Cases

VAN NORTWICK, Judge. Nancy S. Barr appeals a final judgment which domesticated a North Carolina final judgment of dissolution and modified such judgment to increase the amount of child support and alimony. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in increasing the alimony and child support only prospectively and in setting the amount by which the alimony was increased. We find no abuse of discretion as to the amount of

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 2, 2009 TONY YOUNG v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. P-19507; P-21814; P-21815; P-21816 John P. Colton, Jr., Judge No. W2007-00328-CCA-R3-PC - Filed December 28, 2009 The Petitioner, Tony Young, appeals the denial of post-conviction

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2665 MARCOS F. SANTIAGO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.C. STREEVAL, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the North

492 So.2d 705 (1986) Jo Ann SANDERS, Appellant, v. Dorsey A. SANDERS, Jr., Appellee. No. BF-390. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. July 15, 1986. Rehearing Denied September 10, 1986. *706 Daniel T. O'Connell, of O'Connell & Hulslander, Gainesville, for appellant. Zelda J. Hawk, of Si

Lee Boyd Malvo v. State of Maryland No. 29, September Term, 2021. Criminal Procedure – Constitutional Law – Sentencing of Juvenile Offender – Homicide. Recent Supreme Court decisions have held that the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution does not permit a sentence of life without parole for a juvenile offender convicted of homicide if the sentencing court determines that the offender’s crime was the result of transient immaturity, as opposed to permanent incorrigibility. That c

Lee Boyd Malvo v. State of Maryland No. 29, September Term, 2021. Criminal Procedure – Constitutional Law – Sentencing of Juvenile Offender – Homicide. Recent Supreme Court decisions have held that the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution does not permit a sentence of life without parole for a juvenile offender convicted of homicide if the sentencing court determines that the offender’s crime was the result of transient immaturity, as opposed to permanent incorrigibility. That c

706 So.2d 213 (1998) Wayne and Barbara O'RILEY, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF SHREVEPORT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 30107-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. January 23, 1998. Rehearing Denied February 17, 1998. *215 Zelda W. Tucker, Assistant City Attorney, Shreveport, for Defendant-Appellant.

Lee Boyd Malvo v. State of Maryland No. 29, September Term, 2021. Criminal Procedure – Constitutional Law – Sentencing of Juvenile Offender – Homicide. Recent Supreme Court decisions have held that the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution does not permit a sentence of life without parole for a juvenile offender convicted of homicide if the sentencing court determines that the offender’s crime was the result of transient immaturity, as opposed to permanent incorrigibility. That c

371 F.Supp.2d 305 (2004) Thearthur GRIMES, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent. No. 02-CV-6202. United States District Court, W.D. New York. July 9, 2004. *306 *307 Thearther Grimes, Attica, NY, pro se. Loretta S. C

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: This case returns to us upon reinstatement by the ere banc Court, Soffar v. Cockrell, 300 F.3d 588 (5th Cir.2002) (“Soffar II”), of the original panel’s grant of a Certificate of Appealability (“COA”), Soffar v. Johnson, 237 F.3d 411 (5th Cir.2000) (“Soffar I”), as to Petitioner Max Alexander Soffar’s claims that (1) he did not have effective assistance of c

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D REVISED JUNE 16, 2004 April 21, 2004 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit Charles

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS AP-75,363 MAX ALEXANDER SOFFAR, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. 319724 IN THE 232ND DISTRICT COURT HARRIS COUNTY Per curiam. P RICE, J., concurred on point of error four and

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

94 Cal.Rptr.2d 840 (2000) 22 Cal.4th 809 996 P.2d 1152 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Terry Douglas BEMORE, Defendant and Appellant. No. S012762. Supreme Court of California. April 20, 2000. Rehearing Denied June 21, 2000. *844 Matthew G. Newman, Parker, A

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Max Alexander Soffar, convicted of capital murder 1 and sentenced to death by a Texas state court seeks a certificate of probable cause (“CPC”) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his first federal application for writ of habeas corpus, which he filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 225

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 98-20385 MAX ALEXANDER SOFFAR, Petitioner-Appellant, VERSUS GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, R

112 Cal.App.2d 482 (1952) THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ANTHONY T. CARVALHO, Appellant. Crim. No. 4806. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. One. July 31, 1952. Wilbur W. McCray for Appellant. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, and Stanford D. Herlick, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. WHITE, P. J. In an information filed b