Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Yates v. Summit Acceptance Corporation”
Lingam v. Dish Network Corporationpublic domain
Appellate Case: 25-1157 Document: 39 Date Filed: 02/17/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 17, 2026
Shepherd v. Summit Management Co., Inc.public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 688 The plaintiff, Dorothy Shepherd, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant, Summit Management Company, Inc. A summary judgment is properly entered if the pleadings, depositions, affidavits, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file show that there is no genuine issue a
241 B.R. 247 (1999) In re YATES DEVELOPMENT, INC., Debtor. Yates Development, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Old Kings Interchange, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 98-06579-BKC-3P1. Adversary No. 99-171. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. November 18, 1999. *248 *249
ACCEPTED 03-14-00667-CV 3957344 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Southco, Inc. v. Kanebridge Corporationpublic domain
390 F.3d 276 SOUTHCO, INC., Appellantv.KANEBRIDGE CORPORATION. No. 02-1243. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued: December 3, 2002. Reargued En Banc: October 8, 2003. Filed: December 3, 2004. James C. McConnon (Argued), Alex R. Sluzas, Paul & Pau
441 F.2d 1302 BOSTON SECURITIES, INC., a Corporation, Appellee,v.UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant,and Bruce L. Yates, an Individual.BOSTON SECURITIES, INC., a Corporation, United BondingInsurance Company, a Corporation, Appellee,v.Bruce L. YATES, an Individual, Appellant. Nos. 20241, 20248. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Appellee=s Second Motion for Rehearing Granted in Part; Affirmed in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part, Opinion on Rehearing filed January 19, 2006 Withdrawn; and Substitute Opinion on Rehearing filed March 30, 2006 Appellee=s Second Motion for Rehearing Granted in Part; Affirmed in Part, Reversed and R
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
Briggs v. Wix Corporationpublic domain
308 F.Supp. 162 (1969) Southwick W. BRIGGS and Stone Filter Company, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. WIX CORPORATION, Western Auto Supply Company, Montgomery Ward & Company and Sears, Roebuck & Company, and Fram Corporation, Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 65-C-1307, 65-C-1308, 65-C-1683-65-C-1685. United States District Court N. D. Illinois, E. D. July 25, 1969.
AGRELIANT GENETICS, LLC v. Gary Hamstra Farms, Inc.public domain
FILED Jul 12 2023, 8:30 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
Sutey Oil v. Monroe's High Countrypublic domain
03/15/2022 DA 21-0140 Case Number: DA 21-0140 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2022 MT 50 SUTEY OIL COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee, and Cross-Appellant, v. MONRO
Metzger v. Brotmanpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Thorp v. Charlwoodpublic domain
2021 UT App 118 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS DANIEL T. THORP, Appellant, v. TIMOTHY P. CHARLWOOD, Appellee. Opinion No. 20190981-CA Filed November 4, 2021 Third District Court, Silver Summit Department The Honorable Kent R. Holmberg
Runyon v. Hawleypublic domain
[Cite as Runyon v. Hawley, 2018-Ohio-2444.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) JEFFREY A. RUNYON C.A. No. 17CA011141 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE JOEL D. HAWLEY, et al.
Hoerig v. Bowling Green State Univ.public domain
[Cite as Hoerig v. Bowling Green State Univ., 2023-Ohio-3189.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY Andrea Hoerig, et al. Court of Appeals No. WD-22-047 Appellants Trial Court No. 2021CV0456 v. Bowling Green State University, et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT
Harris v. Rossipublic domain
THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J. {¶ 1} Appellant/cross-appellee, Forest Glen Properties, LLC, appeals the trial court's decision entering summary judgment in favor of appellees/cross-appellants Michael D. Rossi and Guarnieri & Secrest, PLL (collectively Rossi). Rossi cross-appeals from the judgment entry granting summary judgment as well as the trial court's decision overruling Rossi's mot
RHDK Oil & Gas, L.L.C. v. Willowbrook Coal Co.public domain
[Cite as RHDK Oil & Gas, L.L.C. v. Willowbrook Coal Co., 2024-Ohio-1134.] COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT RHDK OIL & GAS, LLC DBA RED : JUDGES: HILL DEVELOPMENT, ET AL. : : :
Dominguez v. Bontapublic domain
Filed 12/19/22; Modified and Certified for Pub.1/6/23 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRACY DOMINGUEZ et al., F082053 & F082208 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. BVC-20-101229) v. ROB BONTA, as Att
Vicky Bass Haynes v. Benton Ned Basspublic domain
Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 385 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-20-752 Opinion Delivered September 13, 2023 VICKY BASS HAYNES APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 26DR-07-1156] V.
Dominguez v. Bontapublic domain
Filed 12/19/22; Modified and Certified for Pub.1/6/23 (order attached) NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA