⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Zhu v. Wolf”

Nora v. Wolfpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-06-25 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) NORA AND HER MINOR ) SON, JOSE (by and through ) his mother) c/o American ) Civil Liberties Union, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, )
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-05-27 · Published · cited 0× · 23 F. Supp. 3d 234; 2014 WL 2465284
DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. By Indictment dated October 10, 2013, a grand jury charged defendant Yudong Zhu (“Zhu”) with conspiring to commit honest services fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, 18 U.S.C. § 1346, and 18 U.S.C. § 1349; conspiring to receive bribes in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 371; commercial bribery conspiracy in viola
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020-06-23 · Published · cited 106× · 962 F.3d 612
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 6, 2020 Decided June 23, 2020 No. 19-5298 MAKE THE ROAD NEW YORK, ET AL., APPELLEES v. CHAD F. WOLF, ACTING SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, ET AL., APPELLANTS Appeal from the United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-05-24 · Published · cited 2× · 857 F.3d 994; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 9029; 2017 WL 2261024
OPINION W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs bring a would-be class action alleging that China Agritech, Inc. (“China Agritech”) and its managers and directors violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Plaintiffs were unnamed plaintiffs in two earlier would-be class actions against many of the same defendants based on the same unde
Hughes v. Hupublic domain
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020-04-27 · Published · cited 0×
EFiled: Apr 27 2020 09:00AM EDT Transaction ID 65600595 Case No. 2019-0112-JTL IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WILLIAM HUGHES, JR., Derivatively ) on Behalf of Nominal Defendant KANDI ) TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, )
District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018-08-13 · Published · cited 0× · 319 F. Supp. 3d 990
Jeffrey Cole, United States Magistrate Judge *991Judge Norgle has referred to me what Motorola has rather fancifully (and erroneously) titled its "Motion to Confirm Joint Discovery Plan." (Emphasis supplied). [Dkt. ## 269, 274]. The word "fancifully" is used advisedly, because there is no joint discovery plan, which is perhaps not surprising given the
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021-07-20 · Published · cited 22× · 5 F.4th 59
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 6, 2021 Decided July 20, 2021 No. 20-5235 ITECH U.S., INC, APPELLANT v. TRACY RENAUD, ACTING DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distr
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-06-15 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SRINIVASA SAI TEZA MUKKAVILLI, Plaintiff, Case No. 22-cv-2289 (TNM) v. UR M. JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Indian national Srinivasa
California Court of Appeal · 2018-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 6/18/2018 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE JAKE NEWLAND, B277638 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC514945) v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and order of the Supe
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014-02-10 · Published · cited 5× · 998 F. Supp. 2d 646; 2014 WL 689703
OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge. Mohammad S. Galaria and Anthony Hancox (“Named Plaintiffs”) are the named plaintiffs in these related putative class action lawsuits. Named Plaintiffs sue Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Defendant”), alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), negligence, invasion of privacy, and bailment. Defendant moves to dismiss b
Leal v. Meekspublic domain
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2015-05-14 · Published · cited 174× · 115 A.3d 1173
STRINE, Chief Justice: I. INTRODUCTION These appeals were scheduled for argument on the same day because they turn on a single legal question: in an action for damages against corporate fiduciaries, where the plaintiff challenges an interested transaction that is presumptively subject to entire fairness review, must the plaintiff plead a non-exculpated claim against the disinterested, independent direc
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020-07-17 · Published · cited 56× · 965 F.3d 883
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 9, 2019 Decided July 17, 2020 No. 19-5013 GRACE, ET AL., APPELLEES v. WILLIAM P. BARR, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, ET AL., APPELLANTS Appeal from the United States District Court
District Court, District of Columbia · 2026-03-19 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALI AGHAKASIRI, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24 - 2898 (LLA) PAMELA J. BONDI, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Ali Aghakasiri, an Iranian citizen residing in Iran, seeks to compel Defendants— U.S. At
District Court, District of Columbia · 2026-06-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FERNANDO PEREZ CORREA CAMARENA, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 26-730 (JDB) v. MARKWAYNE MULLIN et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Fernando Correa is a Mexican national who has invested $800,000 in a regional center in a high unemployment area in the
District Court, D. Kansas · 2009-09-22 · Published · cited 3× · 659 F. Supp. 2d 1167; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86888; 2009 WL 3045464
659 F.Supp.2d 1167 (2009) The PARADIGM ALLIANCE, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. CELERITAS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, and Celeritasworks, LLC Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. Ken Wilkerson, Third Party Defendant. Case No. 07-1121-EFM. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 22, 2009. *1172 Brian P. Baggo
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-12-05 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA YAMIL LUNA GUTIERREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25 - 1766 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan KRISTI NOEM, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The United States Naval Stat
Lesly Miot v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2026-02-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRITZ EMMANUEL LESLY MIOT, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 25-cv-02471 (ACR) v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On December 2, 1783, then-Commander-in-Chief George Washington penned: “America is open to receive not only the Opule
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-06-26 · Published · cited 14× · 30 F. Supp. 3d 230; 2014 WL 2915880
CORRECTED OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: An accounting firm’s worst nightmare might be to wake up one morning and discover that the company that one of its teams had audited for the past several years had in fact disappeared, and that what the team had been auditing had been merely a mirage. A twist that could serve only to heighten this distress might be the discovery t
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2015-05-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE § No. 564, 2014 IN RE CORNERSTONE § THERAPUTICS INC, § Court Below: STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION § Court of Chancery of the State § of Delaware § § C.A. No. 8922-VCG _______________________________________________________________
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2015-05-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE § No. 564, 2014 IN RE CORNERSTONE § THERAPUTICS INC, § Court Below: STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION § Court of Chancery of the State § of Delaware § § C.A. No. 8922-VCG _______________________________________________________________