Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) NING YE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-103 (ESH) ) ERIC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) NING YE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-103 (ESH) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) NING YE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-104 (ESH) ) ERIC

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner, Mao Ye, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of a January 11, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the December 5, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Thomas J. Mulligan denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Mao Ye, No. A98 892 943 (B.I.A. Jan. 11, 2008), aff'g No. A98 892 943 (Immig. Ct. N.Y

SUMMARY ORDER Xiong Cheng Ye, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a December 19, 2007 order of the BIA, affirming the February 7, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Sandy Horn, which denied his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Xiong Cheng Ye, No. A95 708 515 (B.I.A. Dec. 19, 2007), aff'g

SUMMARY ORDER Hua-Geng Ye, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a May 15, 2007 order of the BIA affirming the August 29, 2005 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Steven R. Abrams, which denied his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Ye Hua-Geng, No. A98 384 262 (B.I.A. May 15, 2007), aff'g No. A98

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Da Fa Ye, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of an October 28, 2006 order of the BIA affirming the December 6, 2004 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) William F. Jankun denying Ye’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Da Fa Ye, No. A 79 683 188 (B.I.A. Oct. 23, 2006), aff'g

SUMMARY ORDER Lin Ye Zheng, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a January 3, 2008 order of the BIA, affirming the September 12, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Douglas B. Schoppert, which denied his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Lin Ye Zheng, No. A98 719 408 (B.I.A. Jan. 3, 2008), ajfg

ORDER On May 5, 2004, Ye Mon Aung, a native and citizen of Burma, filed an application for asylum in the United States. At the conclusion of an asylum hearing on May 3, 2005, the immigration judge issued an oral decision denying Aung’s application, finding that Aung failed to testify credibly. Aung filed a timely notice of appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals on May 16, 2005. On July 14, 2006, the Board affirmed, without comme

514 F.3d 643 (2008) Jose Gregorio VASQUEZ SALAZAR; Yeing Yerlang Hernandez Vasquez; Katiuska. Andreina Vasquez Hernandez; Tibisay. Margarita Hernandez De Vasquez; Antonie Yusberth Vasquez Hernandez; Jose Gregorio Vasquez Hernandez, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. No. 07-3051. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. S

BURROUGHS, District Judge. Ye Xian Jing a/k/a Xian Jing Ye (‘Ye”), a native of China, filed a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, which dismissed his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) de *41 nial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and prot

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Ming X. Ye, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a July 26, 2013 decision of the BIA affirming a December 1, 2011 decision of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying Ye’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and declining to remand for consideration of new evidence. In re Ming X. Ye, No. A099 531

SUMMARY ORDER Zhong Ye and Hong Ye, natives and citizens of the People’s Republic of China, seek review of a December 22, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the March 9, 2007 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Sandy K. Horn, denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Zhong Ye & Hong Ye, No. A094. 797 850, No. A099 672 795 (B.I.A. De

SUMMARY ORDER Jian Chiu Ye, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of a March 20, 2007 order of the BIA affirming the March 6, 2001 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Sandy Horn, denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Jian Chiu Ye, No. A77 866 466 (B.I.A. Mar. 20, 2007), aff'g No. A77 866 466 (Immig. Ct. N.Y. City Ma

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Xian-Guan Ye, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a January 2, 2008 order of the BIA, affirming the September 27, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Paul A. DeFonzo, which denied his motion to reopen, and denying his motion to reeon-*94sider. In re Xian-Guan Ye, No. A073 169 702 (B.I.A. Jan.

SUMMARY ORDER Lun Ye Chao, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a June 11, 2008 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings. In re Lun Ye Chao, No. A74 588 511 (B.I.A. June 11, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case. An alien may only file one motion to reopen and must do s

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Fa Ming Ye (‘Ye”), a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of the March 13, 2006 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his “Motion to Reconsider Motion to Reopen.” In re Fa Ming Ye, No. A77 341 575 (B.I.A. Mar. 13, 2006). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the *509underlying facts

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Yi Yan Ye, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a February 28, 2008 order of the BIA, denying her motion to reopen. In re Yi Yan Ye, No. A077 309 099 (B.I.A. Feb. 28, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We review the agency’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of disc

SUMMARY ORDER Zhong Ye and Hong Ye, natives and citizens of the People’s Republic of China, seek review of a December 22, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the March 9, 2007 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Sandy K. Horn, denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Zhong Ye & Hong Ye, No. A094. 797 850, No. A099 672 795 (B.I.A. De

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Xian-Guan Ye, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a January 2, 2008 order of the BIA, affirming the September 27, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Paul A. DeFonzo, which denied his motion to reopen, and denying his motion to reeon-*94sider. In re Xian-Guan Ye, No. A073 169 702 (B.I.A. Jan.