Cases

642 F.3d 148 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Justine WRIGHT, Appellant. No. 10-2970. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued April 14, 2011. Filed: June 1, 2011. *149 Robert Epstein, Brett G. Sweitzer [ARGUED], Mark T. Wilson, Defender Association of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant

236 F.Supp.2d 79 (2002) Paul G. BAMBERG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SG COWEN Defendant. Janet Baker, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SG Cowen Defendant. Janet Baker, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KPMG Singapore Defendant. No. CIV.A.02-CV-10304-PB No. CIV.A.02-CV-10367-PB. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 9, 2002.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 Fazio, et al. v. Nos. 02-3820/3821/3822/3823/ ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2003 FED App. 0284P (6th Cir.) Lehman Bros., 3824/3825/3826/3867/3868/3869/ File Name: 03a0284p.06 et al. 3870/3873/3874; 03-3041/3042/ 3043/3045/3112/3113/

ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: *10361. The petition for panel rehearing in No. 92-5695 is granted. 2. The opinion filed on December 28, 1993, is hereby vacated. 3. A revised panel opinion is hereby issued in the form attached to this Order. 4. The pending petition for rehearing before the full court i

411 F.Supp.2d 717 (2006) Darrell COWEN and Teressa Cowen, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. No. 05-10307 BC. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division. January 31, 2006. *718 James M. Hession, St. Charles, MI, for Plaintiffs. Michael J. Yockey, Kurt D. Yockey, Yockey, Yockey, Fa

POSNER, Chief Judge. The Truth in Lending Act requires lenders covered by the Act to disclose to the borrower at the time of making the loan not only the interest rate but also any “finance charge,” defined as a charge that is payable directly or indirectly by the borrower and imposed directly or indirectly by the lender as an incident to or condition of the loan. 15 U.S.C. § 1605(a); 12 C.F.R. § 226.4(a). The concern behi

Undercofler, Presiding Justice. Marsha Adams appeals the grant of summary judgment against her on the equitable defenses she raised in a dispossessory suit brought by Ernest Wright. In 1974, Marsha’s husband Ronnie had sold the house in question to Wright by warranty deed and had at the same time contracted for an option to repurchase the property at a stated price within two years. Meanwhile he was to pay rent to Wright. Mars

901 F.Supp. 1204 (1995) Ruth Lee COWEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 1:94-CV-0495. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 8, 1995. *1205 John Keith Hyde, Greg Thompson, Provost & Umphrey, Beaumont, TX, for plaintiffs. Gail Cucancic Jenkins, Jenkins Grove &

70 F.3d 937 64 USLW 2366, 33 Fed.R.Serv.3d 138 Linwood COWEN and Jean Cowen, on behalf of themselves andall others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.BANK UNITED OF TEXAS, FSB, doing business as CommonwealthUnited Mortgage, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-1334. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Sept. 1

Opinion by Mr. JUSTICE GOLDBERG.

697 F.Supp.2d 1118 (2010) The FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION, an Arizona non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, v. Steven W. KROETER, an individual; Archetype Associates, Inc., a New York corporation; Archetype Associates, a New York general partnership; Steven Fields Design Associates, a New York general partnership, Defendants. Nos. CV-08-1112-PHX-DGC, CV-08-1125-PHX-FJM. United States District Court, D.

68 Ill. App.3d 437 (1979) 386 N.E.2d 435 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD COWEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 77-1727. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (5th Division). Opinion filed January 19, 1979. Belmonte, Kagan, Hibbler & De Palma, of Chicago (William J. Hibbler and Richard J. Belmonte, of coun

PER CURIAM: Plaintiffs, five homeless individuals who have been diagnosed with clinical symptomatic Human Immunodeficiency Virus (“HIV”) or Aquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (“AIDS”), brought suit on behalf of themselves and a putative class alleging that various officials of the City of New York have failed to provide them with emergency housing that accommodates their disability, as required by Section 504 of the Rehabili

340 F.3d 386 Robert FAZIO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.LEHMAN BROTHERS, INC.; Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Defendants, S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation; Societe Generale, Defendants-Appellants, Hambrecht & Quist, Inc.; J.P. Morgan Chase & Company, Defendants.Robert Fazio, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Lehman Brothers, Inc.; Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation;

54 F.Supp.2d 199 (1999) Melvin Leon WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. Harold DEE, Charles Greiner, and Glenn Goord, Defendants. No. 98 Civ. 1284(DLC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 28, 1999. *200 *201 Melvin Leon Wright, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Stormville, NY, pro se.

508 F.2d 979 Kathleen M. FINNERTY, Individually and on behalf of allother persons similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.James L. COWEN, Individually and as Chairman of the RailroadRetirement Board, and Caspar Weinberger,Individually and as Secretary of Health,Education, and Welfare,Defendants-Appellees. No. 78, Docket 74-1668. United States Court of Appeals, Second C

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Kathleen M. Finnerty, an elderly widow, receives benefits under both the Social Security and Railroad Retirement Acts. Both acts provide for a reduction of benefits when a recipient has certain types of income in excess of an amount fixed by Congress. After both the Social Security Administration and the Railroad Retirement Board reduced plaintiff’s benefits for this reason, she brought s

EDMONDSON, V.C.J. T1 This case involves procedural issues in a gui tom proceeding and a related declaratory judgment proceeding. The first order brought for appeal is a district court order granting a motion, without prejudice, that sought dismissal of a taxpayer gut tam remedy sought against the Oklahoma Corporation Commission and other defendants.1 The see-ond order brought before us on appeal is a d

95 So.2d 584 (1957) Isabel M. COWEN (Papert), Appellant, v. Edward L. COWEN, Appellee. Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division B. June 5, 1957. Sibley & Davis and Thomas H. Barkdull, Jr., Miami Beach, for appellant. Brigham, Black, Niles & Wright, Miami, for appellee. SANDLER, Associate Justice. This appeal brings for review an order or decree dismiss

PER CURIAM. Two sections of the Illinois Election Law require candidates for public office to submit their nominating petitions “neatly fastened together in book form ... and the sheets shall then be numbered consecutively.” Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 46 ¶¶ 7-10, ■ 10-4. Kenneth Moy submitted petitions for a position on the primary ballot for one of the seats on the DuPage County Board.