Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Zandra A. Jones”
Jones v. U.S. Child Support Recoverypublic domain
961 F.Supp. 1518 (1997) Kathleen Francis JONES, f/k/a Kathleen Francis Fritch, Plaintiff, v. U.S. CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY, a Texas Corporation, and Zandra L. Perkins, Defendants. Civil No. 2:94-CV-0124 B. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. March 27, 1997. *1519 R. Steven Chambers, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plai
Garcia-Aguilar v. United States District Courtpublic domain
535 F.3d 1021 (2008) Guillermo GARCIA-AGUILAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR The SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, United States of America, Real Party in Interest. In re Erick Manjarrez-Cervantez, Petitioner, Erick Manjarrez-Cervantez, Petitioner, v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Respondent, United States of America, Real Party in Interest. In re Fre
South Carolina Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Quality HR Services, Inc.public domain
FEW, C.J. The workers’ compensation commission issued an order determining whether the South Carolina Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association or the South Carolina Uninsured Employers’ Fund was liable to pay benefits in ten consolidated workers’ compensation cases. However, the commission never determined whether any of the ten claimants are entitled to benefits. We find the commission’s order was not a final deci
Manion v. Ameri-Can Freight Sys. Inc.public domain
Dominic W. Lanza, United States District Judge *890This case arises from a March 12, 2016 traffic accident that resulted in the instantaneous death of Johnathan Blyler ("the Decedent"). The vehicle that struck the Decedent's vehicle was a tractor-trailer being driven by Steven Robertson, an employee of Ameri-Can Freight Systems, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants"). The pl
United States v. Santanapublic domain
526 F.3d 1257 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Engelberto SANTANA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-50190. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 4, 2008. Filed May 27, 2008. *1258 Zandra L. Lopez, Federal Defenders of San Diego, CA, for the defendant-appellant
Benjamin v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Americapublic domain
793 F.Supp. 729 (1992) Joe and Viola BENJAMIN, Individually and as Representatives of the Estate of Otis Ray Benjamin, Plaintiffs, v. NATURAL GAS PIPELINE COMPANY OF AMERICA and Brown & Root, Inc., Defendants. Civ. A. No. G-92-118. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. June 30, 1992. *730 Zandra Anders
State v. Washingtonpublic domain
JiMARVIN, Chief Judge. Appealing her conviction in a judge-trial for issuing a worthless check and her sentence to six years at hard labor,- Zandra Washington questions the sufficiency of the evidence to convict and contends that the sentence is unconstitutionally excessive. We affirm the conviction, vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. FACTS Shoppi
Umaña v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER Robert J. Conrad, Jr., United States District Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Petitioner Alejandro Enrique Ramirez Umaña’s unopposed motion to place the above-captioned action in abeyance. (Doc. No. 45). I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY On April 19, 2010, a jury convicted Uma-ña of four capital offenses: two counts of murder in aid of racketeering, 18
United States v. Alejandro Umanapublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ALEJANDRO ENRIQUE RAMIREZ UMAÑA, a/k/a Wizard, a/k/a Lobo, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judg
United States v. Mississippipublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TOM S. LEE, District Judge. On July 9, 1970, the United States initiated this action by bringing suit, pursuant to section 407 of Title IY of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000c-6, against the State of Mississippi, alleging the unlawful operation of a racially dual system of public education in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Garcia-Aguilar v. Usdc-Caspublic domain
Corrected Reprint 8/8/08 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GUILLERMO GARCIA-AGUILAR, Petitioner, v. No. 07-70293 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN D.C. No. CR-06-00678-LAB DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Calderon v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.public domain
ORDER EDWARD J. LODGE, District Judge. Before the Court in the above-entitled matter is Defendant’s Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Order partially granting Plaintiffs Second Motion to Compel Discovery. (Dkt. 54.) The Order requires Defendant to make certain individuals available for deposition in a mutually agreed-upon location in Chile via notice, without issuing subpoenas through the Chilean letters
United States v. State of Miss.public domain
622 F.Supp. 622 (1985) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Zandra Pittman, minor child, by her parents and next friends, Andrew and Patricia Pittman; Geneva Harrell and Jimmy Harrell, Jr., minor children, by their parents and next friends, Jimmie and Rose Mary Harrell, et al., Plaintiffs-Intervenors, v. The STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, et al., Defendants, and Hattiesburg Municipal Separate School District, Defendant-Intervenors.
State v. Byrdpublic domain
510 S.E.2d 410 (1999) STATE of North Carolina v. Bobby Leshan BYRD. No. COA98-387. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 2, 1999. *411 Attorney General Michael F. Easley, by Assistant Attorney General Elizabeth N. Strickland, for the State. Paul Pooley, Durham, for defendant-appellant. GREENE, Judge. B
808 F.2d 385 36 Ed. Law Rep. 1117 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Zandra PITTMAN, Minor Child By Her Parents and Next Friends,Andrew and Patricia PITTMAN; Geneva Harrell and JimmyHarrell, Jr., Minor Children By Their Parents and NextFriends, Jimmie and Rose Mary Harrell, et al.,Plaintiffs-Intervenors, Appellants,v.The STATE of Mississippi, et al., Defendants-Appellees,
United States v. Woodardpublic domain
531 F.3d 1352 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Dvaughn WOODARD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-16577. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. June 27, 2008. *1354 Bruce S. Harvey, Stuart M. Mones, Stuart M. Mones, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Woodard. Paul Rhinehart Jones, Amy Levin Weil, U.S.
United States v. Santanapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 07-50190 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No. CR-03-01017-NAJ-1 ENGELBERTO SANTANA, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal fro
Alvarado v. Colvinpublic domain
ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 2015, upon consideration of the plaintiffs request for review, the Commissioner’s response, and the plaintiffs reply, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED
State v. Washingtonpublic domain
700 So.2d 1068 (1997) STATE of Louisiana, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Zandra H. WASHINGTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 29784-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. September 26, 1997. Rehearing Denied October 23, 1997. *1071 George Britton, III, for Defendant-Appellant. Richard Ieyoub, Attorney General
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
SACK, Circuit Judge: In this litigation, judgment creditors of the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) attempt to execute on $1.68 billion in bond proceeds allegedly owned by Iran’s central bank. The Supreme Court has instructed that in an execution proceeding concerning a foreign sovereign’s assets, any defense predicated on foreign sovereign immunity must rise or fall on the text of the Foreign Sovereign