Cases

JOHN B. ROBBINS, Judge. |,Appellee Christopher Corcoran sustained an admittedly compensable injury to his left knee on March 31, 2008, while working for appellant Richardson Waste, Inc. The appellant accepted and paid for an arthroscopy and debridement of the left knee performed by Dr. Norris Knight on June 16, 2008. However, Richardson Waste controverted Mr. Corcoran’s claim that he was entitl

PER CURIAM. Carlito Cabana appeals the district court’s order dismissing certain defendants from his suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Ind

594 N.W.2d 615 (1999) 256 Neb. 936 Kerry CORCORAN, Appellant, v. Nathaniel LOVERCHECK, Appellee. No. S-97-359. Supreme Court of Nebraska. May 21, 1999. *617 Dan L. McCord, of McCord & Burns Law Firm, Lincoln, for appellant. Stephanie Frazier Stacy and Darla S. Ideus, of Baylor, Evnen, Curtiss, G

MEMORANDUM ** Raymond Wright, a California state prisoner, appeals from the district court’s summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations in connection with an altercation with inmates and a prison official. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment, Barnett v. Centoni 31 F.

MEMORANDUM ** Raymond Wright, a California state prisoner, appeals from the district court’s summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations in connection with an altercation with inmates and a prison official. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment, Barnett v. Centoni 31 F.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-498V (To be published) ************************* HEATHER WRIGHT, * as Mother and Natural Guardian of minor * child, B.W., * * Chief Special Master Corcoran

PER CURIAM: Curtis Wright appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wright v. Sizer, No. l:06-cv-03078-WDQ (D.Md. July 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materi

PER CURIAM: Curtis L. Wright appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wright v. Sondervan, No. CA-03-3378-WDQ (D. Md. filed Nov. 3, 2004; entered Nov. 4, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con

The opinion of the court was delivered by KEEFE, J.A.D. Plaintiff, Thomas Corcoran, sustained a severe injury to his left eye while using a pair of needle nose pliers sold by defendant Sears Roebuck Corporation and manufactured by Western Forge. Plaintiff sued defendant alleging a manufacturing defect. A jury *121found in favor of defendant, findin

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 21-CV-0695 THE CORCORAN GALLERY OF ART AND THE TRUSTEES OF THE CORCORAN GALLERY OF ART, APPELLANTS,

FILED Dec 10 2024, 11:01 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

MEMORANDUM ** California state capital prisoner Sonny Ray Hardaway appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s order for abuse of discretion, see Maraziti v. Thorpe, 52 F.3d 252, 253 (9th Cir.1995

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 20-1060 Filed April 28, 2021 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JOSHUA CORCORAN, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Lee (North) County, John M. Wright, Judge. A defendant appeals his sentences after pleading guilty to three crimes. AFFIRMED.

This is an adverse possession case. The Lockharts filed suit against the Corcorans in the trial court, claiming title to fifteen acres of land by adverse possession. The Corcorans filed a counterclaim for damages allegedly sustained when they were temporarily restrained by the trial court from cutting timber on the subject land. Following a trial in which the evidence was presented to the trial court ore tenus, the trial court entered a judgment in which it foun

BAUER, Circuit Judge. On July 26, 1997, Joseph Corcoran shot and killed four men: his brother Jim Cor-coran, his sister’s fiancé Robert Scott Turner, Timothy Bricker, and Doug Stillwell. An Indiana state court jury convicted Cor-coran of four counts of murder. The trial court agreed with the jury’s determination and sentenced Corcoran to death. Corcor-an exhausted his state court direct appeals and waived state post-convictio

SYKES, Circuit Judge. In 1997 Joseph Corcoran shot and killed four men at his home in Fort Wayne, Indiana. A jury convicted him .of four counts of murder and recommended the death penalty. The trial judge agreed and imposed a death sentence in accordance with the jury’s recommendation. After his appeals in state court had rim their course, Corcoran sought federal habeas relief on mu

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 07-2093 and 07-2182 JOSEPH E. C ORCORAN, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. E DWIN G. B USS, S UPERINTENDENT, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

Reversed and remanded by Supreme Court opinion filed 6/26/03. Petition for cert granted by Supreme Court order filed 11/18/02. Filed: June 4, 2002 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-23 (CA-99-2420-JFM) Kevin Wiggins, Petitioner - Appellee, versus Thomas R

288 F.3d 629 Kevin WIGGINS, Petitioner-Appellee,v.Thomas R. CORCORAN, Warden, Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center; William W. Sondervan, Commissioner of Corrections of the State of Maryland; J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Respondents-Appellants. No. 01-23. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued January 24, 2002. Decided May 2, 2002

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Ciruit Judge: We are required in this case to revisit a recurring tension in our dual system of justice. The federal courts have a fundamental obligation to adjudicate controversies within their jurisdiction. Yet they also have a duty to abstain from doing so when the case falls within one of the narrow recognized c