Cases

653 F.Supp.2d 747 (2009) WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC., and Hush Puppies Canada Footwear, Ltd., Plaintiffs, v. WOLVERINE CANADA, INC., Richard Hunt, Mike Dyon, and Paul Dyon, Defendants. No. 1:07-cv-391. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 21, 2009. *751 Scott R. Carvo, Dean F. Pacific, Douglas A.

535 U.S. 81 (2002) RAGSDALE et al. v. WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC. No. 00-6029. United States Supreme Court. Argued January 7, 2002. Decided March 19, 2002. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT *82 *83 Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the

LIVELY, Circuit Judge. From the beginning of these proceedings the Respondent, Wolverine, has insisted that its distribution center located in Rockford, Michigan is not an appropriate bargaining unit under Section 9 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 159(b). Wolverine has maintained throughout the proce

2021 UT 55 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH LAMAR DREW and LARENE DREW, Respondents, v. PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner. No. 20190695 Heard March 5, 2021 Filed September 2, 2021

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Elizabeth T. Clement Brian K. Zahra

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Elizabeth T. Clement Brian K. Zahra

447 B.R. 1 (2011) In re WOLVERINE, PROCTOR & SCHWARTZ, LLC, Debtor. Lynne F. Riley, Chapter 7 Trustee of Wolverine, Proctor & Schwartz, LLC, Plaintiff v. Tencara, LLC, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 06-10815-JNF. Adversary No. 07-1179. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. January 21, 2011. *4 Annapoorni Sankar

408 F.Supp.2d 1169 (2006) Zenobia MONDAINE, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN DRUG STORES, INC. d/b/a Osco's Drug Store # 5161, and Damon Shilhanek, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 04-2351-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. January 11, 2006. *1170 *1171 *1172

171 F.Supp.2d 49 (2001) JENERIC/PENTRON, INC. Plaintiff v. DILLON COMPANY, INC., Chemichl Inc., and Chemichl AG., Defendants Nos. 3:98CV818 (EBB), 3:99CV1775 (EBB). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. August 29, 2001. *50 *51 *52 Michael A. Cantor

613 F.Supp.2d 945 (2009) STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, INC., Defendant. No. 1:07-cv-1088. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. March 16, 2009. *946 Gregory G. Timmer, Mark E. Fatum, Rhoades McKee, PC, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiff. Julie Che

OPINION SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Henry Mishkoff, d/b/a Webfeats, appeals from two preliminary injunctions, respectively entered on October 11, 2001, and December 7, 2001, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, together granting Plaintiff-Appellee the Taubman Company’s (Taubman) request to prevent

At bottom, the case involves an employer that met its statutory obligations and an employee who did not meet his employment *861obligations. The employer is entitled to summary judgment. A. The Summary Judgment Record The facts are shown by the parties' summary judgment evidence. The summary judgment evidence includes

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 13, 2020 Decided June 16, 2020 No. 19-5222 MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., APPELLEES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., APPELLANTS Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colu

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0011p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ENERGY MICHIGAN, INC.; ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESSES │ AD

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge TRAXLER and Judge JONES joined. OPINION DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: This case presents two questions of first impression for this circuit. First, does the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C.A. § 2601 et seq. (West 1999

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: *381In this putative class action under the federal securities laws, lead plaintiffs Michael Gregory, Yeshan Jagroo, and Mindy Frost (collectively, "plaintiffs") claim that pharmaceutical company ProNAi Therapeutics Inc.1 ("ProNAi"), its CEO and President Nick Glover ("Glover"),

582 F.3d 500 (2009) Brenda L. ERDMAN, Appellant, v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 07-3796. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued November 17, 2008. Filed: September 23, 2009. *502 Patricia C. Zucker, [Argued], Daley Zucker Meilton Miner & Gingrich, Wormleysburg, PA, Attorneys for

803 F.Supp.2d 1231 (2011) Jeremy W. BENZ, Plaintiff, v. WEST LINN PAPER COMPANY, Defendant. No. 3:10-cv-519-ST. United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division. July 20, 2011. *1233 Elizabeth Farrell Oberlin, Attorney at Law, Hillsboro, OR, for Plaintiff. Stacey E. Mark, Ater Wynne, LLP, Portland, OR, for Defend

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Currently before the Court are an Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23), Brief in Support (Doc. 24), and Statement of Undisputed Facts (Doc. 25) submitted by Defendants Kimbel Mechanical Systems (“KMS”), Rob Kimbel, Brad Smith, and Dustin Hughes (collectively “Defendants”). Plaintiff Sheil

ORDER JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, United States District Judge BEFORE THE COURT are Defendant’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment (Dkt. 62) and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Counts III, VII, and VIII (Dkt. 63). Each party responded in opposition to the other’s motion (Dkts. 87, 88). Upon consideration, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED in part. Plaintiffs motion is DENIED. Defendant’s