Cases

ORDER Jeremy Wright, an inmate at Pontiac Correctional Center, challenges the district court’s decision to grant summary judgment in his § 1983 suit. He alleges that the prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his safety when they denied his request for protective custody. He seeks punitive damages and an injunction to place him permanently in protective custody. The district court concluded that it could not issue an injunc

965 N.E.2d 135 (2012) Sharon WRIGHT and Leslie Wright, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. Anthony E. MILLER, D.P.M. and Achilles Podiatry Group, Appellees-Defendants. No. 54A01-1107-CT-302. Court of Appeals of Indiana. April 5, 2012. *137 James E. Ayers, Wernle, Ristine & Ayers, Crawfordsville, IN, Attorney for Appellants. Pete

963 P.2d 934 (1998) Dennis O. WRIGHT and Mary L. Wright, husband and wife, Respondents, v. Catherine D. MILLER and Kenneth Stocks, Appellants. No. 37486-9-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. September 14, 1998. *936 Jane Elizabeth Rosenstein, Donald Clark Harrison, Jeffrey T. Broihier, Broihier & Wotipka, Seattle,

5 N.Y.3d 703 (2005) PEOPLE EX REL. WRIGHT v. MILLER. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided June 16, 2005. Motion for leave to appeal denied.

973 F.Supp. 390 (1997) Tyrone WRIGHT and George Lyons, Plaintiffs, v. T.J. MILLER, Acting Superintendent, et al., Defendants. No. 96 Civ. 1224(HB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 31, 1997. Opinion Amending Decision August 22, 1997. *391 *392 Tyrone Wright, C

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kavanagh, J.), entered June 16, 2004 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing. In 1995, petitioner was convicted after trial of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree in connection with the shooting death of his stepfather and was sentenced

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

480 F.Supp. 790 (1979) Inez WRIGHT et al., Plaintiffs, v. G. William MILLER et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 76-1426. United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 26, 1979. *791 *792 Robert H. Kapp, Sara-Ann Determan, Norman J. Chachkin, Hogan & Hartson, Robert A. Murphy, Ri

ORDER Appellees’ Request for Reconsideration and Correction of Footnote 4, filed on November 26, 2012, is construed as a Petition for Panel Rehearing. So construed, the petition is GRANTED. The opinion in this case, filed on November 13, 2012, is AMENDED to delete footnote 4, Slip Opinion, p. 13246. No further petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL T. MILLER; AMBER No. 11-35850 LANPHERE; PAUL M. MATHESON , Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:11-cv-05395- v. RBL CHAD WRIGHT , Puyallup Tribe Tax Department, Enforcement Officer; ORDER AND HERMAN DILLON , SR., Chairman AMENDED Puyallup Tribe of Indians;

[Cite as Miller v. Miller, 2020-Ohio-6914.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO REGINA R. MILLER, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellant, : CASE NO. 2019-T-0048 - vs - : AL

984 S.W.2d 936 (1998) Linda Janiece WRIGHT-MILLER, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Harvey Granville MILLER, Defendant/Appellant. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Jackson. August 5, 1998. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied January 11, 1999. Thomas H. Strawn, Kelly, Millar, Strawn & Kelly, Dyersburg, Tennessee, Attorney for Defendant/Appellant. Douglas W.

DAVID, Justice, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in that portion of the majority opinion reversing dismissal of this case pursuant to the Indiana Rules' of Trial Procedure. I agree that it was an abuse of discretion to dismiss the case entirely under the circumstances presented here. I also concur that a formulaic adherence to the factors from Wiseheart v

FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES: JAMES E. AYERS PETER H. POGUE Wernle, Ristine & Ayers JULIE ABBOTT CONDICT Crawfordsville, Indiana Schultz & Pogue, LLP Indianapolis, Indiana FILED

337 S.W.3d 166 (2011) David Lee WRIGHT ex rel. Kaitlyn Lee WRIGHT v. Anita J. WRIGHT et al. No. M2008-01181-SC-R11-CV. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. October 6, 2010 Session. March 29, 2011. *169 James P. Romer, Jamestown, Tennessee, for the appellant, Kaitlyn Lee Wright, a minor, in his capacity as gu

[Cite as State v. Wright, 2018-Ohio-877.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-170278 TRIAL NO. B-1607332 Plaintiff-Appellee, : O P I N I O N. vs.

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed November 12, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive. Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion, money had and received, and breach of fiduciary duty, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), entered December 12, 2014, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) and (7) to dismiss the complaint. Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provisions th

Miller, Judge. {¶ 1} Rachel Wright and Alicia Wise-Davis ("appellants") appeal from the trial court's entry of summary judgment dismissing Dr. Farooq A. Mirza from appellants' medical malpractice and wrongful death action for lack of proper service. We affirm. {¶ 2} Appellants originally brought their lawsuit in 2011. They voluntarily dismissed their complaint on A

*540 Opinion JOHNSON, J. In January 2016, the trial court, pursuant to the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA) (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.), 1 found John Wright (Wright) to be a sexually violent predator (SVP) a