Cases

Filed 1/29/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT EDWARD YOON, B301191 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YC071021) v. CAM IX TRUST et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Deird

403 B.R. 597 (2009) In re Charles Adam HERSHMAN, Debtor. Stacia L. Yoon, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. National City Mortgage Co. d/b/a Commonwealth United Mortgage Co. and Charles Adam Hershman, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 07-22840 JPK. Adversary No. 07-2128. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division. March 31, 2009. *

KAPLAN, District Judge. I concur in the result reached by the majority and so much of the opinion as deals with Yoon’s third, fourth, fifth and sixth claims. I respectfully disagree, however, with the treatment of the CPLR § 3003 point and with the majority’s failure to address the merits of the res jtidi-cata issue insofar as it relates to the first five claims. My first concern is with the majo

263 F.3d 196 (2nd Cir. 2001) B. MAN YOON PLAINTIFF-APPELLANTv.FORDHAM UNIVERSITY FACULTY AND ADMINISTRATIVE RETIREMENT PLAN, FORDHAM UNIVERSITY, AND DONALD D. CIPULLO, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE FORDHAM UNIVERSITY FACULTY AND ADMINISTRATIVE RETIREMENT PLAN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES Docket Nos. 00-9465 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Argued: May 30, 200

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ZOBEL, S.D.J All parties have filed a series of post-judgment motions. Defendants Perrigo Company and L. Perrigo Conipany (collectively, “Perrigo”) renew their motions for judgment as a matter of law’ on all issues *288that were tried to a jury in late December 2016 and, in the alternative, move for a new trial. See Dockets ##2

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Oct 11 2016, 8:35 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral

OPINION BROWN, Judge. Mayfair Investment Corp. and IB 17, LLC1 ("Mayfair" and "Mansur," respectively, and collectively, "Appellants") appeal the trial court's judgment ordering physical partition of property owned by Mayfair and by certain descendants of John and Evaline Holliday (collectively, the "Holliday Heirs" 2). Appellants raise one issue, w

FILED UNDER SEAL MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DAVID L. HORAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE On March 7, 2017, the Court entered a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part Defendant All Pro Distributing, Inc.’s (“All Pro") Second Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Withdraw Improper Objections and Respond Fully to Written Discovery [Dkt. No. 85] and Plaintiff Samsung E

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

Related to ECF Nos. 4, 75, 516, 923, & 938 MEMORANDUM OPINION BARBARA J. HOUSER, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. JURISDICTION, AUTHORITY, AND VENUE... 355 II. PRELIMINARY MATTERS... 356 A. Factual and Computation Stipulations of the Parties... 356 B. Facts Found Due to this Court’s Application of Collateral Estopp