⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “World Access Inc v. Simple Communication Technologies”

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003-10-03 · Published · cited 5× · 301 B.R. 217; 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 1424; 2003 WL 22474597
301 B.R. 217 (2003) In re WORLD ACCESS, INC., et al., Debtors. R2 Investments, LDC, Plaintiff, v. World Access, Inc., WA Telcom Products Co., Inc., WorldxChange Communications, Inc., Facilicom International LLC, World Access Telecommunications Group, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 01 B 14633. Adversary No. 01 A 01219. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2014-12-15 · Published · cited 1× · 66 F. Supp. 3d 847; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173595; 2014 WL 7156381
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARK LANE, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court are Defendant Systems Made Simple, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed July 11, 2014 (Clerk’s Dkt. No. 40); Defendant TEKsys-tems, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Appendix, filed July 11, 2014 (Clerk’s Dkt. Nos. 41, 42); Plaintiff Aaron Lockhart’s Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motions for
New York Supreme Court · 2017-05-10 · Published · cited 2× · 56 Misc. 3d 700; 54 N.Y.S.3d 837
OPINION OF THE COURT Shirley Werner Kornreich, J. Defendants Designer Pages Online LLC (DPO) and FXFOWLE Architects, LLP separately move,1 pursuant to CPLR 3211, to dismiss the amended complaint (the AC). Plaintiff Spec Simple, Inc. opposes the motions. Defendants’ motions are granted in part and denied in part for the reasons that follow. I. Factual Backgr
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004-03-16 · Published · cited 6× · 310 F. Supp. 2d 1281; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4403
310 F.Supp.2d 1281 (2004) In re: WORLD ACCESS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION No. CIV.A. 1:99-CV-43-OD. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. March 16, 2004. *1282 *1283 Martin Chitwood, Esq., David A. Bain, Esq., Chitwood & Harley, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff. James Davi
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023-07-19 · Published · cited 0× · 300 A.3d 430; 2023 Pa. Super. 126
J-E01003-23 2023 PA Super 126 SHANNON CHILUTTI AND KEITH : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CHILUTTI, H/W : PENNSYLVANIA : Appellants : : : v. :
District Court, E.D. New York · 2009-03-05 · Published · cited 15× · 780 F. Supp. 2d 196; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25242; 2009 WL 7445199
780 F.Supp.2d 196 (2009) CA, INC., Plaintiff, v. SIMPLE.COM, INC., Wired Solutions, LLC., a revoked Nevada LLC, Defendants. No. 02 Civ. 2748 (DRH)(MLO). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 5, 2009. *201 Covington & Burling, by: Samuel F. Ernst, Esq., Robert D. Fram, Esq., Michael M. Markman, Esq., & Leonard
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022-10-12 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 Pa. Super. 172
J-A03009-22 2022 PA Super 172 SHANNON CHILUTTI AND KEITH : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CHILUTTI, H/W : PENNSYLVANIA : Appellants : : : v. :
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2023-08-10 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued August 10, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ——————————— NO. 01-21-00455-CV ——————————— FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant V. RICHARD MURPHY AND DRIL-QUIP,
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009-04-17 · Published · cited 22× · 404 B.R. 593; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 1025; 2009 WL 1044869
404 B.R. 593 (2009) In re ACCESS CARDIOSYSTEMS, INC., Debtor. Access Cardiosystems, Inc., North American Enterprises, Inc., John Moriarty and Associates, John J. Moriarty, Richard F. Connolly, Jr., and Joseph R. Zimmell, Plaintiffs, Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Access Cardiosystems, Inc., *594 Plaintiffs-Intervenors,[1] v. Randall Fincke, Defendant. Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-11-08 · Published · cited 9× · 17 F.4th 930
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WHATSAPP INC., a Delaware No. 20-16408 corporation; FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 4:19-cv-07123- PJH v. NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES OPINION LIMITED; Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Defendants-Appellants.
