⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Woodbridge Group of Companies, LLC”

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018-10-26 · Published · cited 0× · 592 B.R. 761
KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is the Debtors' Motion for Approval of Certain Compromises and Settlements, Partial Substantive Consolidation, and Related Relief with Respect to the Plan (D.I. 2721) (the "Motion"), and the Debtors' request for confirmation of the First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan *764of Liquid
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 593 B.R. 200
KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE *203The Plaintiffs3 in this adversary proceeding filed their First Amended Complaint (Adv. D.I. 12) (the "Complaint") on July 17, 2018, asserting four counts against the Debtors: (1) Seeking a declaratory judgment that the Plaintiffs hold pre
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018-06-20 · Published · cited 0× · 590 B.R. 99
BY: KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is the Debtors' Objection to Contrarian Funds, LLC's ("Contrarian") Proof of Claim No. 1216 (the "Claim Objection"). At issue is: (I) whether an anti-assignment clause contained in a promissory note is a valid restriction on assignment rights under Delaware law;3 (II) whether a non-breaching party to a promissory note in payment default
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015-08-12 · Published · cited 2× · 193 So. 3d 2; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11964; 2015 WL 4747174
KLINGENSMITH, J.. Woodbridge Holdings, LLC (“Wood-bridge”) appeals from the trial court’s corrected final judgment entered after a statutory valuation appraisal proceeding arising under Florida’s dissenting shareholder appraisal rights statute. Thereafter, Prescott Group Aggressive Small Cap Master Fund, G.P., Ravenswood Investments III, L.P., The Ravenswood Investment Company, L.P., and William J. Maeck (“Appellees”) cross-appe
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015-08-12 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT WOODBRIDGE HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant, v. PRESCOTT GROUP AGGRESSIVE SMALL CAP MASTER FUND, G.P., RAVENSWOOD INVESTMENTS III, L.P., THE RAVENSWOOD INVESTMENT COMPANY, L.P., and WILLIAM J. MAECK, et al., Appellees. No. 4D13-1262
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003-08-13 · Published · cited 0× · 276 F. Supp. 2d 255; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14096; 2003 WL 21920910
276 F.Supp.2d 255 (2003) HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. ROYAL HEALTHCARE OF MIDDLE-SEX, LLC; and Middlesex County Improvement Authority, Defendants. Middlesex County Improvement Authority, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, v. Surbhi Tarkas; Amjad Chowdry; and Greenwich Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendants. Civ. No. 01-3223 (WHW). United States District Court, D. New Jers
District Court, N.D. California · 2012-11-27 · Published · cited 111× · 287 F.R.D. 523; 84 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 296; 2012 WL 5975247; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169853
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This putative consumer class action challenges defendants’ representation that Arizona Iced Tea is “All Natural,” given that it contains high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and citric acid. Defendants move f
California Court of Appeal · 2025-03-28 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 3/28/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE 11640 WOODBRIDGE B333848 CONDOMINIUM HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22STCV00778) Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Defe
Superior Court of Delaware · 2021-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P., on ) behalf of itself and its affiliated landlord ) entities, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No. N21C-01-258 MMJ CCLD v. ) ) BRIGHTON COLLECTIBLES,
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014-09-11 · Published · cited 5× · 766 F.3d 241; 2014 WL 4454999
OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge. Dissatisfied with the stock and reliability of power-generating facilities in New Jer *246 sey, the state adopted the Long Term Capacity Pilot Program Act. The Act— known as LCAPP — instructed New Jersey’s Board of Public Utilitie
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011-07-26 · Published · cited 32× · 27 A.3d 202; 422 N.J. Super. 104
