Cases

Lisa P. Page, Judge This is an appeal by Jamie Morgan (“Mother”) from the trial court’s judgment modifying a previous judgment dissolving her marriage to Justin Morgan (“Father”). We affirm. BACKGROUND On or about April 11, 2011, the marriage as between Mother and Father was dissolved pursuant to a consent judgment (“Dissolution J

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1476 Doc: 65 Filed: 08/27/2025 Pg: 1 of 47 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1476 LEAH P. HOLLIS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; GLORIA GIBSON, in her official and individual capaciti

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: This is a qualified immunity appeal that asks us to decide whether defendant school principals violated clearly established law when they restricted elementary students from distributing written religious materials while at school. Answering this question requires recourse to a complicated body of law that seeks, often clumsily, to balance a number of competing First Amendment imperatives. This body

677 F.Supp.2d 424 (2010) David MORGAN, Petitioner v. Thomas DICKHAUT, Commissioner of Corrections, Respondent. C.A. No. 08-cv-30183-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 5, 2010. *427 Catherine J. Hinton, Rankin & Sultan, Boston, MA, for Petitioner. James J. Arguin, Susanne G. Reardon, Office of

WOOD, Circuit Judge. Marcus Morgan, who is African-American, claims that he was fired from his security job at a grocery store operated by defendants SVT, LLC and Strack & Van Til Super Market, Inc. (collectively, SVT) because he dared to report the misconduct of one of the store’s white managers. He sued, alleging that he lost his job on account of his race, in violation

629 F.3d 1228 (2011) Harold Lee HARVEY, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, UNION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Warden, Florida State Prison, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Attorney General of Florida, Respondents-Appellees. No. 08-15868. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. January 6, 2011. *1231 Ross B

ORDER AFFIRMING TENTATIVE RULINGS RE: DEFENDANTS’ DAUBERT MOTIONS AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. Nos. 203, 204, 207, 318] HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO, United States District Judge Plaintiffs People of the State of California and the City of San Diego .(“the City”) and Defendants Kinder > Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., et al. (“Kinder Morgan”) appeared before the Court on Monday

680 S.E.2d 77 (2009) Josephine MORGAN, Plaintiff Below, Appellee, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., an Ohio corporation; and Francis Robert Morgan, Defendants Below, Appellees, and Michelle Archuleta, as Personal Representative of The Estate of Robert Francis Morgan, Cross-Claim Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation, Cross-Claim Defendant Below, Appellee.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PATRICIA A.E. MIROTH; No. 23-15759 STANLEY R. MIROTH, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:22-cv-00460- KJM-JDP v. COUNTY OF TRINITY; TRINITY OPINION COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; TRINITY COUNTY CHILD WELFARE SERVICES; LIZ HAMILTON; MARIO

DECISION ON REFORMATION AVERN COHN, District Judge. I. Introduction This is a commercial finance dispute. Plaintiff, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Chase, hereafter Agent)1 is the Administrative Agent for a group of lenders which includes the Agent, that initially extended credit to Venture Holdings Company, LLC (Venture) in 1999 under a Credit Agreemen

Opinion issued December 31, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00389-CV ——————————— BUCKHEAD INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC., MATTHEW J. MORGAN, AND KEVIN M. KIRTON, Appellants V. BROMPTON CO

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs January 7, 2003 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RICKY WOODS Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 01-259 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge No. W2002-00299-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 3, 2003 A Madison County jury convicted the defendant, Ricky Woods, of aggravated

(2008) In re ENRON CORP., et al., Reorganized Debtors. Enron Corp., Plaintiff, v. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., et al., Defendants. Enron Corp., Plaintiff, v. Mass Mutual Life Insurance Co., et al., Defendants. Enron Corp., Plaintiff, v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., Defendant. Bankrupcty No. 01-16034. Adversary Nos. 03-92677, 03-92682. Nos. 07 Civ. 10527(SAS), 07 Civ. 10530(SAS).

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Qualified Immunity and Summary Judgment, filed June 7, 2016 (Doc. 34)(“MSJ”). The Court held a hearing on September 21, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendants Rio Arri-ba County, Rio Arriba County Sheriffs Department, and Deputy Gilbert Atencio are ent

861 F.Supp. 622 (1994) Trina WYNN, Plaintiff, v. Charles V. MORGAN, Defendant. No. CIV. 3-93-cv-548. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville. July 8, 1994. *623 *624 Gloria S. Moore, Moore & Clark, Knoxville, TN, for plaintiff. J. Robert Walker and Ronald C. Leadb

ACCEPTED 05-15-00369-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 9/8/2015 6:10:20 PM

275 P.3d 1200 (2012) 168 Wn. App. 162 Arthur S. WEST, Appellant, v. THURSTON COUNTY, Respondent. No. 41085-1-II. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2. May 8, 2012. *1203 Arthur West, Olympia, WA, Appellant pro se. Duncan K. Fobes, Mark Allen Anderson, Patterson Buchanan Fobes Leitch & Kalz

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on SWEPI’s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings, filed May 31, 2014 (Doc. 21)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on November 3, 2014. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to determine issues of justiciability; (ii) whether Plaintiff

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MLATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Certification of a Collective Action Under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) and Certification of a Class Action Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(3) and Memorandum in Support, filed September 30, 2014 (Doc. 33) (“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on November 21, 2014. The prim

Memorandum Opinion (as amended with respect to Footnote 9) THOMAS B. BENNETT, Bankruptcy Judge. I. Overview: The Parties, Positions Taken, Relief Requested, and Outcome This Court is confronted by motions filed by The Bank of New York Mellon, as the Indenture Trustee for holders of warrants (Indenture Trustee) issued by Jefferson County, Alabama (here