District Court, N.D. California · 2017-03-06 · Published · cited 1× · 239 F. Supp. 3d 1174; 2017 WL 878381; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31622
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 24 LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiff X One, Inc. (“X One” or “Plaintiff’) filed a patent infringement suit against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber” or “Defendant”) and alleged that Defendant infringed the claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,798,647 and 8,798,593. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to D
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014-05-09 · Published · cited 63× · 751 F.3d 1327; 110 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1886; 2014 WL 1855416; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8745
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. The world has come a long way; this is a patent case about robots. InToueh Tech *1332 nologies, Inc. d/b/a InTouch Health (“In-Touch”) and VGo Communications, Inc. (“VGo”) both manufacture remote telepresence robot systems. In 2012, InTouch filed a First Amended Complaint
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020-06-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. ) Consol. C.A. No. CLASS V STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION ) 2018-0816-JTL MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: March 13, 2020 Date Decided: June 11, 2020 Ned Weinberger, Derrick Farrell, Mark Richardson, Thomas Curry, LABATON SUCHAROW LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; David M. Cooper, Silpa Maruri, Dominic Pod
District Court, C.D. California · 2009-12-15 · Published · cited 11× · 719 F. Supp. 2d 1115; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129128; 2009 WL 6617192
719 F.Supp.2d 1115 (2009) AURORA WORLD, INC., Plaintiff, v. TY INC., Defendant. Case No. CV 09-08463 MMM (Ex). United States District Court, C.D. California. December 15, 2009. *1121 Raymond B. Kim, Vincent Henry Chieffo, Wendy M. Mantell, Courtney J. Chai, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Robert L. Meylan, Shaunt T. Arevian, Murphy Rosen
District Court, N.D. California · 2015-07-17 · Published · cited 26× · 114 F. Supp. 3d 852; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94181; 2015 WL 4397706
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS JON S. TIGAR, District Judge Before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants' Ubér Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Rasier-CA, LLC. ECF No. 16. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Allegations
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009-09-11 · Published · cited 492× · 580 F.3d 1301; 92 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1555; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20325; 2009 WL 2902044
580 F.3d 1301 (2009) LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant, and Lucent Technologies Guardian I LLC, Counterclaim Defendant, and Multimedia Patent Trust, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. GATEWAY, INC., Gateway Country Stores LLC, Gateway Companies, Inc., Cowabunga Enterprises, Inc., and Gateway Manufacturing LLC, Defendants/Counterclaimants, and Dell Inc., Defendant/Counterclaimant, and Mic
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015-09-17 · Published · cited 1× · 802 F.3d 314; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 16619
Judge STRAUB concurs in part and dissents in part in a separate opinion. DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge: This ease concerns the tremendous property damage caused by the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Just months before the attacks, in April 2001, World Trade Center Properties LLC and affiliated companies (‘WTCP”)1 obtained 99-year leases for 1, 2, 4, and 5 World T
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016-01-21 · Published · cited 9× · 810 F.3d 1075; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 1029; 2016 WL 258632
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Fidlar Technologies (“Fidlar”) brings this action against LPS Real Estate Data Solutions, Inc. (“LPS”) for violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”) and the Illinois Computer Crime Preven*1077tion Law (“CCPL”). Fidlar claims that LPS improperly downloaded county land records provided through Fidlar’s services. The district court
District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2015-03-05 · Published · cited 1× · 82 F. Supp. 3d 844; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27170; 2015 WL 1059007
ORDER SARA DARROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Fidlar Technologies (“Fidlar”) sued LPS Real Estate Data Solutions, Inc. (“LPS”) under the civil-suit provision of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1030(g), and under the civil-suit provision the Illinois Computer Crime Prevention Law (“CCPL”), 720 ILCS 5/17-51 (2011). Fidlar also alleged a common law trespass to chattels claim.
Michigan Supreme Court · 2022-07-28 · Published · cited 0×
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra