⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Woods v. Starbucks Corporation”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-03-25 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HAROLD STANLEY JACKSON, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 19-1487 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 46, 48, 55 :
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007-06-14 · Published · cited 2× · 491 F. Supp. 2d 737; 73 Fed. R. Serv. 1041; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43235; 2007 WL 1730134
491 F.Supp.2d 737 (2007) Larry BECTON, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION dba Starbucks Coffee Company, Defendant. No. 2:05-cv-1143. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. June 14, 2007. *738 Robert C. Wood, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff. Gerald Paul Ferguson, Vorys Sater Seymour & Pease, Columbus, O
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018-02-02 · Published · cited 31× · 881 F.3d 969
Rovner, Circuit Judge. While Beebe and Lucas Roh were at Starbucks on Rush Street in Chicago, Illinois with their two sons Alexander and Marcus, a wood and metal stanchion fell onto Marcus Roh’s finger. Marcus’s injured finger had to be amputated that same day. Beebe sued Starbucks Corporation in state court on" behalf of Marcus, claimin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 141 N.Y.S.3d 346; 192 A.D.3d 1152; 2021 NY Slip Op 02002
Richards v Starbucks Corp. (2021 NY Slip Op 02002) Richards v Starbucks Corp. 2021 NY Slip Op 02002 Decided on March 31, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-11-05 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0305p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, │ Peti
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2002-12-03 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-12-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JERMAINE WOODS Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-0782 (CKK) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (December 29, 2022) This matter involving alleged police brutality is before the Co
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-02-24 · Published · cited 0× · 820 F.3d 1193; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3225; 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,498; 128 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1601; 2016 WL 723012
Case: 12-15548 Date Filed: 02/24/2016 Page: 1 of 113 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT __________________________ No. 12-15548 __________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cv-
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-02-24 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 12-15548 Date Filed: 02/24/2016 Page: 1 of 112 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT __________________________ No. 12-15548 __________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cv-
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010-03-23 · Published · cited 1× · 779 N.W.2d 582; 2010 Minn. App. LEXIS 37; 2010 WL 1029630
779 N.W.2d 582 (2010) STATE BANK OF DELANO, Respondent, v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. d/b/a CenterPoint Energy, Appellant, Kensington Equity Partners, Inc., Respondent, Swartz Brothers Associates, Inc., as Receiver of Real Estate of Kensington Equity Partners, Inc. in Starbuck, Minnesota, Respondent, Glacial Hills Elementary School, Respondent. No. A09-962. Court of Appeals of Minne
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017-07-12 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 16‐4106 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. BRANKO BOGDANOV, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court fo
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017-07-12 · Published · cited 1× · 863 F.3d 630; 2017 WL 2961093; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12426
WOOD, Chief Judge. Branko Bogdanov pleaded guilty to two criminal counts stemming from his family’s multi-million dollar shoplifting scheme: one count for conspiring to transport stolen goods in interstate commerce, 18 U.S.C. § 2314, and one" count for a substantive violation of the same law. The district court sentenced him to 48 months’ imprisonment and entered a preliminary order of forfeiture in the amount of $2.8 million.
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-03-31 · Published · cited 7× · 305 F. Supp. 3d 540
GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: Sore throats. Ringing ears. Embarrassed friends. The longest version of Bohemian Rhapsody, ever. These perils of karaoke are widely known. Keats Bar on Second Avenue is facing a lesser known peril of the industry: a trademark infringement and unfair competition lawsuit in federal court. Plaintiff alleges that the use of copied versions of its karaoke accompaniment tracks violates its t
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025-03-19 · Published · cited 0× · 567 P.3d 494; 339 Or. App. 112
112 March 19, 2025 No. 236 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON Annette FISK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRED MEYER STORES, INC., an Ohio corporation, Defendant-Respondent. Multnomah County Circuit Court 21CV19744; A182350 Eric L. Dahlin, Judge. Argued and submitted Februar
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-03-07 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARK CARTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 22-02801-BAH ) Judge Beryl A. Howell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019-05-20 · Published · cited 0× · 924 F.3d 460
St. Eve , Circuit Judge . Robert McCarty tripped over a product display sign at a Menard's home improvement store and then filed suit. The district court dismissed the case at summary judgment in favor of Menard. We affirm based on the open and obvious doctrine which implicates the general duty of care owed to business invitees in Illinois. <
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019-05-20 · Published · cited 22× · 927 F.3d 468
St. Eve, Circuit Judge. Robert McCarty tripped over a product display sign at a Menard's home improvement store and then filed suit. The district court dismissed the case at summary judgment in favor of Menard. We affirm based on the open and obvious doctrine which implicates the general duty of care owed to business invitees in Illinois.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016-09-01 · Published · cited 0× · 835 F.3d 856; 2016 WL 4547350
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. The Minnesota Department of Public Safety (DPS) maintains a database of driver’s license data (DPS database). It is the alleged misuse of that database information which is the subject of these appeals. A number of Minnesota driver’s license holders (plaintiffs) brought suit against numerous cities, counties, and other government entities (local entities); numerous unknown law enfo
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2025-03-25 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FIVE JOSEPH SIMMONS III, ET AL. ) No. ED112785 ) Appellants, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County vs. )
People v. Woodpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2024-07-11 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 7/11/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE ex rel. COLIN BURNS, as City Attorney, etc., G061001 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2020-01164408) v.