Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-2502 S TEVE C ARLISLE, JOHN B USZKIEWICZ, and T EAM E XCAVATING, INC., individually and d/b/a Klear Kut Excavating, and d/b/a Klear Kut Excavating, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. D EERE & C OMPANY, d/b/a Deere Power Systems Group, Defendant-Appellee. Ap

599 S.E.2d 164 (2004) 278 Ga. 192 JOHN DEERE COMPANY v. HARALSON. No. S03G1726. Supreme Court of Georgia. July 12, 2004. *165 Alston & Bird, Candace N. Smith, Paul J. Kaplan, Atlanta, for appellant. Kitchens, Kelley & Gaynes, P.C., Mark A. Kelley, Atlanta, Key, McCain & Gordy, P.C., R. M

Ruffin, Presiding Judge, concurring specially. Although I concur in the result reached by the majority, I do not agree with all that is said in the opinion. In particular, I disagree with the majority’s apparent conclusion in Division 2 that a signature can never sufficiently identify a guarantor in a guaranty agreement. “To satisfy the Statute of Frauds, the guaranty must identify the deb

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17-1503 Filed January 9, 2019 THOMAS JAMES DUNLAP, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. AIG, INC., COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY INSURANCE COMPANY and AIG DOMESTIC CLAIMS, INC. CORPORATIONS, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie K. Vaudt, Judge. Thomas Dunlap

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS PETER J. PINO, FILED Claimant Below, Petitioner February 13, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME C

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Sears Roebuck & Co. and FILED Liberty Mutual Insurance July 30, 2020 Company/Helmsman Management, EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK Petitioners Below, Petitioners SUPREME COURT OF APPE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 24-2049 Filed October 29, 2025 MECENE LAGUERRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. JBS USA HOLDINGS, INC. and AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Paul D. Scott, Judge. An employee appeals the district court’s denial

[1] This is a proceeding to review an order of the trial court denying Maxine Deere's claim for death benefits as surviving widow of Thurman Deere who suffered a fatal heart attack the evening of March 19, 1975. Mr. Deere had been employed by respondent, CRC Crose, as a machinist since 1957 and he was so employed at the time of his death. Claimant alleged that his death resulted from strain and over-exertion at his job. Respondent denied that Mr. Deere's death arose out of or in the c

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Through the exercise of our diversity jurisdiction, federal courts have interpreted Mississippi strict products liability law in a manner that is not justified either by Mississippi state court precedents or generally accepted strict products liability doctrine. These federal decisions lead the majority to uphold the district court’s conclusion that the danger presented by t

POSNER, Chief Judge. From the wreck of the Penn Square Bank more than a decade ago, which nearly dragged the Continental Illinois National Bank down with it, still another ease has found its way to this court, a diversity suit by Tatum Singletary and members of his family against Continental and others, charging fraud and other misconduct. The suit was filed in 1989, and dismi

Larson, J. Claimant Russell Burt, a married man with _three children, was employed by defendant at the time of the alleged injury to his lungs. Although five errors are assigned under three divisions there is essentially but one question presented: Is there any substantial evidence that claimant’s lung condition arose out of and in the course of his employment? His employment for the last 6% years at 8 hours

PER CURIAM: The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and the Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 16) the Petition for Rehe

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I. In discussing the validity of the patent, the majority opinion demonstrates complete understanding of the issues. Because I think the result my brethren reach is correct, I concur. However, while the approach they take pursues a line indi

RAWLINGS, Justice. The deputy industrial commissioner denied plaintiff-applicant’s claim for additional compensation on second review-reopening hearing. Claimant appealed to district court, and from affirmance of commissioner’s adjudication he takes appeal. William Gosek, claimant, was injured January 15, 1962, while employed by defendant, Garmer and Stiles Company.

130 N.W.2d 667 (1964) Louis KELLOGG, Claimant-Appellee, v. SHUTE AND LEWIS COAL COMPANY, Employer, and Equitable National Insurance Company, Insurance Carrier, Defendants-Appellants. No. 51435. Supreme Court of Iowa. October 20, 1964. Austin, Grefe & Sidney, Des Moines, for appellants. Hugh W. Lundy, Albia, and H. S. Life, Oskaloosa, for appellee.

In Banc. This is an appeal by H.J. Carruthers, executor of the estate of Harper Workman, deceased, from two orders of the circuit court of Multnomah county, probate department. The first order denied a petition filed by Carruthers January 27, 1936, and the second denied a petition filed April 22, 1936. The second petition in all of its material parts was a duplicate of the first. The following is a summary of the second petition: After Workman's death and the admission of his will to probate,

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER AFFIRMING THE BANKRUPTCY COURT’S ORDER AND JUDGMENT Jill N. Parrish, United States District Court Judge Before the court are an appeal and cross-appeal from two orders of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah (the “Bankruptcy Court”): (1) the Order and Judgment Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judg<

05/13/2025 DA 24-0238 Case Number: DA 24-0238 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2025 MT 99 JOHN GROSVOLD, d/b/a/ GROSVOLD EXCAVATING, Plaintiff, Counterclaim-Defendant, Ap

Wise, J. {¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant Reginald Conley appeals his conviction on two counts of murder entered in the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas following a jury trial. {¶ 2} Plaintiff-Appellee is the State of Ohio. STATEMENT OF THE CASE {¶ 3} On July 22, 2016, the Delaware County Ohio Grand Jury return

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS CARPENTER LOGGING, LLC FILED March 21, 2018 Employer Below, Petitioner EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS