Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Yvonne Michelle Perez”
Monster, Inc. v. Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corp.public domain
Order Denying Motion of Monster, Inc. for Summary Judgment And Granting Motion of Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation For Partial Summary Judgment YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge. Plaintiff Monster, Inc. (“Monster”) filed its operative amended complaint for declaratory relief September 4, 2012 (“FAC,” Dkt. No. 42) seeking a judicial declaration that the Monster Headphone Mark does not infringe
In re KBR, Inc.public domain
FLOYD, Circuit Judge: *253The Constitution entrusts the President and Congress, not the courts, with the power to resolve political questions. See Japan Whaling Ass'n v. Am. Cetacean Soc'y , 478 U.S. 221, 230, <
Gonzalez v. Padillapublic domain
OPINION YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice Appellee Oscar Padilla was struck by a *240car while riding his motorcycle in El Paso.1 The accident left Padilla with a broken leg and a “de-gloved” heel totally devoid of any skin. After being stabilized at the University Medical Center (UMC) trauma ward, Padilla was dis
700 F.Supp.2d 119 (2010) In re PETITIONERS SEEKING HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF IN RELATION TO PRIOR DETENTIONS AT GUANTANAMO BAY. Misc. No. 08-0444 (TFH). Civil Action Nos. 02-cv-1130, 04-cv-1135, 04-cv-1144, 04-cv-1194, 04-cv-1227, 04-cv-1254, 05-cv-0023, 05-cv-0345, 05-cv-0490, 05-cv-0520, 05-cv-0526, 05-cv-0584, 05-cv-0586, 05-cv-0640, 05-cv-0714, 05-cv-0723, 05-cv-0764, 05-cv-0765, 05-cv-0878, 05-cv-0833, 05-cv-0887, 05-cv-0888, 05-cv-
991 F.2d 819 301 U.S.App.D.C. 110, 76 A.F.T.R.2d 95-7649,38 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 745 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.David M. DALE, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Michelle ASHTON, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Martin SEGAL, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.AUTOMATED DATA MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellant.UNITED STATES of Ame
D.C. v. Fairfax County School Boardpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1854 Doc: 71 Filed: 03/19/2026 Pg: 1 of 28 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1854 D.C., by his parents and guardians, Trevor Chaplick and Vivian Chaplick; TREVOR CHAPLICK; VIVIAN CHAPLICK; HEAR OUR VOICES, INC., on behalf of themselves and all ot
275 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir. 2002) ELEANOR MCNAMARA-BLAD; KRISTEN ADAMS; MECHA ALLEN; AMANDA ALLGAIER; SHERRI AMES; AMBER ANDERSON; YVETTE ANKNER; RUTH ANOBA; RAMONA ARELLANO; SHAWN BAGNESHI; ELIZABETH BAILEY; CHANDRA BAKER; KIMBERLY BAKER; JEANNE BARRETT; CHRISTINA BAUER; KATIE BECKER; MISCHELLE BECKER; ANNETTE BENNETT; HELEN BENOIT; JANECE BERG; JEAN BIHLMEIER; CINDIE BLAKE; KYONG BLANCHETTE; LORI BUA; DIABOICE; KIM BOLDI; ERICA BOLLINGMO; TINA BONHOL
Cal. Medical Assn. v. Aetna Health of Cal., Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AETNA HEALTH OF CALIFORNIA INC., Defendant and Respondent. S269212 Second Appellate District, Division Eight B304217 Los Angeles County Superior Court BC487412 July 17, 2023
Aguilar v. Management & Trainingpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 4, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court _______
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2021 NY Slip Op 05388) BODY { font-family : "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size : larger; } P { line-height: 150%; text-indent: 2em } Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law 468-a
United States v. Dorlouispublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge HARVEY wrote the opinion, in which Judge MURNAGHAN and Judge WILLIAMS joined. OPINION ALEXANDER HARVEY, II, Senior District Judge: The five appellants bringing this appeal were convicted by a jury of conspiring to distribute crack cocaine and of related offenses. They here challenge their convict
Jihad Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLCpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA
Dickson v. Ruchopublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 201PA12-2 MARGARET DICKSON, ALICIA CHISOLM, ETHEL CLARK, MATTHEW A. McLEAN, MELISSA LEE ROLLIZO, C. DAVID GANTT, VALERIA TRUITT, ALICE GRAHAM UNDERHILL, ARMIN JANCIS, REBECCA JUDGE, ZETTIE WILLIAMS, TRACEY BURNS-VANN, LAWRENCE CAMPBELL, ROBINSON O. EVERETT, JR., LINDA GARROU, HAYES McNEILL, JIM SHAW, SIDNEY E. DUNSTON, ALMA ADAMS, R. STEVE BOWDEN, JASON EDWARD COLEY, KARL BERTRAND FIELDS, PAMLYN STUBBS, DON
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2022 NY Slip Op 05127) Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2022 NY Slip Op 05127 Decided on September 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published
107 F.3d 248 65 USLW 2616 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Philippe DORLOUIS, a/k/a Terrance, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jacques PAUL, a/k/a Earl Phillip, a/k/a "E", Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Marc CHARLES, a/k/a "K", a/k/a Carlo Pierre, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff
Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc.public domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1960 In re: KBR, INC., Burn Pit Litigation. ------------------------------ ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744; PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744; JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748; JOANNE OCHS, RWT 09-2747; MELISSA OCHS, RWT 09-2747; JAMES MORGAN, RWT 09-2747; DAVID NEWTON, RWT
IN RE: Administrative Suspension Pursuant to Rule 219 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcementpublic domain
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi
United States v. Dalepublic domain
Opinion PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM: The defendants, a corporation and its officers, challenge their convictions and sentences on various counts of fraud against the United States and its agencies. For the reasons set out below, we affirm *117their convictions in to to but remand for resentencing pursuant to Part X(F) of this opinion.
Akee v. Dow Chemical Co.public domain
272 F.Supp.2d 1112 (2003) Linda AKEE et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 00-CV-382BMK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. July 21, 2003. *1113 *1114 *1115 *1116
State of Texas v. United States of Americapublic domain
GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting with respect to retrogression in Congressional District 25: I, too, reaffirm our decision at summary judgment that crossover districts are protected under section 5, and I agree that enacted CD 25 is not an ability district. But I cannot join in my colleagues’ proposed test for the existence of a crossover district, which is divorced from Supreme Court precedent and dangerousl