⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Woods v. Asset Management Professionals, LLC”

New York Supreme Court · 2013-09-09 · Published · cited 0× · 41 Misc. 3d 673
OPINION OF THE COURT Carolyn E. Demarest, J. Defendants Southwest Securities Inc. and Leighton Stallones (collectively referred to as Southwest defendants) move for an order, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), dismissing the complaint as against them. The Southwest defendants’ motion is granted to the extent that the breach of fiduciary duty cause of action (fifth cause of action) is dismi
United States Tax Court · 2020-02-13 · Published · cited 0×
T.C. Memo. 2020-24 UNITED STATES TAX COURT OAKHILL WOODS, LLC, EFFINGHAM MANAGERS, LLC, TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 26557-17. Filed February 13, 2020. Anson H. Asbury and Gilbert L. Carey, Jr., for petitioner. John W. Sheffield III, Christopher D. Bradley, Jason P. Oppenheim, and John T. Art
District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018-01-20 · Published · cited 8× · 304 F. Supp. 3d 746
LJAM employees began to contact Schuster with specific questions about the inner workings of the IPOX index. Schuster provided detailed information on how the IPOX index was compiled. See, e.g., Lazard Ex. 87 at IPOX00006888 (e-mail from Schuster describing "the index construction process"). At one point, Shintaro Kambara, an LJAM employee, mentioned in an e-mail that he had been involved in an IPO fund with Kosaka, who was already corresponding wi
Woods v. Woodspublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016-07-27 · Published · cited 0× · 418 S.C. 100; 790 S.E.2d 906; 2016 S.C. App. LEXIS 89
MCDONALD, J.: In this appeal from family court, Appellant Etta Woods (Wife), argues the family court erred in (1) denying her motion to dismiss because the court lacked jurisdiction based on the parties’ prior agreement; (2) reducing alimony from $8,000 to $4,000; (3) providing for an automatic decrease in alimony two years in the future; (4) granting Respondent Wilfred Woods’s (Husband) motion to reconsider; and (5) failing t
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2010-12-22 · Published · cited 3× · 441 B.R. 791; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135573; 2010 WL 5376177
441 B.R. 791 (2010) MC ASSET RECOVERY, LLC v. COMMERZBANK AG, et al. Action No. 4:06-CV-013-Y. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. December 22, 2010. *795 J. Robert Forshey, Jeff P. Prostok, Suzanne K. Rosen, Forshey & Prostok LLP, Fort Worth, TX, for MC Asset Recovery, LLC. J. Mark Chevallie
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017-06-16 · Published · cited 12× · 257 F. Supp. 3d 892
Order Regarding Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment Susan J. Dlott, Judge This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Jeffrey Cutter (Doc. 71) and the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Ryan Borer and PCM Advisory LLC (“PCM”) (together, “Borer/PCM”). (Doc. 72.) Defendants move for summary judgment as to each claim asserted against them by Plaintiff Horter Inves
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010-01-07 · Published · cited 5× · 677 F. Supp. 2d 806; 30 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 261; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1443; 2010 WL 94566
677 F.Supp.2d 806 (2010) Roger WOODS, Plaintiff, v. ERA MED LLC, John Hustwit, Seacor Holdings Inc., John Does (heretofore unidentified individuals) and ABC Entities (heretofore unidentified corporations, partnerships, and/or other business entities), Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-02495-WY. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. January 7, 2010.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-02-14 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRED BOWERMAN; JULIA Nos. 18-16303 BOWERMAN, on behalf of 18-17275 themselves and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:13- cv-00057-WHO Plaintiffs-Appellees, ORDER AND v. AMENDED
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2012-01-03 · Published · cited 0× · 842 F. Supp. 2d 1119; 2012 WL 379772; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18273
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL/ENFORCE THEIR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS ROSS A. WALTERS, United States Magistrate Judge. The above motions [674] [679] are before the Court. That there is a settlement agreement which should be enforced is not disputed, but there is a dispute about one element, namely whether $70,000 held in the tr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-07-05 · Published · cited 24× · 60 F.4th 459
\FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRED BOWERMAN; JULIA Nos. 18-16303 BOWERMAN, on behalf of themselves 18-17275 and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:13-cv-00057- v. WHO FIELD ASSET SERVICES, INC.; FIELD ASSET SERVICES, LLC, n/k/a Xome OP
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006-07-12 · Published · cited 19× · 634 S.E.2d 195; 280 Ga. App. 440; 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 2321; 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 875
634 S.E.2d 195 (2006) ARGENTUM INTERNATIONAL, LLC et al. v. WOODS et al. No. A06A0698. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 12, 2006. *198 Cummings & Dillard, Michael H. Cummings II, Clayton, for appellants. Cathey & Strain, Edward E. Strain III, Cornelia, Stephens & Shuler, Charles W. Stephens, Gainesville, Kimze
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2020-10-29 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00374-CV ___________________________ FIAMMA STATLER, LP; FIAMMA PARTNERS, LLC; AND FIAMMA MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, Appellants and Appellees V. MATTHEW D. CHALLIS AND JEFFERIES, LLC, Appe
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016-03-07 · Published · cited 0× · 530 S.W.3d 688
*692MEMORANDUM OPINION Opinion by Justice Lang Appellant, Starwood Management, LLC, brought legal malpractice claims against appellees Rose Walker L.L.P. and Don Swaim. ■ The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees. Appellant raises fifteen issues on appeal. We summarize those fifteen points as: (1) whether the trial court erred in
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020-07-22 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AVERY L. WOODS, TRUSTEE OF ) THE AVERY L. WOODS TRUST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0153-JTL ) SAHARA ENTERPRISES, INC., ) ) Defendant. )
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013-08-02 · Published · cited 28× · 84 Mass. App. Ct. 75; 993 N.E.2d 350
Wolohojian, J. This is the second suit brought individually and derivatively by investors in two “feeder” hedge funds against those who controlled or were involved in the operation of the feeder and master funds3 and a related entity, against one feeder fund’s accounting firm, and against the administrator of both feeder funds. The plaintiffs previously filed a substantially similar case in the Delaw
District Court, S.D. New York · 2004-02-11 · Published · cited 6× · 303 F. Supp. 2d 456; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1769; 2004 WL 249550
303 F.Supp.2d 456 (2004) NIKKO ASSET MANAGEMENT CO., LTD., on behalf of itself, and as Trustee of Nikko Money Management Fund ("MMF") and PF HMMF, Nikko Asset Management Co., Ltd. Money Management Fund ("MMF"), and PF HMMF, Plaintiffs, v. UBS AG, UBS Warburg (Japan), Ltd., UBS Warburg, UBS Warburg LLC, UBS AG London Branch, and UBS AG Jersey Branch, Defendants. No. 02 Civ.8151 RWS. United States Distri
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 21-10449 Document: 00516439341 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/19/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 19, 2022
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-03-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-14-00569-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 3/17/2015 7:29:49 PM
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-09-07 · Published · cited 34× · 48 F.4th 419
Case: 21-10449 Document: 00516462923 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/07/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED Septe
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015-07-09 · Published · cited 1× · 113 F. Supp. 3d 471; 2015 DNH 135; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89256; 2015 WL 4127837
MEMORANDUM ORDER JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, District Judge. This case, based on fraud in the inducement, implicates the contours of the crime-fraud exception to the attorney client privilege. Plaintiff Rockwood Select Asset Fund XI, (6) — 1, LLC 'has suéd Karen McGinley, an attorney, and her law. firm, *474Devine, Millimet & Branch