⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Y.F. v. Lynch”

Thomas v. Lynchpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016-07-05 · Published · cited 20× · 828 F.3d 11; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12373; 2016 WL 3606943
BARRON, Circuit Judge. We must decide in this case whether petitioner Pierre Thomas satisfied the applicable statutory criteria for obtaining derivative citizenship in consequence of his mother’s naturalization. Those criteria were set forth in the derivative citizenship statute that was in effect at the time that Thomas was still a minor. Thomas concedes that he is removable as a
Wu Lin v. Lynchpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016-02-11 · Published · cited 57× · 813 F.3d 122; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 2345; 2016 WL 536359
12-2163 Lin v. Lynch BIA Brennan, IJ A 088 517 180 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2015 Argued: August 25, 2015
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-03-21 · Published · cited 7× · 823 F.3d 508; 2016 WL 1084735
OPINION CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge: Petitioners Reyes Abigail Linares-Gon-zales (“Linares”) and Maribel Preciado (“Preciado”) challenge the denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. The immigration judges (“IJ”) denied then-applications, and the Bureau of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirmed, finding, among other things, that they were ineli
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-10-06 · Published · cited 51× · 803 F.3d 1004; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 17511; 2015 WL 5806148
OPINION BYBEE, Circuit Judge: We are asked to decide whether a conviction for possessing child pornography in violation of California Penal Code § 311.11(a) is an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(I). . We conclude that § 311.11(a) sweeps in a broader range of pornographic depictions than the federal child pornography statute and thus is
Indiana Supreme Court · 2013-05-17 · Published · cited 0× · 987 N.E.2d 1092; 2013 WL 2152530; 2013 Ind. LEXIS 374
PER CURIAM. Evidence at Lynch’s trial showed that one evening in 2009, the mother of a twelve-year-old girl noticed her daughter had received an instant message through an internet account from Lynch, a man in his forties. While pretending to be the girl, the mother participated in an instant message conversation with Lynch. Lynch wanted to see the girl. In one colloquy, Lynch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-05-09 · Published · cited 1× · 2023 NY Slip Op 02455
J.A.F. v Roman Catholic Archdiocese of N.Y. (2023 NY Slip Op 02455) J.A.F. v Roman Catholic Archdiocese of N.Y. 2023 NY Slip Op 02455 Decided on May 09, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-05-09 · Published · cited 1× · 2023 NY Slip Op 02455
J.A.F. v Roman Catholic Archdiocese of N.Y. (2023 NY Slip Op 02455) J.A.F. v Roman Catholic Archdiocese of N.Y. 2023 NY Slip Op 02455 Decided on May 09, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006-12-05 · Published · cited 3× · 483 F.3d 70
JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. The Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Petitioners”) have petitioned for rehearing of our December 5, 2006, decision reversing the District Court’s grant of their motion for class certification. See Miles v. Merrill Lynch & Co. (In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation), 471 F.3d 24 (2d Cir.2006). The petition asserts three grounds: (1) our initial decision adopted incorrect standards
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006-12-05 · Published · cited 267× · 471 F.3d 24; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 29859
JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal primarily concerns the issue, surprisingly unsettled in this Circuit, as to what standards govern a district judge in adjudicating a motion for class certification under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Comprehended within this broad issue are subsidiary issues such as whether a definitive ruling must be made that each Rule 23 requirement has been met or whether only so
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005-01-20 · Published · cited 424× · 396 F.3d 161; 2005 WL 107044
JACOBS, Circuit Judge. John Kilgour Lentell and Brett and Juliet Raynes, as lead plaintiffs for purchasers of the publicly traded stock of two internet companies, appeal from the dismissal by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Pollack, J.) of their securities-fraud actions against Merrill Lynch & Co. and its former star analyst, Henry M. Blodget (collectively, “Merrill Lynch,”
Jeffries v. Lynchpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-07-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TIMOTHY JEFFRIES, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 15-cv-1007 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell MERRICK GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Lynch v. McDonoughpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021-12-17 · Published · cited 9× · 21 F.4th 776
Case: 20-2067 Document: 65 Page: 1 Filed: 12/17/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JOE A. LYNCH, Claimant-Appellant v. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2020-2067 ______________________ A
Lynch v. McDonoughpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021-12-17 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 20-2067 Document: 65 Page: 1 Filed: 12/17/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JOE A. LYNCH, Claimant-Appellant v. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2020-2067 ______________________ A
Lynch v. McDonoughpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021-06-03 · Published · cited 2× · 999 F.3d 1391
Case: 20-2067 Document: 47 Page: 1 Filed: 06/03/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JOE A. LYNCH, Claimant-Appellant v. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2020-2067 ______________________ Appe
State v. Lynchpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020-05-19 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-358 Filed: 19 May 2020 Lenoir County, Nos. 16CRS050202, 17CRS000096-97 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JUSTIN LAVONE LYNCH, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from judgment entered 19 March 2018 by Judge Charles Henry in Lenoir County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 18 March 2020. Attorney General Joshua H. Stein b
Lynch v. Berryhillpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-03-26 · Published · cited 3× · 368 F. Supp. 3d 292
Timothy S. Hillman, United States District Judge This is an action for judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the "Commissioner" or "SSA") denying the application of Joseph T. Lynch ("Plaintiff") for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits. 42 U.S.C. §§ 405
Miller v. Lynchpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019-06-21 · Published · cited 9× · 830 S.E.2d 749
Miller, Presiding Judge. This is the second appearance of this case before the Court, the previous appearance being reported in Miller v. FiberLight, LLC , 343 Ga. App. 593, 808 S.E.2d 75 (2017) (" M
New York Supreme Court · 1995-04-03 · Published · cited 2× · 164 Misc. 2d 963; 627 N.Y.S.2d 255; 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 228
OPINION OF THE COURT David Goldstein, J. This is a motion by defendant Taormina for an order granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint, pursuant to CPLR 3212. The action was brought to recover damages for the wrongful *964death of plaintiffs decedent, Michael D. Wagner, Jr., who, on October 26, 1991, was struck and kill
State v. Lynchpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020-05-19 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-358 Filed: 19 May 2020 Lenoir County, Nos. 16CRS050202, 17CRS000096-97 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JUSTIN LAVONE LYNCH, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from judgment entered 19 March 2018 by Judge Charles Henry in Lenoir County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 18 March 2020. Attorney General Joshua H. Stein b
Lynch v. Barnardpublic domain
District Court, E.D. New York · 2018-09-19 · Published · cited 14× · 590 B.R. 30
SEYBERT, District Judge: Currently pending before the Court is an appeal filed by Maura Lynch ("Debtor"), appearing pro se, from an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York ("Bankruptcy Court"), Judge Alan S. Trust, dated June 28, 2017, converting Debtor's Chapter 11 case to a Chapter 7 proceeding (the "Conversion Order"). (See Conversion Order, Docket Entry 1, at EC