Cases

SALTER, J. (concurring). I concur in affirming the judgment of adoption in this case. I write only to emphasize certain parts of the record beyond those detailed by the trial court and my respected colleagues. Those differences pertain to (1) the record regarding the other persons in the adoptive parent’s household and (2) the substantial changes in law and Department of Children and Families’ policy after

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2024 WY 43 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2024 April 22, 2024 PATRICIA KAPPES, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lula M. Tanner, Appellant (Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant), S-23-0146 v.

ACCEPTED 01-15-00556-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/21/2015 10:14:05 PM CHRIST

ACCEPTED 14-15-00882-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/28/2015 8:14:08 PM CHRISTOPHER

ACCEPTED 01-15-00571-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/24/2015 9:45:33 PM CHRIST

337 F.Supp.2d 1281 (2004) Michael G. McMULLIN, Plaintiff, v. John ASHCROFT, United States Attorney General; United States Marshals Service; John Doe (Dr. Richard Miller); and AKAL Security, Inc., Defendants. No. 03 CV 142 JP/LFG. United States District Court, D. Wyoming. September 1, 2004. *1282 *128

24 P.3d 1147 (2001) 2001 WY 54 In the Matter of the Interest of WJH: WJH, Appellant (Defendant), v. The State of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. C-00-9. Supreme Court of Wyoming. June 14, 2001. *1148 Sylvia Lee Hackl, State Public Defender; Donna D. Domonkos, Appellate Counsel; and Marion Yoder, Sen

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I dissent because I believe that the Eleventh Amendment bars all of the claims in this case. Further, the state law claims should have been dismissed under the doctrine of Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 104 S.Ct. 900, 79 L.Ed.2d 67 (1984). Finally, to the extent that Plaintiffs have stated a valid federal equal protection claim for pr

530 U.S. 327 (2000) MILLER, SUPERINTENDENT, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al. v. FRENCH et al. No. 99-224. United States Supreme Court. Argued April 18, 2000. Decided June 19, 2000.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT *329 *329

985 A.2d 928 (2009) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Percy THOMPSON, Appellant. No. 33 EAP 2008 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 14, 2009. Decided December 29, 2009. *930 Lester Roy Zipris, Ellen T. Greenlee, Karl Baker, Defender Association of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, for Percy Thompson.</

379 F.3d 373 J. Richard ERNST, William T. Ervin, James E. Wilson, and John Patrick O'Brien, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Douglas B. ROBERTS, Treasurer of the State of Michigan; Christopher M. DeRose, Director, Department of Management and Budget Office of Retirement Systems; George M. Elworth, Member, Michigan Judges Retirement Board; Roy Pentilla, Member, Michigan Judges Retirement Boar

536 U.S. 24 (2002) McKUNE, WARDEN, et al. v. LILE No. 00-1187. United States Supreme Court. Argued November 28, 2001. Decided June 10, 2002. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT *25 *26 *27

527 U.S. 666 (1999) COLLEGE SAVINGS BANK v. FLORIDA PREPAID POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION EXPENSE BOARD et al. No. 98-149. United States Supreme Court. Argued April 20, 1999. Decided June 23, 1999. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT *667 Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOLLOWING REMAND FROM CIRCUIT COURT WEIGEL, District Judge. The following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, as well as the Preliminary Injunction to which they relate, are predicated upon the decision in Wright v. Rushen (9th Cir.1981) 642 F.2d 1129, which remanded this case to this Court. The Findings and Conclusio

553 F.Supp. 1365 (1983) Joseph TOUSSAINT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ruth RUSHEN, et al., Defendants. No. C-73-1422-SAW. United States District Court, N.D. California. January 14, 1983. *1366 Sidney Wolinsky, Public Advocates, Morris Baller, Mexican-American Legal Defense *1367 and Educational Fun

Donworth, J. Appellant was charged, by information, with committing two murders alleged to have been committed at different times and places on the same day (December 24, 1959). Count I. The first-degree murder of Mrs. Alice Jumper, committed with premeditation and while engaged in committing, in attempting to commit, or in withdrawing from the scene of the commission of, the crimes of rape and robbery.

290 F.2d 751 UNITED STATES of America,v.Donald Kenneth CURRENS, Appellant. No. 13152. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued Oct. 7, 1960.Decided May 1, 1961. H. David Rothman, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant. Hubert I. Teitelbaum, U.S. Atty., Daniel J. Snyder, Asst. U.