Cases

698 F.Supp.2d 523 (2010) Lindsey YEAGER, Plaintiff, v. UPMC HORIZON, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-00893. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 17, 2010. *528 Dirk D. Beuth, Neal A. Sanders, Law Office of Neal Alan Sanders, Butler, PA, for Plaintiff. John J. Myers, Christina I. Kepplinger, Eckert, Seamans

Given, J. — I. The questions discussed involve a consideration of the facts as shown in the evidence, and which are substantially as follows: Prior to November 2, 1891, the plaintiff, then over nineteen years of age, applied to the defendant’s train master for employment, and was promised a position when a vacancy occurred. Later, he was informed that there was a place for him, but that he must have his father’s written consent tha

White, J. This is an appeal from the granting of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict in a legal malpractice action. The plaintiff appeals to this court. An extended recitation of the path this litigation followed is necessary for an understanding of the issues presented to us for decision. The appellant, Terry Staman, a resident of Crawford, Nebraska, began working for the Burlington Norther

469 N.W.2d 532 (1991) 238 Neb. 133 Terry STAMAN, Appellant, v. YEAGER & YEAGER, P.A., an Unincorporated Professional Association, et al., Appellees. No. 88-713. Supreme Court of Nebraska. May 17, 1991. *533 Robert G. Pahlke, of Van Steenberg, Chaloupka, Mullin, Holyoke, Pahlke, Smith, Snyder & Hofm

101 N.W.2d 856 (1960) 170 Neb. 77 In the Matter of the Assessment and Valuation of the Property of the CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY, etc. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND ASSESSMENT of the State of Nebraska, Appellee. No. 34713. Supreme Court of Nebraska. March 18, 1

41 N.W.2d 157 (1950) 152 Neb. 352 Application of CHICAGO, B. & Q. R. CO. CHICAGO, B. & Q. R. CO. v. MUNICPALITIES OF HOLDREGE et al. No. 32706. Supreme Court of Nebraska. February 9, 1950. *159 J. W. Weingarten, Omaha, W. P. Loomis, Omaha, Aten & Chadderdon, Holdrege, for appellant.

Nancy Steffen Rahmeyer, P.J. Amber Hale ("Plaintiff") was injured when the vehicle she was driving collided with a train owned and operated by BNSF Railway Company ("Defendant" or "BNSF") at a railroad crossing in Webster County, in March 2008. Plaintiff filed suit in May 2009. Judge John W. Sims initially was assigned to the case and granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant and dismissed Plaintiff's suit. Plaintiff appealed a

335 F.Supp.2d 39 (2004) ALLIANCE FOR DEMOCRACY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 02-0527 EGS. United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 2, 2004. *40 Brenda Wright, Boston, MA, Daniel Mach, Jenner & Block, Washington, DC, John C. Bonifaz, Boston, MA, Jordan B. Yeager

DeGUILIO, District Judge. This appeal is the latest chapter in the story of the Environmental Chemical and Conservation Company (“Enviro-Chem”), a defunct Indiana corporation with an expensive environmental legacy. EnviroChem conducted waste-handling and disposal operations at three sites north of Zionsville, Indiana, until it closed its doors in the early 1980s, and it left cons

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 04/23/2026 08:07 AM CDT - 246 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 321 Nebraska Reports CRAMER v. UNION PACIFIC RR. CO. Cite as 321 Neb. 246 Chaylea Cramer, appellee and cross-appel

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/01/2026 01:12 AM CDT - 246 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 321 Nebraska Reports CRAMER v. UNION PACIFIC RR. CO. Cite as 321 Neb. 246 Chaylea Cramer, appellee and cross-appel

DeGUILIO, District Judge. This appeal is the latest chapter in the story of the Environmental Chemical and Conservation Company (“Enviro-Chem”), a defunct Indiana corporation with an expensive environmental legacy. EnviroChem conducted waste-handling and disposal operations at three sites north of Zionsville, Indiana, until it closed its doors in the early 1980s, and it left considerable amounts of pollutants behind. The pla

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO JOIN A NECESSARY PARTY UNDER RULE 19(a) WALTERS, Chief United States Magistrate Judge. The above resisted motion is before the Court (# 18). The Court has carefully considered the motion papers and now rules as follows. Plaintiffs decedent, Kenneth C. Timbrook, a railroad switchman employed by Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (the railroad),

879 F.Supp. 518 (1994) Howard RANDOLPH, Jr., Plaintiff, v. COOPER INDUSTRIES, Cooper Power Systems Division, William E. Lancaster, Geoffery Hodge, and Donald Yeager, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 93-1813. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. December 7, 1994. *519 Howard Randolph, Jr., Verona, PA, pro se. Buchanan In

DECISION AND ORDER MYRON L. GORDON, Senior District Judge. The plaintiff seeks redress under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, (FELA), *96345 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. for the emotional injuries he sustained as a result of the alleged negligence of his employer. The defendant, Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Company, has moved for summar

KELLY, J. odissenting). I concur with Justice CAVANAGH’s dissent. I write this opinion to point out that the majority’s interpretation creates an absurd result, one that the Court should not permit. It is absurd to conclude that the Legislature intended to jettison no-fault claims of children and mentally impaired persons. I agree also with Justices MArkmAN, WEAVER

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALAN C. KAY, Senior District Judge. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On February 7, 2013, Plaintiff Shannon Wigent (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Science Applications International Corporation, now known as Leídos Holdings, Inc. (“Leídos” or “Defendant”), in the Circuit Court of t

Filed 9/16/20 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, E069462 Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and (Super.Ct.No. RIC1412266) Appellant,

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Rule 50(b) Motion, and Memorandum in Support, Requesting for the Judgment on the Jury Verdict to Stand; to Find Defendants Have Qualified Immunity; and to Enter Judgment as a Matter of Law in Favor of Defendants, filed July 26, 2012 (Doc. 201)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on June 14, 2013. The primary issues

736 F.Supp.2d 1138 (2010) Michelle L. SATTERFIELD, Plaintiff, v. James A. KARNES, in both his individual and official capacities, Franklin County Sheriff, Defendant. Case No. 2:08-cv-387. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. August 23, 2010. *1142 Edward Reilley Forman, Marshall and Morrow LLC, John Spencele