27 A.3d 202 (2011) 422 N.J. Super. 104 Joseph J. TRIARSI, as Trustee for the Joseph H. Halpin Insurance Trust, a New Jersey Trust, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BSC GROUP SERVICES, LLC, a/k/a Benefit Service Company, a New Jersey LLC, and Herbert Wright, Defendants-Respondents. DOCKET NO. A-5047-09T1 Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued Feb
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2023-02-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-00535-COA MIMG C WOODRIDGE SUB LLC, MONARCH APPELLANTS INVESTMENT & MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC D/B/A WOODRIDGE APARTMENTS, LAKASHA THOMAS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND SHUANACY EVANS, INDIVIDUALLY v. KIMBERLY COURSE APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/04/2021 TRIAL JUDGE:
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016-04-22 · Published · cited 100× · 821 F.3d 723; 94 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 518; 2016 FED App. 0101P; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7290; 2016 WL 1612825
OPINION CLELAND, District Judge. This case is grounded in a story all too familiar to jurists (and to busiriess interests, we suspect): a promising joint venture gone wrong. Following the breakdown of the parties’ busiriess relationship, Cranpark, Inc. (“Cranpark”) sued and won a $15.6' million jury verdict based on a
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014-04-28 · Published · cited 2× · 2014 Ohio 1780
[Cite as Aquasea Group, L.L.C. v. Singletary, 2014-Ohio-1780.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO AQUASEA GROUP, LLC, et al., : MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellees, : CASE NO. 2013-T-0120 - vs -
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009-11-17 · Published · cited 31× · 982 A.2d 1194; 410 N.J. Super. 453
982 A.2d 1194 (2009) 410 N.J. Super. 453 EPIX HOLDINGS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARSH & McLENNAN COMPANIES, INC., Marsh USA Inc., Marsh Inc., Twin City Fire Insurance Company, and Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents, and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, American International Group, Inc., AIG Risk Management, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2016-04-28 · Published · cited 16× · 126 Fed. Cl. 281; 2016 U.S. Claims LEXIS 353; 2016 WL 1719258
Bid protest; multiple awards of indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contracts; challenge by one of the awardees to a later award of an additional contract; statutory prerequisites for a bid protest; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1); standing; dispute over applicability of the Competition in Contracting Act to the later award OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge.
District Court, E.D. New York · 2011-12-09 · Published · cited 50× · 828 F. Supp. 2d 557; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142290; 2011 WL 6130149
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The Plaintiff in this case, A.W.L.I. Group, Inc. (“AWLI” or “the Plaintiff’) filed a complaint against the Defendant, Amber Freight Shipping Lines (“AFSL” or “the Defendant”) for alleged trademark infringement, false designation of origin, dilution, unfair competition and deceptive trade practices. For the reasons set forth below,
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006-06-30 · Published · cited 3× · 436 F. Supp. 2d 790; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74671; 2006 WL 1828697
436 F.Supp.2d 790 (2006) UNITED GOVERNMENT SECURITY OFFICERS OF AMERICA, International Union Plaintiff, v. SPECIAL OPERATIONS GROUP, INC. Defendant. No. 1:06 CV 219. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. June 30, 2006. *791 Deborah C. Waters, Ferguson Rawls & Raines PC, Suffolk, VA, for Plaintiff.<
Superior Court of Delaware · 2022-05-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PVP ASTON, LLC (f/k/a 98 RA2 ) ASTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP), ) RX FREDERICKSBURG ) INVESTORS L.L.C., RA2 ) MUSKEGON L.L.C., and ACA FSL ) HOLDINGCO, LLC, each a ) Delaware limited liability company, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) C.A. No. N21C-09-095 AML
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009-03-18 · Published · cited 23× · 644 F. Supp. 2d 496; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21778; 2009 WL 737008
644 F.Supp.2d 496 (2009) Orlando S. RAMIREZ and Alberto Torres-Hernandez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. STI PREPAID LLC, STi Phonecard, Inc., Telco Group, Inc., Voip Enterprises, Inc., and Leucadia National Corp., and ABC Corps 1-25, Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1089 (SDW-MCA). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 1