Cases

ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, United States District Judge THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant, Southern-Owners Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss Zurich American Insurance Company’s Second Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Cause of Action (Doc. 49; Motion), filed on September 1, 2016. Plaintiff, Zurich American Insurance Company (Plaintiff or ZAIC), filed a response on September 15, 2

MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, United States District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on (1) Plaintiff, Zurich American Insurance Company's Motion for Final Summary Judgment (Doc. 88; ZAIC's Motion), filed on October 6, 2017; and (2) Defendant, Southern-Owners Insurance Company's Motion for Final Summary Judgment (Doc. 94; SOIC's Motion), filed on November 20, 2017. On October 20, 2017, Defendant Southern-Owners Insur

ACCEPTED 01-15-00478-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/18

LIONEL JONES AND WILLIE * NO. 2018-CA-0552 WILSON * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * MARYLAND CASUALTY FOURTH CIRCUIT COMPANY, ZURICH * AMERICAN INSURANCE STATE OF LOUISIANA COMPANY, POWELL'S ******* CABLE COMPANY AND KAREN A. JONES CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOLIDATED WITH: COURTNEY GILLARD

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON SHELLEY S. HAWKINS, individually and as assignee of Edwin G. Miguel, No. 85400-3-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. PUBLISHED OPINION ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurer, Appellant, EDWIN G. MIGUEL; FATEMAH S. ALSUWAIDAN; and DOES AND DOE INSURANCE COMPANIES 1-5, Defendants. BIRK, J. — Followin

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT „• BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before, the Court upon Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Zurich American Insurance Company (“Zurich”), ECF No. [27], and Defendant National Specialty ■ Insurance Company (“National”), ECF No. [19], (collectively, the “Motions”). The Court has carefully reviewed the Motions, the record, all supp

Filed 5/5/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO POONAM DUA, B314780 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC723434) v. STILLWATER INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from orders of the Superior Cou

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-1186 SANDY POINT DENTAL, P.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court f

20-3559-cv The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Equitas Insurance Limited UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2022 Argued: December 1, 2022 Decided: May 22, 2023 Docket No. 20-3559-cv THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA,

FIRST DIVISION BARNES, P. J., GOBEIL and PIPKIN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules

OPINION AND ORDER LOUIS L. STANTON, District Judge. Plaintiff cement manufacturers seek declaratory relief and damages from defendant insurers’ refusal to defend them against two antitrust suits prosecuted in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, which alleged that plaintiffs fixed prices, allocated customers, restricted supply, and concealed their conspiracy in violation of the Sherm

*383MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER IRENE C. BERGER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Court has reviewed the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 41) and Memorandum of Law in Support (Document 42), the Defendant’s Suggestion of Unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 44), and the Response of Plaintiff t

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1336 STANT USA CORP., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FACTORY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Case: 16-20195 Document: 00514621050 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-20195 FILED August 29, 2018

SAWAYA, J., concurring in part; dissenting in part. I agree with the majority that the summary judgment rendered in favor of the Appellees in the declaratory judgment action should be reversed. But the majority remands the case to the trial court, apparently for the purpose of allowing the parties to establish whether Daisy Eastwood (the alleged tortfeasor and additional indiv

FILED Jul 14 2025, 9:45 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

Case: 16-20195 Document: 00514270240 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/12/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-20195 FILED D

498 F.Supp.2d 1019 (2007) COMERICA INC., Plaintiff, v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. and Houston Casualty Co., Defendants. No. 06-10353. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 27, 2007. *1020 Robert G. Brower, Bodman, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff. Steven M. Wolock, Maddin, Hauser, Southfield, MI

Justice JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court. This case comes to us from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on certified questions. The controversy centers on the contractual liability exclusion in a Commercial General Liability (CGL) insurance policy. The certified questions are: 1. Does a general contractor that enters i

RANDOLPH, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. The Marshall County Circuit Court entered an order dismissing Adlai Johnson from the suit for Plaintiffs' failure to timely serve him. 1 Church Mutual Insurance Company ("Church Mutual") then moved to have the trial court declare that Tennessee substantive law c