Cases

No. 118,688 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS ZACHARY SHORT, Appellant, v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS, INC., Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Whether a written instrument is ambiguous is a q

Concurrence by Judge Owens WARDLAW, Circuit Judge: *485It is no hyperbole to say that Dulce Garcia embodies the American dream. Born into poverty, Garcia and her parents shared a San Diego house with other families to save money on rent; she was even homeless for a time as a child. But she studied hard and excelled academical

ORDER ON DEFENDANT INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT RICHARD L. YOUNG, Chief Judge. Defendant, International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”), moves to dismiss the state law breach of contract claim brought by Plaintiffs, James Bowman (“Bowman”) as next friend of Jameel Bowman (“J.B.”), and Melissa Gibson (“Gibson”) as next frien

640 F.Supp.2d 1267 (2009) U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Robert LaRocca, and William Lacy, Plaintiffs, v. REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC. and Republic Silver State Disposal, Inc., Defendants. Robert LaRocca and William Lacy, Plaintiffs, v. Republic Services, a Delaware corporation, Republic Silver State Disposal, a Nevada corporation, and Does 1 through 25, Defendants. Nos. CV-S-04-1352 DAE(LRL), CV-S-04-1

493 F.Supp.2d 1103 (2007) In Re AMERICAN FUNDS SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. CV 06-7815GAF, CV 04-5593GAF, CV 07-333GAF. United States District Court, C.D. California. May 31, 2007. Adam Joshua Gutride, Seth A, Safier, Gutride Safier, San Francisco, CA, Arthur L. Shingler, III, Scott and Scott, San Diego, CA, Charles J. Piven, Marshall N. Perkins, Charles J. Piven Law Offices,

ORDER These matters are before the court on the Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc filed by appellants Alkon, Frank, Holyoak, Martin, and Schulman in number 15-3228. Upon consideration, the panel grants in part, and only to the extent of the modifications contained in the attached revised Opinion, that part of the request seeking panel rehearing. The Opinion filed on August 23, 2017, is hereby withdrawn, and s

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan May 9, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice 157589-640 & (17) Brian K. Zahra

[Cite as Moore v. SWN Prod. Co., L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-5517.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MONROE COUNTY GEORGE M. MOORE, JR. ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SWN PRODUCTION COMPANY, LLC ET AL., Defendants-Appellee

Matter of Wells Fargo Bank v Aegon USA Inv. Mgt., LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 04740) Matter of Wells Fargo Bank v Aegon USA Inv. Mgt., LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 04740 Decided on August 19, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department P

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants' Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), filed March 28, 2018 (Doc. 57)("Motion"); (ii) the Plaintiff's Motion to Strike the Declaration of Jeffrey Wu or in the Alternative Grant Plaintiff Leave to Take Discovery, filed April 23, 2018 (Doc. 61)("Motion to Strike"), an

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

*599 MEMORANDUM RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge. Currently pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Zachary W. Stassen. For the following reasons, the Motion is denied I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY1 A. General Information About Synth

Counterclaim; Fraud; False Claims Act; Special Plea in Fraud; Contract Disputes Act; Recovery Audit; NASA; Trial. OPINION HORN, J. FINDINGS OF FACT Plaintiff, Horn & Associates, Inc. (Horn & Associates), is a recovery audit firm which performed a recovery audit for the National Aeronautics and Spa

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID G. DONOVAN, Hanford No. 22-35474 Security Police Officer; CODY ALMQUIST; KORA BALES; D.C. No. DOUGLAS ANDERSON; JESS 4:21-cv-05148- BEAN; JEFF AHLERS; CYRUS TOR ANDERSON; DANIEL BEAM; TAIN BALLANTYNE; CHRISTOPHER J. HALL, Hanford OPINION Security Police Officer; JARED BETKER; DAYNNA COFFEY ARDAMICA; THOMAS R. ARDAMICA, Safety Bases Compli

Cite as 2019 Ark. 234 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE UPDATED LIST OF Opinion Delivered: June 20, 2019 ATTORNEYS SUSPENDED FOR FAILURE TO PAY 2019 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On April 25, 2019, we issued an opinion pursuant to Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar identifying attorneys who were suspended from the practice of la

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 11-577V Filed: May 24, 2019 To be Published ************************* D.G., * * Petitioner, *

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 127 Deborah Ann Stas (Petitioner) petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Securities Commission (Commission), which found that she violated Sections 201 and 401(a)-(c) of the Pennsylvania Securities Act of 1972(Act).1 The Commission: (1) barred Peti

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

APPEL, Justice (dissenting). This case is depressing. As a society, we are often uncomfortable with the subject of depression. Victims of depression are often either in deep denial or at least embarrassed because of perceptions, frequently accurate, about potential stigmatization. Even loved ones are inclined to ignore it in favor of explanations that are less stigmatizing. Rather than confront depression in a d

REISS, District Judge, dissenting: The majority holds that StudenWPlain-tiffs fail to allege standing to assert 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims because they are only indirectly affected by Defendants’ alleged Establishment Clause violations. I respectfully disagree, and would affirm in part the district court’s decision.1 The majority cabins StudenWPlaintiffs’ Establishme