIONAL S.E., LUXEMBOURG, ZURICH BRANCH, XL INSURANCE AMERICA, INC., ZURI
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED Fall 2025 Term November 13, 2025 _____________________ released at 3:00 p.m. ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NORTHROP GRUMMAN ) INNOVATION SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE ) COMPANY, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS ) AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, ) C.A. No. N18C-09-210 CONTINETAL CA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NORTHROP GRUMMAN ) INNOVATION SYSTEMS, INC., ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE ) COMPANY, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS ) AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, ) C.A. No. N18C-09-210 CONTINETAL CASUALTY INSURANCE )
FiLED IN 5TH COURT OF APPEALS I5 fPR 2g PH g: gO CAUSE NO. QS-14-O151O-CV LISA &‘STZ. CIR< IN THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS TRENTS. GRIFFIN Appellant, V. AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY Appellee. On appeal from the
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2022 VT 45
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT/ ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE/ CROSS-APPELLEE: CROSS-APPELLANT CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY f/k/a GEORGE M. PLEWS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FREDERICK D. EMHARDT NORTH AMERICA: KATHERINE E. WINDERS JOSH S. TATUM DALE W. EIKENBERRY SEAN M. HIRSCHTEN Wooden & McLaughlin LLP
Mazzarelli, J.R, (dissenting). Plaintiff Extell West 57th Street is the owner of real property located at 157 West 57th Street in Manhattan. Extell undertook the construction of a 74-floor mixed-use hotel and residential building, known as the One57 building. Plaintiff Lend Lease (US) Construction LMB Inc. served as Extell’s construction manager for the project. Lend Lease subcontracted with nonparty Pinnacle Industries II, LLC (Pi
Technicolor v. Insurance Company of North Americapublic domain
FILED Aug 22 2023, 8:52 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RITE AID CORPORATION; RITE AID ) HDQTRS. CORP.; and RITE AID OF ) MARYLAND, INC. d/b/a MID-ATLANTIC ) CUSTOMER SUPPORT CENTER, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No. N19C-04-150 EMD CCLD ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY; ) JURY TRIAL ILLINOI
FILED Jul 14 2025, 9:45 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PANGEA EQUITY PARTNERS, LP, ) PANGEA EQUITY PARTNERS II, ) LP, PANGEA VENTURES, LLC, ) C.A. No. N23C-12-060 MAA CCLD PANGEA REAL ESTATE ) HOLDINGS, LLC, and PANGEA ) PROPERTIES, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-6240-10T1 IMO INDUSTRIES INC., APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, September 30, 2014 v. A
Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co.public domain
784 N.W.2d 341 (2010) CARGILL, INCORPORATED, et al., Appellants, v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Respondents, Affiliated FM Insurance Company, et al., Respondents, Allianz Underwriters Insurance Company, et al., Respondents, Allied World Assurance, et al., Defendants, American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company, et al., Respondents, American Home Assurance Company, et al., Respondents, American Employers'
Donald Bouvet v. Illinois Union Insurance Companypublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1139 Doc: 43 Filed: 03/04/2026 Pg: 1 of 14 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1139 In re: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. ------------------------------ DONAL
HCA, Inc. v. American Protection Insurance Co.public domain
OPINION WILLIAM B. CAIN, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which FRANK G. CLEMENT, JR., J., joined. WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., P.J., M.S., filed a concurring opinion. HCA, Inc. appeals the action of the trial court in granting summary judgment to the insurer/ defendants based upon an “inventory exclusion” provision in the policies of insurance. We reverse the
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 57 The Burlington Insurance Company, Appellant, v. NYC Transit Authority, et al., Respondents. Joseph D'Ambrosio, for appellant. Charles R. Strugatz, for respondents. Turner Construction Company, amicus curiae. RIVERA, J.: We conclude that where an i
OPINION WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals arise from two separate actions that involve California Shock Trauma Air Rescue (CALSTAR). Both actions turn on the same jurisdictional question: is the expectation of a federal defense, without more, sufficient to establish federal jurisdiction over a state-law claim? Despite CALSTAR’s arguments to the contrary, we reiterate that the well-
71,ED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE JAN 26 2018 AT NASHVILLE Clerk of the Appellate Courts September 6, 2017 Session. Recd By OPRY MILLS MALL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,ET AL. v. ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY,ET AL.