Cases

671 F.Supp.2d 1006 (2009) Gregory YOUNG, Odetta Young, Edward Huyer, Connie Huyer, and Sue Ann Ross, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendants. No. 4:08-cv-507 RP-CFB. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. October 27, 2009.

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. ' Plaintiff-appellant Susan K. Young, previously before us after her action was dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Young v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Young I), 717 F.3d 224 (1st Cir. 2013), again attempts to avert the foreclosure of her home after seeking a mortgage modification under the Home Affordable

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SOROKIN, District Judge. Plaintiff Susan Young brought this suit against the trustee of the trust that holds the mortgage to her home, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, and the servicer of the mortgage, Homeward Residential.1 Be*391fore the Court is Defendants’ Motio

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. In an attempt to avert the foreclosure of her home, plaintiff Susan Young sought to modify the terms of her mortgage pursuant to the Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”), a federal initiative that ineentivizes lenders and loan servicers to offer loan modifications to eligible homeowners. When Young’s efforts did not result in a permanent loan modific

490 F.Supp.2d 756 (2007) DATATREASURY CORP., Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & CO., et al., Defendants. No. 2:06-CV-72-DF. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. April 24, 2007. *757 *758 Edward Lewis Hohn, Edward K. Chin, Nix, Patterson & Roach, LLP, Rodney Allyn Coope

ORDER FOLSOM, District Judge. Before the Court is the Motion of Defendants EDS, Harris, Key, PNC, and Suntrust to Sever and Stay the Claims Relating to the Ballard Patents Pending Reexamination of the Ballard Patents (Dkt. No. 260). Most of the remaining defendants join in this motion. Dkt. Nos. 262, *752263, 267, 271, 272, 273, 278, 281

*497OPINION2 BY: KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Much has been written about what has come to be known as the subprime mortgage crisis, including numerous newspaper accounts, scholarly articles, and popular books.3 For the undersigned, it began on April 2, 2007, with the chapter

Opinion issued December 22, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00872-CV ——————————— CALHOUN/HOLIDAY PLACE, INC., ARTISAN/AMERICAN CORP., VERNON YOUNG AND ELIZABETH YOUNG, Appellants

Opinion issued June 14, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00872-CV ——————————— CALHOUN/HOLIDAY PLACE, INC., ARTISAN/AMERICAN CORP., VERNON YOUNG AND ELIZABETH YOUNG, Appellants V.

ACCEPTED 01-14-00872-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/29/2015 12:00:00 AM

PER CURIAM Affirmed. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Peper, 278 Or App 594, 377 P3d 678 (2016); Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas v. Walmsley, 277 Or App 690, 374 P3d 937 (2016).

Order issued December 4, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00872-CV CALHOUN/HOLIDAY PLACE, INC., ARTISAN/ AMERICAN CORP., VERNON YOUNG AND ELIZABETH YOUNG, Appellants V. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR-BY-MERGER TO WACHOVIA BANK, N

Case: 24-40167 Document: 53-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 24-40167 March 10, 2025

JAMES A. PARKER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On December 12, 2017, Plaintiff Navajo Nation (Plaintiff or the Nation), a federally recognized Indian Tribe, filed suit on its own behalf and as parens patriae on behalf of the Navajo people against Defendants Wells Fargo & Company (WFC), a financial services company, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (WFBNA), a national banking association that is the primary subsidiary of

ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, U.S. DISTRICT COURT Before the Court are two motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 (Clerk’s No. 262); and (2)Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Reimbursement of Litigation Expenses, and Class Representative Service Awards (Clerk’s No. 263). A fairness hearing was held on January 21, 2016. Clerk’

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA KWANG K. SHEEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant and Respondent. S258019 Second Appellate District, Division Eight B289003 Los Angeles County Superior Court BC631510 Mar

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 23-CV-0492 & 23-CV-0669 SARAH STAAB, APPELLANT, V. WELLS FARGO BANK

2024 IL App (3d) 230020 Opinion filed November 12, 2024 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT 2024 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., )

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Brandt (2024 NY Slip Op 04223) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Brandt 2024 NY Slip Op 04223 Decided on August 14, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judi

Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge County of Cook, Illinois, alleges in this suit that Wells Fargo & Co. and related entities (collectively, "Wells Fargo") issued predatory subprime mortgage loans to Cook County residents that over the years went into default and drove the mortgaged properties into foreclosure. According to the County, because the scheme was and remains concentrated in heavily minority neighborhoods, W