Cases

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: George Edward McDermott appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to intervene and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. McDermott v. Virginia, No

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. An arbitration panel found Manhattan Construction Company (“Manhattan”) liable for approximately $1.1 million in unpaid services and attorney’s fees on a subcontract to renovate the Capitol Visitor Center in Washington, DC. Fearing exposure to multiple or inconsistent obligations on this award, Manhattan depo

815 F.Supp.2d 36 (2011) UNITED STATES of America for the Use and Benefit of MILESTONE TARANT, LLC/HIGHLAND ORNAMENTAL IRON WORKS, INC., a Joint Venture, Plaintiff/Use-Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-2186 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 1, 2011. *37 Herman M.

B. Alleging Fraud Complaints brought under the False Claims Act must comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b). United States ex rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp. , 286 F.3d 542, 551-52 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Rule 9(b) requires that a "party state with particularity the circumst

PER CURIAM: ** The judgment of the district court is affirmed for essentially the reasons set out in the Oral Reasons for Judgment filed April 26, 2004. AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th

407 F.Supp.2d 1230 (2005) Marie L. SOWDER, Executrix of the Estate of Tony R. Sowder, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. CV-02-0136-WFN. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. November 10, 2005. Gary C. Randall, James Joseph Workland, Workland & Witherspoon PLLC, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff. Jeffrey Swyers, Jennifer D.

20-2756-cv United States of America ex rel. Hassan Foreman v. AECOM et al. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2020 4 (Argued: May 21, 2021 Decided: November 19, 2021) 5 Docket No. 20-2756-cv 6 7 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. HASSAN FOREMAN, 9

672 F.Supp.2d 92 (2009) UNITED STATES of America for the use and benefit of MILESTONE TARANT, LLC, and Highland Ornamental Iron Works, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Milestone Tarant, LLC, and Highland Ornamental Iron Works, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Manhattan Construction Company, Defendant. Civil Action Nos. 08-02186 (RCL), 09-01941(RCL). United States District Cour

CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant George Hyman Construction Company (“Hyman”) appeals from the district court’s judgment awarding recovery to the Water Works Supply Corporation (“Water Works”) under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a-270d (1986) (the “Miller Act” or the “Act”). Hyman makes a number of arguments as to why the district court erred in allowing reco

191 F.Supp.2d 1128 (2000) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Dianne B. GILES, Plaintiff, v. Lyle SARDIE, an individual, Evan Martinez, an individual; Willie Dixon, an individual; Gregory Dixon, an individual; Wallace Kent, an individual; Sam Okike, an individual; David Lee Weems, an individual; ABC Demolition, a Business Entity of Unknown Legal Status; ACE Industries, a Business Entity of Unknown Legal Status; Cal West Demo, a Business Entity of Un

191 F.Supp.2d 1117 (2000) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Dianne B. GILES, Plaintiff, v. Lyle SARDIE, an individual, Evan Martinez, an individual; Willie Dixon, an individual; Gregory Dixon, an individual; Wallace Kent, an individual; Sam Okike, an individual; David Lee Weems, an individual; ABC Demolition, a Business Entity of Unknown Legal Status; ACE Industries, a Business Entity of Unknown Legal Status; Cal West Demo, a Business Entity of Un

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PAUL W. GRIMM,' District Judge. Relator Robert Simmons (“Relator” or “Simmons”) moves for an award of 22% of 'the $2.3,million settlement.between the United States and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”), pursuant to ' the qui tam: relator’s share provisions of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d)(1). Relator’s Mot., ECF No. 38. Simmo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELIZABETH CARMER, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-1100 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOUYEN BROWN LOPEZ et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-2408 (TJK) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM Later this month, the Secretary of Agriculture plans to convey a parcel of land in Arizona containing an area known

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) RONALD PANNELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:20-cv-518 (CKK/GMH) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARK WILLIAM TOWNSEND, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 15-1644 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINI

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Per Curiam Plaintiffs filed these actions in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma to challenge a regulation issued by the Environmental Protection Agency defining the term “waters of the United States” for purposes of the Clean Water Act. The district court dismissed both cases, concluding

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GUISEPPE SEDITA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:24-cv-00900 (TNM) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER “Where was the Judge whom he had never seen? Where was the High Court, to which he had never penetrated?” Franz

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 28, 2025 Decided July 11, 2025 No. 25-1009 IN RE: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER On Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition Melissa N. Patterson, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the petition and the reply were Matthew G. Olsen, Assistant Att

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 28, 2025 Decided July 11, 2025 No. 25-1009 IN RE: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER On Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition Melissa N. Patterson, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the petition and the reply were Matthew G. Olsen, Assistant Att