Cases

Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendants' motion to compel arbitration or in the alternative, to dismiss Plaintiff's claims. I. Background Plaintiff was an employee of Defendant UnitedHealth Group ("UnitedHealth") from December 2014 through November 14, 2016. (Amended Complaint ¶¶ 3, 11.) In 2016, he was a senior developer and repo

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Rong Xun Zhang, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of the May 26, 2005 order of the BIA affirming the October 28, 2003 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Roxanne C. Hladylowycz, denying petitioner’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Rong Xun Zhang, No. A79 787 594 (B.I.A. May 26, 2005), aff'g No

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Hou Sheng Zhang, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a July 2, 2004 order of the BIA affirming the April 11, 2003 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) George T. Chew denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Hou Shen Zhang, No. A78 840 630 (B.I.A. July 2, 2004), aff'g No. A78 840

SUMMARY ORDER At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 15th day of May, Two thousand and six. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is is GRANTED; the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals is VACATED; and the case is REMANDED. Petitioner Shao Lan Zhang, pro se, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China (“China”), petitions this Court for review of a December 17, 2003 order of the Board of Immigration Appeal

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) be and it hereby is DENIED. Petitioner Shan Chai Zhang, through counsel, petitions for review of the June 8, 2004 BIA decision affirming the decision of the immigration judge (“IJ”) denying asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Con

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dorsa, J.), dated June 30, 2008, as denied their motion for the dissolution of the plaintiff, and granted that branch of the plaintiffs cross *1166motion which was for leave to enter judgment against them on the is

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eatzes, J.), dated April 8, 2009, as granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was to enforce a written settlement agreement dated October 29, 2008, and denied that branch of their cross motion which was to vacate the settlement agreement. O

SACK, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Zhang Jian Xie, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, entered the United States unlawfully in October 1992. In October 1993, Xie applied to the Immigration and Naturalization Service of the Department of Justice for asylum and withholding of removal. Before coming to this country, Xie had worked for more than a year

E-FILED CNMI SUPREME COURT E-filed: Sep 29 2023 05:19PM Clerk Review: Sep 29 2023 05:19PM Filing ID: 70985183 Case No.: 2022-SCC-0004-CRM

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-24-00145-CV __________________ HUIQIN JIAO, Appellant V. YUNPENG ZHANG, Appellee _____________________________________________________

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the order of the *331Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the petition is DENIED. Petitioner Qing Xiang Zhang, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of a January 13, 2003 decision of the BIA that summarily affirmed t

#28524-rev in pt & aff in pt-MES 2019 S.D. 46 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** ZHI GANG ZHANG, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DAN RASMUS, AN INDIVIDUAL, RASMUS LAW OFFICE, LLC; TIM JAMES, AN INDIVIDUAL, JAMES LAW, PC; WILLIAM R. SKOLNICK, AN INDIVIDUAL, AMY D. JOYCE, AN INDIVIDUAL, SKOLNICK & SHIFF, P.A.,

*82OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. Xin Wen Zhang seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the denial of his request for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction to review the petition pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) and will deny the

Xiaoyong Zhang v Jong (2021 NY Slip Op 03432) Xiaoyong Zhang v Jong 2021 NY Slip Op 03432 Decided on June 01, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judici

980 F.Supp. 787 (1997) Sujing ZHANG, v. SOUTHEASTERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., Andrew J. McClure, Esq., Haven-Scott Associates, Inc., James G. Johnson, PNC Bank, N.A., Judith Lupinski, a/k/a Judy Lupinski, William E. Donnelly, Prothonotary of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Penna, and Frank P. Lalley, Sheriff of Montgomery County, Penna. No. CIV. A. 95-2126. United States District Court, E

SUMMARY ORDER Jian Cong Zhang, a citizen of China, appeals from the BIA’s order dismissing his appeal from Immigration Judge (“LJ”) Alan Vomacka’s order denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case. When the BIA does not adopt the decision of t

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Honorable Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge Plaintiff Jay Marshall Strabala brought this action against Defendants Qiao Zhang and Zhou Shimiao (referred to collectively as “Defendants” and individually as “Zhang” and “Zhou”)1 alleging defamation and intentional interference with his business. The parties are former partners in an archi

Decision Denying the Debtor’s Chapter 7 Discharge Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 727(a)(2)(A) and (B) and 727(a)(4) GUY R. HUMPHREY, Bankruptcy Judge. The issue in this adversary proceeding is whether the debtor should be denied a *71discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 727(a)(2)(A) and (B), 727(a)(3), 727(a)(4)(A) and 727(a)(5). For the reasons set forth b

SALTER, Justice [¶1.] Dr. Zhi Gang Zhang, proceeding pro se, commenced this legal malpractice action against his former attorneys who were, themselves, engaged to prosecute a legal malpractice claim against Zhang's former divorce attorney. The circuit court granted one attorney's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and granted summary judgment in favor of all the former attorneys. Zhang appeals, arguing the circuit