⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “YATES v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP”

Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013-06-18 · Published · cited 0× · 115 So. 3d 891; 2013 WL 2996161; 2013 Miss. App. LEXIS 356
LEE, C.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. In this premises-liability case, we must determine whether summary judgment was appropriate. Finding no error, we affirm. PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 2. On March 8, 2011, Emmett Mickens filed suit in the Lowndes County Circuit Court against Wal-Mart Stores LP alleging negligence. Mickens sustained injuries after a bottle of bleach leaked onto hi
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2009-05-26 · Published · cited 0× · 618 F. Supp. 2d 565; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49391; 2009 WL 1473934
618 F.Supp.2d 565 (2009) Janice HILES, Plaintiff v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:09CV203TSL-JCS. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. May 26, 2009. *566 Mark K. Tullos, The Tullos Law Firm, PA, Raleigh, MS, W. Terrell Stubbs, Attorney, Mendenhall, MS, for Plaintiff.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2011-09-26 · Published · cited 0× · 813 F. Supp. 2d 815; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110988; 2011 WL 4463251
MEMORANDUM OPINION SHARION AYCOCK, District Judge. Before the Court are Motions to Dismiss [31, 33] for failure to state a claim filed by Defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and *817Claims Management, Inc. The Court finds as follows: FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS On October 12, 2008, Plaintiff Carol Fikes was sho
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019-12-09 · Published · cited 1× · 2019 Ohio 5037
[Cite as Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP, 2019-Ohio-5037.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY PAMELA K. SMITH, CASE NO. 1-19-45 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, ET AL. OPINION DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. Appeal from Allen County Com
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999-09-17 · Published · cited 5× · 72 F. Supp. 2d 576; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16805; 1999 WL 988673
72 F.Supp.2d 576 (1999) FORREST DRIVE ASSOCIATES, a North Carolina General Partnership, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant. No. 1:98CV00519. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. September 17, 1999. *577 *578 Gary V. Mauney, Wyrick, Robbins, Yates & Ponton, L.L.P.,
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-04-13 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-14-00370-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/13/2015 4:04:08 PM
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
Guilford v. Zanerpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023-06-26 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 Ohio 2098
[Cite as Guilford v. Zaner, 2023-Ohio-2098.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT DEFIANCE COUNTY BRUCE E. GUILFORD, CASE NO. 4-22-19 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LORIN ZANER, ESQ., OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. Appeal from Defiance County Common Pleas Court
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-06-26 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________ ) THOMASINE WASHINGTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-2742 (ABJ) ) LEVY FOOD SERVICE,
Carman v. Wielandpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013-07-16 · Published · cited 23× · 406 S.W.3d 70; 2013 WL 3667931; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 839
LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Presiding Judge. The plaintiff, Jan Carman, appeals the grant of summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in favor of the defendant, Pat Wieland. The defendant moved for summary judgment on two different bases. The trial court granted summary judgment on one basis, but denied it on the other. Generally two wrongs don’t make a right. Today is an exception. For today we affirm the gran
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2018-08-30 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-16-00272-CV ____________________ JOE R. CHAPMAN, Appellant V. QAMAR U. ARFEEN, ET AL, Appellees __________________________________________________________
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-04-06 · Published · cited 22× · 993 F.3d 774
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OLEAN WHOLESALE GROCERY No. 19-56514 COOPERATIVE, INC.; BEVERLY YOUNGBLOOD; PACIFIC GROSERVICE, D.C. No. INC., DBA Pitco Foods; CAPITOL 3:15-md-02670- HILL SUPERMARKET; LOUISE ANN JLS-MDD DAVIS MATTHEWS; JAMES WALNUM; COLIN MOORE; JENNIFER A. NELSON; ELIZABETH DAVIS-BERG; LAURA OPINION CHILDS; NANCY STILLER; BONNIE VANDERLAAN; KRISTIN MILLICAN; TREPCO IMPORTS AND
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-04-06 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OLEAN WHOLESALE GROCERY No. 19-56514 COOPERATIVE, INC.; BEVERLY YOUNGBLOOD; PACIFIC GROSERVICE, D.C. No. INC., DBA Pitco Foods; CAPITOL 3:15-md-02670- HILL SUPERMARKET; LOUISE ANN JLS-MDD DAVIS MATTHEWS; JAMES WALNUM; COLIN MOORE; JENNIFER A. NELSON; ELIZABETH DAVIS-BERG; LAURA OPINION CHILDS; NANCY STILLER; BONNIE VANDERLAAN; KRISTIN MILLICAN; TREPCO IMPORTS AND
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-04-08 · Published · cited 217× · 31 F.4th 651
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OLEAN WHOLESALE GROCERY No. 19-56514 COOPERATIVE, INC., BEVERLY YOUNGBLOOD, PACIFIC D.C. No. GROSERVICE, INC., DBA Pitco 3:15-md-02670- Foods, CAPITOL HILL DMS-MDD SUPERMARKET, LOUISE ANN DAVIS MATTHEWS, JAMES WALNUM, COLIN MOORE, JENNIFER A. NELSON, OPINION ELIZABETH DAVIS-BERG, LAURA CHILDS; NANCY STILLER; BONNIE VANDERLAAN; KRISTIN MILLICAN; T
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019-03-19 · Published · cited 0×
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2005-08-19 · Published · cited 142× · 170 S.W.3d 242; 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6770; 2005 WL 1994946
170 S.W.3d 242 (2005) Dennis NAUSLAR and Nauslar Investments, L.L.C., Appellant v. COORS BREWING CO. and Golden Distributing Enterprises, L.P., Appellees. No. 05-04-00704-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. August 19, 2005. *246 Martin J. Siegel, Houston, TX, for Appellant. Jon P. Christiansen, Michael J. Aprahamian, Fo
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019-03-19 · Published · cited 59× · 202 A.3d 262; 331 Conn. 53
PALMER, J. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY...273 II. ALLEGED FACTS...275 III. NEGLIGENT ENTRUSTMENT...278 IV. WRONGFUL DEATH AND CUTPA: ISSUES OF STATE LAW...283 A. CUTPA Standing ...285 B. Statute of Limitation
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012-03-30 · Published · cited 0× · 867 F. Supp. 2d 920; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46589; 2012 WL 1109988
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION & ORDER [Resolving EOF No. 1+9 ] BENITA Y. PEARSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................927 II. BACKGROUND ........................................................927 A. Parties'.............................................................927 1. Plaintif
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010-08-13 · Published · cited 63× · 735 F. Supp. 2d 277
735 F.Supp.2d 277 (2010) In re ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR WAGE & HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION. Nickolas Hickton, et al. v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company, et al., Defendants. This Document Relates to: All Actions. MDL No. 2056. Misc. No. 2:09-mc-00210-JFC. Civ. Nos. 2:07-cv-01687-JFC, 2:09-cv-00815-JFC, 2:09-cv-00816-JFC, 2:09-cv-00824-JFC, 2:09-cv-00832-JFC, 2:09-cv-00833-JFC, 2:09-cv-01188-JFC, 2:09-cv-01321-
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-03-19 · Published · cited 7× · 306 F.R.D. 312; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37256; 2015 WL 1321479
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Supporting Brief to Determine That This Matter Proceed as a Class Action, filed January 6, 2014 (Doe. 194)(“Motion”). The Court held a two-part class certification hearing with its first portion on March 10,11, and 12, 2014, and its second portion on April 3 and 4, 2014.