Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Woods v. Asset Management Professionals, LLC”
OPINION OF THE COURT Carolyn E. Demarest, J. Defendants Southwest Securities Inc. and Leighton Stallones (collectively referred to as Southwest defendants) move for an order, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), dismissing the complaint as against them. The Southwest defendants’ motion is granted to the extent that the breach of fiduciary duty cause of action (fifth cause of action) is dismi
T.C. Memo. 2020-24 UNITED STATES TAX COURT OAKHILL WOODS, LLC, EFFINGHAM MANAGERS, LLC, TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 26557-17. Filed February 13, 2020. Anson H. Asbury and Gilbert L. Carey, Jr., for petitioner. John W. Sheffield III, Christopher D. Bradley, Jason P. Oppenheim, and John T. Art
IPOX Schuster, LLC v. Nikko Asset Mgmt. Co., Ltd.public domain
LJAM employees began to contact Schuster with specific questions about the inner workings of the IPOX index. Schuster provided detailed information on how the IPOX index was compiled. See, e.g., Lazard Ex. 87 at IPOX00006888 (e-mail from Schuster describing "the index construction process"). At one point, Shintaro Kambara, an LJAM employee, mentioned in an e-mail that he had been involved in an IPO fund with Kosaka, who was already corresponding wi
Woods v. Woodspublic domain
MCDONALD, J.: In this appeal from family court, Appellant Etta Woods (Wife), argues the family court erred in (1) denying her motion to dismiss because the court lacked jurisdiction based on the parties’ prior agreement; (2) reducing alimony from $8,000 to $4,000; (3) providing for an automatic decrease in alimony two years in the future; (4) granting Respondent Wilfred Woods’s (Husband) motion to reconsider; and (5) failing t
Mc Asset Recovery, LLC v. Commerzbank Agpublic domain
441 B.R. 791 (2010) MC ASSET RECOVERY, LLC v. COMMERZBANK AG, et al. Action No. 4:06-CV-013-Y. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. December 22, 2010. *795 J. Robert Forshey, Jeff P. Prostok, Suzanne K. Rosen, Forshey & Prostok LLP, Fort Worth, TX, for MC Asset Recovery, LLC. J. Mark Chevallie
Horter Investment Management, LLC v. Cutterpublic domain
Order Regarding Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment Susan J. Dlott, Judge This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Jeffrey Cutter (Doc. 71) and the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Ryan Borer and PCM Advisory LLC (“PCM”) (together, “Borer/PCM”). (Doc. 72.) Defendants move for summary judgment as to each claim asserted against them by Plaintiff Horter Inves
Woods v. Era Med LLCpublic domain
677 F.Supp.2d 806 (2010) Roger WOODS, Plaintiff, v. ERA MED LLC, John Hustwit, Seacor Holdings Inc., John Does (heretofore unidentified individuals) and ABC Entities (heretofore unidentified corporations, partnerships, and/or other business entities), Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-02495-WY. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. January 7, 2010.
Fred Bowerman v. Field Asset Services, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRED BOWERMAN; JULIA Nos. 18-16303 BOWERMAN, on behalf of 18-17275 themselves and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:13- cv-00057-WHO Plaintiffs-Appellees, ORDER AND v. AMENDED
Westlake Investment, LLC v. MLP Management, LLCpublic domain
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL/ENFORCE THEIR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS ROSS A. WALTERS, United States Magistrate Judge. The above motions [674] [679] are before the Court. That there is a settlement agreement which should be enforced is not disputed, but there is a dispute about one element, namely whether $70,000 held in the tr
Fred Bowerman v. Field Asset Services, Inc.public domain
\FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRED BOWERMAN; JULIA Nos. 18-16303 BOWERMAN, on behalf of themselves 18-17275 and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:13-cv-00057- v. WHO FIELD ASSET SERVICES, INC.; FIELD ASSET SERVICES, LLC, n/k/a Xome OP
Argentum International, LLC v. Woodspublic domain
634 S.E.2d 195 (2006) ARGENTUM INTERNATIONAL, LLC et al. v. WOODS et al. No. A06A0698. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 12, 2006. *198 Cummings & Dillard, Michael H. Cummings II, Clayton, for appellants. Cathey & Strain, Edward E. Strain III, Cornelia, Stephens & Shuler, Charles W. Stephens, Gainesville, Kimze
Fiamma Statler, LP, Fiamma Partners, LLC, and Fiamma Management Group, LLC v. Matthew D. Challis and Jefferies, LLCpublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00374-CV ___________________________ FIAMMA STATLER, LP; FIAMMA PARTNERS, LLC; AND FIAMMA MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, Appellants and Appellees V. MATTHEW D. CHALLIS AND JEFFERIES, LLC, Appe
Starwood Management, LLC ex rel. Gonzalez v. Swaimpublic domain
*692MEMORANDUM OPINION Opinion by Justice Lang Appellant, Starwood Management, LLC, brought legal malpractice claims against appellees Rose Walker L.L.P. and Don Swaim. ■ The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees. Appellant raises fifteen issues on appeal. We summarize those fifteen points as: (1) whether the trial court erred in
Woods v. Sahara Enterprises, Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AVERY L. WOODS, TRUSTEE OF ) THE AVERY L. WOODS TRUST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0153-JTL ) SAHARA ENTERPRISES, INC., ) ) Defendant. )
Wolohojian, J. This is the second suit brought individually and derivatively by investors in two “feeder” hedge funds against those who controlled or were involved in the operation of the feeder and master funds3 and a related entity, against one feeder fund’s accounting firm, and against the administrator of both feeder funds. The plaintiffs previously filed a substantially similar case in the Delaw
303 F.Supp.2d 456 (2004) NIKKO ASSET MANAGEMENT CO., LTD., on behalf of itself, and as Trustee of Nikko Money Management Fund ("MMF") and PF HMMF, Nikko Asset Management Co., Ltd. Money Management Fund ("MMF"), and PF HMMF, Plaintiffs, v. UBS AG, UBS Warburg (Japan), Ltd., UBS Warburg, UBS Warburg LLC, UBS AG London Branch, and UBS AG Jersey Branch, Defendants. No. 02 Civ.8151 RWS. United States Distri
NexPoint v. Highland Capital Managementpublic domain
Case: 21-10449 Document: 00516439341 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/19/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 19, 2022
Burton Kahn v. Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 04-14-00569-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 3/17/2015 7:29:49 PM
NexPoint v. Highland Capital Managementpublic domain
Case: 21-10449 Document: 00516462923 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/07/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED Septe
2015 DNH 135 Rockwood Select Asset Fund XI, (6)—1, LLC v. Devine, Millimet & Branch, PApublic domain
MEMORANDUM ORDER JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, District Judge. This case, based on fraud in the inducement, implicates the contours of the crime-fraud exception to the attorney client privilege. Plaintiff Rockwood Select Asset Fund XI, (6) — 1, LLC 'has suéd Karen McGinley, an attorney, and her law. firm, *474Devine, Millimet & Branch