Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 120,946 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ROBERT WILLARD COLSON, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. While a conviction cannot be sustained by a presumption based

JACK CARTER, Justice, dissenting. In Ford v. State, the police officer testified that Ford’s vehicle was “following too close behind another vehicle.” 158 S.W.3d 488 (Tex.Crim.App.2005). This presented no factual detail to allow a neutral magistrate to evaluate Ford’s conduct. Here, the testimony is very similar. The officer testified Young was following too close and would have been unable to stop with

MEMORANDUM OPINION arid ORDER Young B. Kim-, United States Magistrate Judge Bryan Colson claims that he is entitled to Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) *782because he is disabled by a combination of back and other bodily pain, hypertension, borderline intellectual functioning, and depression. After the Appeals Council declined to review the Adm

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT1 AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR RELIEF ON BRADY2 CLAIMS JON P. MeCALLA, Chief Judge. I. SUPREME COURT REMAND AND MANDATE 933 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 933 III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 933 IV. CONE’S PETITION FOR HABEAS CORP

680 F.3d 596 (2012) Donald Wayne STROUTH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roland COLSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 08-6116. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: April 17, 2012. Decided and Filed: May 23, 2012. *599 ARGUED: Jerome C. Del Pino, Federal Public Defender's Office, Nashville, Tennesse

ACCEPTED 01-14-01020-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

ROGERS, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I join all but parts III. B. and VI. B. 1. of the majority’s opinion. First, the Tennessee Supreme Court was not unreasonable in finding insufficient prejudice from the prosecutor’s clearly improper remarks. Equating the defendant with the devil incarnate, Susan Smith, and Jeffery Dahmer was clearly improper. But the Tennessee Supreme Court could reasonabl

*509 OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: Ronald Colson pleaded guilty to six counts of receiving movies depicting actual female minors engaged in actual and simulated genital and oral sex with adult males, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2). Because Colson had a pri- or state con

OPINION ROGERS, Circuit Judge. Heck Van Tran, a Tennessee prisoner under sentence of death, appeals the district court’s judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Van Tran raised twenty-six claims in his original habeas petition. The district court and this court have certified three claims for this appeal: (1)

OPINION & ORDER HENRY M. HERLONG, JR., Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on Defendant Geoffrey D. Stiller’s (“Dr. Stiller”) motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). For the reasons explained below, the court grants Dr. Stiller’s motion. I. Factual and PROCedural Background Plaintiffs William G. Colson, Jr. (“Co

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM: In this products liability action, Raymond Colson seeks to recover damages for injuries sustained when he was struck by a rock thrown by a “bush hog” rotary mowing machine manufactured by defendant Allied Products Corporation. The district court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, holding there was no evidence t

801 So.2d 648 (2001) Ronald B. COLSON, Jr. (II), Ronald B. Colson and Virginia Colson v. Eric JOHNSON, et al. No. 01-967. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. December 12, 2001. *649 Richard Starling, Pineville, LA, Attorney for the Plaintiff/Appellant Ronald B. Colson, Jr. (II). Paul Boudreaux, Jr., Alexandria, LA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON ASSIGNED ON BRIEFS JUNE 6, 2006 MICHAEL MOSBY v. ROLAND COLSON, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lauderdale County No. 6012 JosephWalker, Judge No. W2006-00490-COA-R3-CV - Filed August 14, 2006 The plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the Tennessee Department of Cor

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 22, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

PER CURIAM. The plaintiff, who claimed damages for an injury resulting from an automobile collision, appeals a summary final judgment for the defendant who was the owner of the other car involved in the collision. The owner, defendant, prevailed on his motion for summary judgment upon the holding that there was no genuine issue of- fact because it appeared without conflict that the driver of the car was at the time of the acci

OPINION J. STEVEN STAFFORD, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ALAN E. HIGHERS, P.J., W.S., and HOLLY M. KIRBY, J., joined. This case involves the application of the medical malpractice statute of limitations. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendant doctor, finding that the statute of limitations defense was not waived by her failur

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Town of Babylon Board of Appeals dated January 25, 2007, which, after a hearing, granted the application of the respondent Brian Hurley for area variances, the petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Spinner, J.), dated January 28, 2008, as denied the petition and dismissed the proceedi

01/17/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 8, 2017 THOMAS ERNEST YOUNG v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2013-C-2425 Seth W. Norman, Judge No. M2016-02333-CCA-R3-HC The Petit

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Babylon dated November 30, 2006, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s application for area variances, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suf*741folk County (Kerins, J.), dated December 10, 2007, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceedin