Cases

144 P.3d 1142 (2006) 2006 UT 57 XIAO YANG LI, Yi Wei, and Ke Qing Peng, individuals; and Zahn Shiwei, an heir of Zhang Keming, deceased; Dai Youzhi, an heir of Tang Shouyin, deceased; Chen Zhaoying, an heir of Liao Liusheng, deceased; Fan Hua, an heir of Deng Guoyang, deceased; Liu Xiaoxia, an heir of Ouyang Zao, deceased; Zhou Mi, an heir of He Yunkun, deceased; and Gong Guiyuan, an heir of Huang He, deceased; all personal repres

193 P.3d 630 (2008) 2008 UT 60 Lemanda Lillian MECHAM, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Sean D. FRAZIER and David L. Johnson, Defendants and Appellants. No. 20070730. Supreme Court of Utah. August 29, 2008. *631 Cory B. Mattson, Sandy, for plaintiff. Mark L. Shurtleff, Att'y Gen., J. Clifford Petersen, Sc

OPINION OF THE COURT (April 26, 2017) Cabret, Associate Justice. Ellen Stewart, Perry Cowan, Delia Thomas, Hilary Activille, Anthony Romano, Andrea King, Donald King, Carolyn Tyson, Mr. and Mrs. Petrosky, and A. Jeffrey Weiss (collectively “appellants”), neighboring land owners in Vessup Bay Estates, St. Thomas, appeal from a Superior Court order dismissing their action for declarato

Justice LEE, dissenting: 139 Today the court affords to indigent defendants the right to demand government-funded defense resources even after declining the legal aid defense established for that *500purpose. In so doing, the court discounts recent amendments to the Utah Indigent Defense Act (IDA) that designate legal aid as the "exclusive source" of a

Justice LEE, dissenting: 189 Today the court affords to indigent defendants the right to demand government-funded defense resources even after declining the legal aid defense established for that purpose. In so doing, the court discounts recent amendments to the Utah Indigent Defense Act (IDA) that designate legal aid as the "exclusive source" of a public defense. Utax Cope Ann. § 77-832-806(4) (2008). I respec

Justice LEE, dissenting: £39 Today the court affords to indigent defendants the right to demand government-funded defense resources even after declining the legal aid defense established for that *476purpose. In so doing, the court discounts recent amendments to the Utah Indigent Defense Act (IDA) that designate legal aid as the "exclusive source" of a

Justice LEE, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 State and federal securities laws require a broker1 of securities to register and secure a license. See Utah Code § 61-1-3; 15 U.S.C. § 78o(a)(l). Noncompliance triggers certain statutory penalties, including the one at the center of this case: Utah Code section 61-1-22(8), which provides that “[a] person who has made or engaged in th

Justice PARRISH, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION T1 This is an appeal from a district court order denying a father's motion to intervene in, object to, or dismiss an adoption proceeding involving his biological daughter. The case involves the adoption of Baby E.Z., born on February 10, 2009 in the State of Virginia. The Appellant, John Wyatt III, argues that the federal Parental Kidnapp

Justice Himonas, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION ¶1 This case comes to us on certification from the United States District Court for the District of Utah. See UTAH R. APP . P. 41. The district court certified three questions relating to the interpretation of the Governmental Immunity Act of Utah, Utah Code sections 63G-

98 P.3d 15 (2004) 2004 UT 70 Jerry FORD, Mark Russell, Robert P. Welch, Travis Kell, J. Mathew Zundel, David K. Eaton, John D. Ford, Robert Aamodt, D. Scott Bunnell, individuals, and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC., a Minnesota Corporation, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20020550. Supreme Court of Utah.

AMENDED OPINION 1 McHUGH, Presiding Judge: T1 Alan, Ash, and Patricia Jenkins (the Jenkinses) appeal from the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District (the District) on the Jenkinges' claim for damages to their home and property after a w

IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS ‐‐‐‐ooOoo‐‐‐‐ Alan Jenkins, Ash Jenkins, and Patricia ) OPINION Jenkins, ) ) Case No. 20100400‐CA Plaintiffs and Appellants, ) ) FILED v. ) (January 6, 2