Cases

[Cite as JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Yoo, 2025-Ohio-5519.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 114993 v. : JEASUNG J. YOO,

Opinion LIU, J. Under Code of Civil Procedure section 580b, when an individual borrows money from a bank to buy a home and the bank forecloses on the home, the bank can collect proceeds from the foreclosure sale but nothing more. The bank may not obtain a deficiency judgment against the borrower if the sale proceeds are not enough to repay the loan. At issue h

732 F.Supp.2d 952 (2010) Paul E. ROSENFELD, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. No. C 09-6070 MEJ. United States District Court, N.D. California. August 9, 2010. *957 Marc A. Fisher, Marc A. Fisher Law Offices, Folsom, CA, Stephen Conrad Ruehmann, Law Offices of Stephen C. Ruehmann, Sacramento, CA, for Pl

654 F.Supp.2d 1104 (2009) Andes VEGA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al, Defendants. Case No. CV F 09-1444 LJO GSA. United States District Court, E.D. California. August 26, 2009. *1108 Andes Vega, Tulare, CA, pro se. Fabiola Vega, Tulare, CA, pro se. John M. Sorich, S. Christopher Yoo, Adorno

Opinion FYBEL, J.— Introduction As authorized by Congress, the United States Department of the Treasury implemented the Home Affordable Mortgage Program (HAMP) to help homeowners avoid foreclosure during the housing market crisis of 2008. “The goal of HAMP is to provide relief to borrowers who have defaulted on their mortgage payments or who are likely to default by reducing mortgage pa

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM H. BARBOUR, JR., District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the Motions of Plaintiff to Remand. Having considered the pleadings, the attachments thereto, as well as supporting and opposing authorities, the Court finds the Motions are not well taken and should be denied. I. Factual Background and Procedural History In June of

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DENNIS MONTALI, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION Debtor James Madison Kelley (“Debt- or”) commenced the underlying chapter 11 case more than seven years ago after defaulting on two loans from Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu”); the loans were secured by his residence in Saratoga, California (the “Property”). In this adversary

U.S. Bank N.A. v Fisher (2019 NY Slip Op 01444) U.S. Bank N.A. v Fisher 2019 NY Slip Op 01444 Decided on February 27, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant

794 F.Supp.2d 859 (2011) In re JPMORGAN CHASE BANK HOME EQUITY LINE OF CREDIT LITIGATION. No. 10 C 3647. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 30, 2011. *865 Jay Edelson, Irina Slavina, Edelson McGuire, LLC, Evan M. Meyers, Kamber Edelson LLC, Chicago, IL, for Shannon Hackett, Michael Malcolm, Irina Slavina,

OPINION HURWITZ, Circuit Judge. . The Hawaii Attorney General filed complaints in state court against six credit card providers, alleging that each violated state law by deceptively marketing and improperly enrolling cardholders in add-on credit card products. The card providers removed the cases to federal court, and the Attorney General moved to rem

PER CURIAM: The Attorney General of Mississippi (the “State”) filed six in parens patriae complaints in the Mississippi Chancery Court alleging six credit card companies (“Defen *82 dants”) violated the Mississippi Consumer Protection Act (“MCPA”) by charging consumers for product

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff the State of Hawaii, ex rel. David M. Louis, Attorney General’s (the “Attorney General”) Motion for Certification of Question for Interlocutory Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and Motion to Stay Proceedings (“

*1191 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND FOR COSTS AND FEES LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI, District Judge. Plaintiff the State of Hawaii, ex rel. David M. Louie, Attorney General (“the Attorney General”) seeks to remand his lawsuits against several financial entities on the basis that, in each case, there was no federal jurisdiction f

Bank of N.Y. Mellon v Phyllis Theobalds (2018 NY Slip Op 03824) Bank of N.Y. Mellon v Phyllis Theobalds 2018 NY Slip Op 03824 Decided on May 30, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law

In an action to recover on a promissory note brought by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), entered March 30, 2006, which denied the motion. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for the entry of an appropriate

OPINION TAYLOR, Bankruptcy Judge. INTRODUCTION Appellants, chapter 7 1 debtors William David Goldstein and Molly K. Goldstein, appeal the bankruptcy court’s order authorizing the chapter 7 trustee to compromise and sell, as property of the chapter 7 estate, four state court cla

702 F.Supp.2d 1183 (2010) David E. JENSEN, Plaintiff, v. QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP.; Washington Mutual Bank, FA; JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA; and Does 1-10, Inclusive, Defendants. No. 09-CV-01789 OWW-DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. March 22, 2010. *1185 David E. Jensen, Bakersfield, CA, pro se. S. Christop

FILED 1 ORDERED PUBLISHED MAR 03 2015 2 SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 4 OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 5

ACCEPTED 03-16-00581-CV 14442075 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-15-00447-CV 8312763 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS