⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

3 opinions for “Zogenix, Inc. v. Patrick”

District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015-01-05 · Published · cited 5× · 77 F. Supp. 3d 237; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 378; 2015 WL 57862
■MEMORANDUM YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this emergency action, Care-markPCS, L.L.C. and CVS Caremark Corporation (collectively, “Defendants” or “CVS Caremark”), moved to compel the plaintiff, Hopkinton Drug, Inc. (“Hopkin-ton”) to submit to arbitration most of the claims asserted in its complaint, and to stay any remaining claims. Hopkinton, in reply, argued th
District Court, N.D. California · 2019-03-07 · Published · cited 1× · 364 F. Supp. 3d 1085
Honorable Vince Chhabria, United States District Judge Beyond its motion for summary judgment on causation, Monsanto moved for summary judgment against the three bellwether plaintiffs on four other grounds. Specifically, Monsanto contended that: (i) the plaintiffs' claims are expressly preempted by federal law; (ii) the plaintiffs' claims are impliedly preempted; (iii) the evidence is insufficient to support a jury verdict for the p
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2025-08-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE: CVS OPIOID § INSURANCE LITIGATION § No. 482, 2024 § § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. N22C-02-045 Submitted: June 25, 2025