Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 10, 2021 Decided July 19, 2022 No. 20-1295 XCEL ENERGY SERVICES INC., PETITIONER v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT Consolidated with 20-1426 On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Co

ORDER ERICKSON, Chief United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to a general assignment, made in accordance with the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), upon the Motion of the Plaintiff Xcel Energy Inc. (“Xcel”) to compel the Government to produce an amended privilege log, and/or to

BYE, Circuit Judge. Securitas Critical Infrastructure Services, Inc., (Securitas) petitions for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The order allowed a certain class of Securitas’s workers to seek union representation when the NLRB determined that Securitas failed to show the workers were supervisors under Section 2(11) of the National Labor Relation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHNSON & JOHNSON : HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS INC., : Plaintiff, : : v. : : Civil Action No.: 24-3188 (RC) ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.,

McMahon, C.J.: Following a bench trial, the Court, for its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and verdict: Findings of Fact on Liability I.The Parties 1. Plaintiffs in Moore v. Navillus Tile, Inc., No. 14 Civ. 8326 (“the Moore Action”), are Trustees of four different groups of multi-employer fringe benefit funds. 2. Pl

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 15, 2025 Decided October 14, 2025 No. 24-1350 CBOE GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of a Final Rule of the Securities and Exchange Commission Amir C. Tayrani argued

493 F.3d 239 (2007) WISCONSIN PUBLIC POWER INC., Petitioner v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent WPS Resources Corporation, et al., Intervenors. Nos. 04-1414, 05-1006, 05-1007, 05-1198, 05-1203, 05-1358, 05-1427, 05-1428, 05-1429. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued April 26, 2007. Decided July 20, 2007.

HARTZ, Circuit Judge. This appeal concerns whether three revenue-protection workers of the Public Service Company of Colorado (“PSC”) are “supervisors” under § 2(11) of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or “Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 152(11). After the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 111 (“Union”) filed a petition seeking an election to determine whether the three workers desired representation by the U

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 23, 2021 Decided December 7, 2021 No. 20-1104 LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ENTERGY SERVICES, LLC, INTERVENORS

405 F.3d 1071 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner,International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 111, Intervenor. No. 03-9609. No. 03-9615. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. April 26, 2005.

WILKINS, Circuit Judge: Until recently, incumbent public utilities were free to include in their tariffs and agreements “the option to construct any new transmission facilities in their particular service areas, even if the proposal for new construction came from a third party.” S.C. Pub. Serv. Auth. v. FERC (South Carolina), 762 F.3d 41, 72 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (

714 F.Supp.2d 48 (2010) ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH US, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-01470 (ESH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 27, 2010. *50 Jonathan W. Emord, Emord & Associates P.C., Clifton, VA, for Plaintiffs. Carol L. Wallack, U.S. Dep

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH US, ) et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-01470 (ESH) ) KATH

991 So.2d 803 (2008) Donald Dean KASISCHKE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. SC07-128. Supreme Court of Florida. July 10, 2008. Rehearing Denied September 19, 2008. *805 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Thomas Regnier, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Pe