Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-1424 ___________ Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company; * Marvin Windows of Tennessee, Inc., * * Plaintiffs - Appellants, * * v.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On June 28, 2011, Robert Briseno filed a complaint against ConAgra;1 between Oc*938tober and December 2011, the court consolidated several cases filed against ConA-gra under the caption above

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION L. SCOTT COOGLER, District Judge. 1. Introduction Before this Court are cross motions for summary judgment: 1) Defendant Alabama Power Company’s (“Alabama Power’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment as to all of Plaintiffs’ claims, filed on December 12, 2012 (Doc. 81), and 2) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Count One of their Second Amended Com

140 B.R. 643 (1992) In the Matter of HOLLY'S, INC., d/b/a Holly's Landing, Holly's Bistro, Holly's By Golly!, Grazin' in the Brass, Holiday Inn Expressway, Holiday Inn West, Holiday Inn-Grand Rapids South, Holiday Inn-Grand Rapids North, Holly's Holiday Lanes, Holiday Inn-Grand Rapids East, Econolodge-Grand Rapids, Econolodge-Muskegon, Meadowwood Country Club, Nob Hill Bakery, Division Laundry, Holly's Back Door Bar & Grill, Escapades, and formerly <

247 F.Supp.2d 1171 (2003) CAESARS WORLD, INC. and Park Place Entertainment Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Cyrus MILANIAN and the New Las Vegas Development Company, LLC, Defendants. No. CV-S-02-1287-RLH RJJ. United States District Court, D. Nevada. February 19, 2003. *1174 Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, by Stephen W. Feingold, Ric

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

MEMORANDUM OPINION ' JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. The Export-Import Bank of the United States has long been in the business of issuing loan guarantees to support foreign airlines’ purchases of aircraft from domestic manufacturers. While the Bank’s involvement in the air-travel industry undoubtedly serves the interests of

OPINION AND ORDER BLOCK, Judge. This is a breach of contract ease. Plaintiff, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America (“Travelers”), is the assignee of a claim by Red Samm Construction Company (“Red Samm”) asserted against the United States, acting through its agent the United States Army Corps Engineers (the “Corps”). Red Samm entered into a contract with the Corps to improve a small boat harbor

ORDER The opinion filed July 27, 1994, slip op. 8417, is amended as follows: [Editor’s Note: Amendments incorporated for purposes of publication]. With the opinion thus amended, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petitions for rehearing. Judge Schroeder has voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc, Judges Goodwin and Norris so recommend. The full court has been advised o

KING, Circuit Judge: Defendant Tour 18 I, Ltd. appeals the district court’s judgment that it infringed and diluted the plaintiffs’ service marks and one of the three golf-hole designs at issue, and it challenges the district court’s injunction as vague, punitive, and overly broad. See Pebble Beach Co. v. Tour 18 I, Ltd., 942 F.Supp. 1513 (S.D.Tex.1996). Plain

39 F.3d 1398 1994 A.M.C. 2642, 30 Fed.R.Serv.3d 481 Benny CHAN; Victoria Chan, individually and as husband andwife, a marital community; Victoria Chan, as Guardian AdLitem of Samantha Alexis Chan, Zachary Alex Chan, and AmandaElizabeth Chan, minor children, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.SOCIETY EXPEDITIONS, INC., a Washington Corporation, Defendant,andDiscoverer, a West German corporation; Heiko

AMENDED MEMORANDUM, ORDER and JUDGMENT WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. [[Image here]] *14[[Image here]] *15[[Image here]] I.Introduction This case involves claims by Vietnamese nationals and an organization, The Vietnamese

942 F.Supp. 1513 (1996) PEBBLE BEACH COMPANY, Resorts of Pinehurst, Inc., and Sea Pines Company, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. TOUR 18 I, LTD., Defendant. Civil Action No. 93-3875. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 10, 1996. Amended Order and Final Judgment November 6, 1996. *1514

155 F.3d 526 48 U.S.P.Q.2d 1065 PEBBLE BEACH COMPANY; Sea Pines Company Incorporated,Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross Appellants,v.TOUR 18 I LIMITED, Defendant-Appellant-Cross Appellee.RESORTS OF PINEHURST INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant,v.GOLFORMS INCORPORATED; et al., Defendants,Tour 18 I Limited, Defendant-Appellant-Cross Appellee. No. 96-21102.

OPINION OF THE COURT NYGAARD, Circuit Judge. In this Clean Water Act citizen suit, the district court granted summary judgment to plaintiffs Public Interest Research Interest Group of New Jersey and Friends of the Earth (collectively “PIRG”), finding that defendant Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc. (“PDT”) had violated its National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit 386 times over a perio

913 F.2d 64 31 ERC 1905, 59 USLW 2146, 20 Envtl.L. Rep. 21,216 PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP OF NEW JERSEY, INC. andFriends of the Earthv.POWELL DUFFRYN TERMINALS INC., Appellant,United States Environmental Protection Agency, Intervenor.PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP OF NEW JERSEY, INC. andFriends of the Earth, Appellantsv.POWELL DUFFRYN TERMINALS INC.PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GRO

AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge: The question for decision in this matter is whether there is jurisdiction in •admiralty of claims of the bareboat charterer and the owner of a vessel against a shore-based paper mill, en*153gaged in a non-maritime manufacturing activity, on allegations that smoke emitted from the mill so obstructed navigation as to cause the vessel to collide wit

166 F.Supp. 250 (1958) SARKES TARZIAN, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff, v. AUDIO DEVICES, INC., a corporation, et al., Defendants. No. 1237-57. United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division. September 8, 1958. Findings and Judgment October 23, 1958. *251 *252

358 U.S. 354 (1959) ROMERO v. INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL OPERATING CO. ET AL. No. 3. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 13, 1958. Restored to the calendar for reargument May 19, 1958. Reargued October 22-23, 1958. Decided February 24, 1959. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE