Cases

657 So.2d 725 (1995) Yvette PERKINS v. K-MART CORPORATION. No. 94 CA 2065. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. June 23, 1995. Rehearing Denied July 25, 1995. *727 Adair D. Jones, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff/appellant-Yvette Perkins. Ian A. MacDonald, Lafayette, for defendant/appellee-K-Mart Corp.</

SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge. This appeal concerns plaintiff-appellant Yvette Cruz’s claims of race and sex discrimination against her former employer, defendant-appellee Coach Stores, Inc. (“Coach”). Cruz brought this action in 1996, claiming that Coach had violated federal, state, and city civil rights laws by, inter alia, failing to promote her and terminating

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ALLY FINANCIAL INC. ’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER ENFORCING THE CHAPTER 11 PLAN INJUNCTION MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE On November 14, 2018 — one month before the chapter 11 Plan of Residential Capital, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates was confirmed — sixty-nine plaintiffs (the “California Litigation Claimants”) filed a s

This is an appeal by appellant Ohio State Board of Pharmacy ("board") from a judgment of the common pleas court reversing an order of the appellant board finding that the language "for hospital use only" which appeared on the label of a drug known as "Nitro-Dur" did not constitute misbranding pursuant to state law. The cause originated from a citation issued by the board on March 10, 1986, to appellee Miami-Luken, Inc., for a violation of R.C. 3715.64

MEMORANDUM OPINION DAVIDSON, District Judge. This matter is before the court on a motion of the Defendant Board of Supervisors for Rule 11 sanctions or, alternatively, attorney fees and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927. The motion for sanctions and costs is directed against Plaintiff Robert E. Moore and his attorney, Willie Perkins, Sr.,1 for filing an “amended verified comp

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE EFG AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; DOUGLAS ELROY FIMRITE, a married man; MARK BOYD and GINGER BOYD, spouses; DONALD CARROLL and SONIA CARROLL, spouses, Petitioners, v. ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION; COMMISSIONERS JIM O'CONNOR, LEA MARQUEZ PETERSON, ANNA TOVAR, KEVIN THOMPSON,

ORDER JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief Judge. On September 18, 2012, Yvette Iskander sued the Department of the Navy and its Secretary, Raymond Mabus (collectively “the Navy”), alleging employment discrimination. Compl. [D.E. 1]; see also Am. Compl. [D.E. 10], On January 28, 2013, the Navy moved to dismiss Iskander’s complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim, and

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN R. TUNHEIM, United States District Judge Defendant Yvette Kouayara was indicted on one count of conspiracy to distribute certain drugs following her arrest at a cabin near Spirit Lake Casino in North Dakota in November 2014. Kouayara has filed four motions, including two asking the Court to suppress evidence. United Sta

950 N.E.2d 1251 (2011) Yvette ALBRIGHT, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. FOUR WINDS INTERNATIONAL, Appellee-Defendant. No. 93A02-1010-EX-1324. Court of Appeals of Indiana. June 13, 2011. *1252 Douglas A. Mulvaney, Elkhart, IN, Attorney for Appellant. James E. O'Gallagher, Kopka, Pinkus, Dolin & Eads, LLC, Crown Point, IN, Attor

447 F.Supp.2d 11 (2006) Yvette LOCKHART-BEMBERY, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF WAYLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 04-10581-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 11, 2006. *12 *13 Andrew M. Fischer, Jason & Fischer, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff. L

404 F.Supp.2d 373 (2005) Yvette LOCKHART-BEMBERY, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF WAYLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, Robert Irving, in his capacity as Chief of the Wayland Police Department, and Daniel Sauro, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 04-10581NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 7, 2005. *374 *37

287 B.R. 912 (2002) In re Deanna C. ORDAZ, Debtor. Deanna C. Ordaz, Plaintiff, v. Illinois Student Assistance Commission, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 01-83723, Adversary No. 01-8288. United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois. December 23, 2002. *913 James S. Brannon, Peoria, IL, for Plaintiff. David J. Hershman, Chic

752 F.Supp.2d 860 (2010) Maurice COBIGE, as Son, Next Friend, and Special Representative of the estate of Patricia Cobige, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation, et al., Defendants. Case No. 06 C 3807. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 25, 2010. *863 Douglas Kent Mor

HULL, Circuit Judge: After a jury trial, John David Stahlman appeals his conviction and 292-month sentence for attempting to entice a minor to engage in sexual activity. On appeal, Stahlman argues that the district court erred: (1) in excluding the testimony of his proposed expert, Dr. Chris Carr; (2) in admitting the case agent's lay opinion testimony and in denying Stahlman's motion f

DE ROME A. SEALS * NO. 2022-CA-0694 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL JOSEPH CORONA/DBA NOLA * AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM

TARANTO, Circuit Judge. Carnegie Mellon University (“CMU”) sued Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. and Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively “Marvell”) for infringing two patents related to hard-disk drives. A jury found for CMU on infringement and validity, and it awarded roughly $1.17 billion as a reasonable royalty for the infringing acts, using a rate of 50 cents for each of

Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana The Clerk of the Court has notified this Court that certain attorneys have failed either to pay the annual registration fee required for them to be licensed to practice law in Indiana or to file an exemption affidavit as contemplated by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2, and/or have failed to make the IOLTA certification required by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2(f). In additi

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court People v. Kirk, 2012 IL App (1st) 101606 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption WAYNE KIRK, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. First District, First Division Docket No. 1-10-1606 Filed September 24, 2012 Held

PRISCILLA R. OWEN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent because the majority opinion conflicts with the Supreme Court’s decision in O’Bannon v. Town Court Nursing Center, which held that a Medicaid beneficiary does not have a right based on 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23) to challenge the merits of a State’s assertion that a provider of Medicaid services is no longer qualified to

860 F.Supp. 546 (1994) Joselito VITUG, Plaintiff, v. MULTISTATE TAX COMMISSION; Dan R. Bucks, as Executive Director; Les Koenig, as Director of Audit; and Member Commissioners, in their capacity as Commissioners, Defendants. No. 93 C 5357. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 27, 1994. *547