Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

607 F.Supp. 67 (1985) Mitchell M. YOUNG and Wife Donna Koch Young v. Sheila S. SIMPSON, Executrix of the Estate of Buck H. Simpson, Deceased. Civ. A. No. TX-81-61-CA. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division. February 11, 1985. *68 E. Ben Franks, Lavender, Rochelle, Barnette, Franks & Arnold, Texarkana, Ar

Dalianis, J. The Laconia District Court {Huot, J.) found the defendant, Daniel Young, in violation of RSA 540-A:3,1-III (Supp. 2005), and awarded damages in the amount of $1,000 to the plaintiff, John Simpson. The plaintiff appealed the trial court’s denial of certain damages and its failure to find the defendant in contempt. We issued an opinion on December 29, 2005, affirming in part, reversing in part, and remanding. B

NORTHCUTT, Judge. Mr. and Mrs. Simpson are the maternal grandparents and legal custodians of Henry Young’s and Leslie Young’s children. They seek review of an order holding them in contempt of court for relocating the children from Florida to South Carolina and for denying the parents visitation with the children. We affirm the order in part and reverse it in part.

850 F.Supp. 648 (1994) P. Larue SIMPSON, Plaintiff, v. ERNST & YOUNG, Defendant. No. C-1-91-196. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. April 21, 1994. *649 Janet Gilligan Abaray, Stanley Morris Chesley, Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chesley, Cincinnati, OH, for Larue Simpson. Michael Samuel Glass

879 F.Supp. 802 (1994) P. LaRue SIMPSON, Plaintiff, v. ERNST & YOUNG, Defendant. No. C-1-91-196. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. September 23, 1994. *803 *804 *805 *806

MIKVA, Circuit Judge: In March 1987, Dr. Frank E. Young, the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Ad*214ministration (“FDA”), issued a final ruling certifying as safe for human consumption the color additive FD & C Blue No. 2. The Health Research Group, the Center for Science in the Public Interest, and Nancy Hendree Simpson (“petitioners”) contend that an animal stu

854 F.2d 1429 272 U.S.App.D.C. 212 Nancy Hendree SIMPSON, Public Citizen Health Research Group,and Center for Science in the Public Interest, Petitioners,v.Dr. Frank E. YOUNG, Commissioner, Food and DrugAdministration, Respondent.Certified Color Manufacturers' Association, Inc., Intervenor. No. 87-1237. United States Court of Appeals,District of

OPINION BY Judge ROBERT SIMPSON. Scott T. Young (Plaintiff), representing himself, appeals from a March 13, 2015 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County 1 (trial court) denying Young's motion for reconsideration of its March 4, 2015 order sustaining preliminary objections to Young's complaint seek

KRUPANSKY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which MOORE, J., joined. DAUGHTREY, J. (p. 445), delivered a separate concurring opinion. KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge. This action concerns the 1990 discharge of an individual from a large accounting firm. Appellee Peyton Larue Simpson (“Simpson”) *439sought federal judicial redress for his termina

{¶ 1} Defendant, Martha Simpson, appeals from her conviction for arson and the aggregate sentence of three years that the trial court imposed for that offense and for two prior offenses after it revoked community-control sanctions that had been imposed for those offenses. {¶ 2} Defendant's conviction for arson was entered on her plea of no contest. The plea was the product of a bargain between defendant and the state. When it accepted her p

369 So.2d 376 (1979) John T. SIMPSON, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. Roy G. YOUNG, Appellee. No. KK-356. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. March 27, 1979. Ken Davis of Davis & Judkins, Tallahassee, for appellants. James C. Truett of Truett & Oertel, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Peele and Simpson appeal a j

The majority denies additional benefits to plaintiff under a technical reading of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-47. I respectfully dissent. In the case at hand, plaintiff suffered an admittedly compensable injury to his back on 4 September 2000. Admirably, despite continuing pain, this injured worker returned to employment and continued to work at various truck-driving jobs. In July 2002, however, the plaintiff was incapacitated by back pain when, on 3 Ju

PER CURIAM: Plaintiff-appellants, the family of Diana Simpson, challenge the district court’s summary judgment dismissing . their § 1983 lawsuit claiming that Young County violated Mrs. Simpson’s constitutional rights when she died in the county jail from a probable suicide-caused drug overdose the evening after she was arrested for public intoxication. The family asserts that the County is liable for the acts and omissions

The undersigned respectfully dissents from the Opinion and Award of the majority awarding plaintiff total disability compensation from July 3, 2002 through September 10, 2004. The greater weight of the competent evidence proves that defendants sufficiently rebutted the presumption that plaintiff was disabled during this time period due to his September 10, 2000 work related injury. On November 22, 2000, following plaintiff's 2000 injury, plaintiff was evaluated by Dr. Welshofer, the on

Opinion by JUDGE WEBB 4 1 This case presents another novel question that arises from the conflict between Colorado law and federal law concerning marijuana-does 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) provide a remedy for state action that violates a right created by the Medical Marijuana Amendment, article XVIII, section 14 of the Colorado Constitution (MMA)? Because federal law eriminalizes possession of marijuana, we concl

OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE LEAVITT Otto Young petitions for review of an adjudication of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Parole Board) denying his request for administrative relief from one of the terms of his recommitment as a convicted parole violator. Young contends that the Parole Board erred by revoking sentence credit it had previously awarded him in a prior recomm

*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Ledford and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties. The Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Ledford with modifications and enters the following Opinion a

605 S.E.2d 39 (2004) SIMPSON v. INFINITY SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY. No. A04A1079. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 3, 2004. Reconsideration Denied September 22, 2004. Certiorari Denied January 10, 2005. *40 Charles A. Gower, O. Wayne Ellerbee, William A. Turner, Jr., Teresa T. Abell, Valdost

C. A. 6th Cir. Motions of 16 law firms and Arthur Anderson LLP et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.