Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Woodrow M. Medina”
Woodrow Maybin v. the State of Texaspublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00414-CR Woodrow Maybin, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-DC-22-904015, THE HONORABLE JON N. WISSER, JUDGE PRESIDING M E M O RAN D U M O PI N I O N
08-0453 Geffrey Klein Baylor College of Medicine v. Cynthia Hernandez IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ No. 08-0453 ════════════ <
Affirmed as Modified and Memorandum Opinion filed August 9, 2011. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Johnson v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER ON MOTION FOR OPT-IN CLASS CERTIFICATION BIERY, District Judge. A SEAFARING PROLOGUE ABOUT AN AIR FORCE BASE CASE Plaintiffs ask the Court to make new law regarding class action procedure in Little Tucker Act cases in the United States District Courts and not abide by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Or as plaintiffs’ counsel cleverly states: An opportunity
State v. Stewartpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 527 Defendant Gerry Stewart has appealed from her convictions of gross sexual imposition and endangering children. She has argued that (1) the trial court incorrectly denied her motion to compel discovery of statements she made to a caseworker from the Medina County Department of Human Services ("DHS") and incorrectly
Johnson v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER CONCERNING JURISDICTION AND MOTIONS FOR CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION AND MOTIONS TO TRANSFER CASE TO COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS BIERY, District Judge. The Past as Prologue In a perfect world, members of the human species would live together in peace, and in Eden-like harmony with the earth which bore us. It is not a perfect world. The dispute
Woodrow W Cape v. United Statespublic domain
*431 KOELSCH, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal by Woodrow W. Cape from a judgment of conviction under the Hobbs Anti-Racketeering Act, 18 U.S. C.A. § 1951. The indictment was in two counts: the first charged appellant with extorting $1,000 from A. J. Curtis a
Cephus v. Texas Health & Human Services Commissionpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, removed from state court and alleging retaliation in employment based on Plaintiff Bonnie Cephus’ (“Cephus’ ”) complaints of race and gender discrimination in violation of (1) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq., (2) 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and (3) Chapter
State of Tennessee v. Michael Allen Gibbspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs January 9, 2013 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL ALLEN GIBBS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Haywood County No. 6458A Clayburn L. Peeples, Judge No. W2012-00800-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 26, 2013 The Defendant, Michael Allen Gibbs, was convicted by a Haywood County jury of first degree felo
Sandor v. Markspublic domain
[Cite as Sandor v. Marks, 2014-Ohio-685.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) WILLIAM SANDOR C.A. No. 26951 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE RICHARD MARKS, et al.
DiMare v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In re DiMare)public domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION WILLIAM C. HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The matter before the Court is the “Plaintiff, Donna DiMare’s Motion for *289Summary Judgement [sic]” (the “Motion for Summary Judgment”) filed by Donna M. DiMare (the “Debtor”), the “Defendant Option Mortgage Corp.’s Opposition to the Plaintif
Hiam v. HomeAway.com, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Peter Hiam (“Hiam”) and Brooke Hutchens (“Hutchens”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) sued HomeAway.com, Inc. (“HomeAway”) under Massachusetts and Colorado consumer protection laws, as well as common law aiding and abetting fraud, in connection with vacation rentals posted on HomeAway’s website. HomeAway moved for
United States v. Alexanderpublic domain
923 F.Supp. 617 (1996) UNITED STATES of America v. Woodrow ALEXANDER, Oscar Castro-Severino, Domingo Guevara-Feli Lee Haven, Nelson Lopez, Rafael Mercedes-Severino, Francis Severino. Cr. No. 2:95 CR 31-03. United States District Court, D. Vermont. February 8, 1996. *618 *619 Karen Rush Shingle
Holguin Exrel. Rubio v. Ysleta Del Sur Pueblopublic domain
954 S.W.2d 843 (1997) Linda HOLGUIN, as Next Friend of Jaji Rubio, a Minor, Individually and as Next of Kin to Rosa Sifuentes, Deceased, Appellant, v. YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO, Appellee. No. 08-96-00124-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. August 28, 1997. Rehearings Overruled November 19, 1997. *845 Woodrow W. B
137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT
Braunstein v. McCabe (In Re McCabe Group)public domain
424 B.R. 1 (2010) In re THE McCABE GROUP, a Professional Corporation, Debtor. Joseph Braunstein, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Karren Kelly McCabe, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 03-17429-WCH. Adversary No. 07-1191. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts, Eastern Division. January 22, 2010. *3 Paula R.C. Bachtell, Gar
Latham v. Aronov Realty Co.public domain
Plaintiff/appellant was criminally assaulted in the parking lot of a shopping *Page 210 mall by third parties. He sued the owners of the mall, the rental agent and the security service hired to guard the mall. The trial judge granted a motion for a directed verdict as to all defendants except those who assaulted the plaintiff/appellant. The sole issue for this Court's consideration is whether the other defendants had a duty to protect the plaintif
Goodwin v. Fawkespublic domain
WILLOCKS, Administrative Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (December 12, 2016) THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs Complaint1 and Motion for Declaratory Judgment as well as the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons stated below, the Court will deny the Plaintiffs Motion and grant the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. BACKGROUND</
Crumpton v. Bridgeport Education Associationpublic domain
993 F.2d 1023 61 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1295,61 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,255, 61 USLW 2779,83 Ed. Law Rep. 63 Otto CRUMPTON; Freddie Crumpton; Jeanette Joyce; DavidJoyce; Martha Looney; Donna Looney; Lucille Lloyd; ReneeLloyd; Winifred Timberlake; Henry Timberlake; John S.Craig; Anthony Craig; June Rhodes; Jerry Rhodes; MinnieBellew; Omah Harper; Keith Harper; Bettina Harper;
233 B.R. 212 (1999) In the Matter of Ramon A. PABON RODRIGUEZ, Elsa Iris Medina Landin, Debtors. Nicasio Lopez Jimenez, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ramon A. Pabon Rodriguez, substituted by Richard Lee, Trustee, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 95-02831, Adversary Nos. 96-0108, 96-0109. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 24, 1999.