Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Wolfe v. Unnamed”
Justin Wolfe v. Chadwick Dotsonpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6840 Doc: 38 Filed: 07/07/2025 Pg: 1 of 38 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-6840 JUSTIN MICHAEL WOLFE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,
Wolfe v. Bockpublic domain
412 F.Supp.2d 657 (2006) Daniel Lee WOLFE, Petitioner, v. Barbara BOCK, Respondent. No. 01-10053-BC. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division. January 31, 2006. *658 *659 *660 *661
Wolfe v. Devon Energy Production Co.public domain
TOM GRAY, Chief Justice, concurring. At its core, this is a trespass to try title suit. Devon and Gieser have asserted a claim to certain mineral interest, as have Wolfe and Llano. This appeal is a veritable minefield of procedural problems and issues that, if not properly reconciled, can potentially lead to internally inconsistent results and, thus, cause major problems for the trial court and parties on re
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-23-00162-CV KELLY LEE DICKEY, Appellant v. BRYAN COLLIER, LORIE DAVIS, KELLY L. STRONG, CHRISTOPHER S. LACOX, CANDIS M. WELLS, LESLIE L. THOMPSON, JACOB M. WOLF, DANIELLE N. SLIDER, TWO UNNAMED INDIVIDUALS, Appellees From the 278th District Cour
Wolfe v. Carlsonpublic domain
583 F.Supp. 977 (1984) Benjamin WOLFE, Plaintiff, v. Norman A. CARLSON, et al, Defendants. No. 81 Civ. 3505-CSH. United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 4, 1984. *978 Benjamin Wolfe, pro se. John S. Martin, Jr., U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City, for defendants; Steven E. Obus, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City,
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-09-00223-CV FRANK WOLFE, JR. AND LLANO ROYALTY, LTD, Appellants v. DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY, LP, BARBARA JEAN GIESER POYNTER 2004 REVOCABLE MANAGEMENT TRUST, GRAYSON MATTHEW GIESER AND LAURA LEIGH GIESER, Appellees From the 413th District
Wolfe v. Endrespublic domain
113 Ill. App.2d 96 (1969) 251 N.E.2d 740 Dr. John V. Wolfe and Helen L. Wolfe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John Endres and Virginia Endres, Defendants-Appellees, and Helen Guilbert, Inc., Helen Guilbert and John D. Wolfe, Defendants. Gen. No. 52,320. Illinois Appellate Court First District, Fourth Division. July 9, 1969. Rehearing denied
265 F.3d 195 (4th Cir. 2001) ROBERT A. SCARDELLETTI; FRANK FERLIN, JR.; JOEL PARKER; DON BUJOLD, as Trustees of the Transportation Communications International Union Staff Retirement Plan, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.GEORGE THOMAS DEBARR, Individually and as representatives of a class of all persons similarly situated; ANTHONY SANTORO, SR., Defendants-Appellees,andDONALD A. BOBO; R. I. KILROY; F. T. LYNCH; FRANK MAZUR, Defendants,v.<
Levasseur v. Lowerypublic domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.
Toledo v. Heron Arizona Fund 1, L.L.C.public domain
[Cite as Toledo v. Heron Arizona Fund 1, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-1510.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY City of Toledo Court of Appeals No. L-23-1057 Appellee Trial Court No. CVH-22-12616 v. Heron Arizona Fund 1, LLC, et al. DECISION AND JUDGMEN
Mashburn v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.public domain
55 F.Supp.2d 1367 (1999) In re the Complaint of ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD., as owner of the unnamed 1996 Sea-Doo GTS 60HP Vessels, Serial-Numbers ZZNC6638D696 and ZZNC6626D696, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability. Barbara Mashburn, Claimant/Counter-Plaintiff, v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., and Mark Hommen, Counter-Defendants. No. 97-2543-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Flo
Weiler v. Technipower, Inc.public domain
[Cite as Weiler v. Technipower, Inc., 2023-Ohio-465.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA SHAWN WEILER, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 111729 v. : TECHNIPOWER INC., A GEORGIA CORP.,
Wright v. Stephenspublic domain
Wright v Stephens (2025 NY Slip Op 03416) Wright v Stephens 2025 NY Slip Op 03416 Decided on June 6, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
The People v. Dwight Reidpublic domain
State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 41 The People &c., Respondent, v. Dwight Reid, Appellant. Richard M. Greenberg, for appellant. Rachel Bond, for respondent. New York Civil Liberties Union, amic
Simpson v. Colbertpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00479 (CJN) NICOLE COLBERT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jesse Russell Simpson alleges that the District of Columbia and various employees of the D.C. Jail unlawfully denied him certai
McCain v. Vanadiapublic domain
ALEXANDER, J., dissenting. [¶ 18] I respectfully dissent. [¶ 19] Medical malpractice actions are commenced by a filing of a notice of claim in the Superior Court. 24 M.R.S. § 2853(1) (2017). Those actions have a medical malpractice screening panel phase, *117924 M.R.S. §§ 2854 - 2858 (2017), but they remain actions pending
Sauer v. Chicago Transit Authoritypublic domain
2023 IL App (1st) 220791 No. 1-22-0791 Opinion filed May 22, 2023 First Division IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT
schmidt v. esspublic domain
Vermont Superior Court F11 d 2.4 Eddi’ssé/nl mt STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Addison Unit
State v. Dappublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 11/17/2023 09:07 AM CST - 466 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 315 Nebraska Reports STATE V. DAP Cite as 315 Neb. 466 State of Nebraska, ap
Lewis v. Willough at Naplespublic domain
James K. Bredar, Chief Judge MEMORANDUM Derrick Lewis ("Plaintiff") filed suit against The Willough at Naples1 ("Willough") and Oglethorpe, Inc., ("Oglethorpe"), collectively "Defendants," alleging negligence and negligent entrustment based on injuries he sustained while he was a patient at a treatment facility operated by Defendants. Now pending before the Court